Ranking cities for safety investigation by potential for safety improvement

Wen Cheng, Wei Hua Lin, Xudong Jia, Xinkai Wu, Jiao Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors performed a city-level hot-spot identification by using the 4-year data of 265 cities in California. It is intended to equip road safety professionals with more useful information to compare the safety performance of city as a whole. Potential for safety improvement (PSI) was adopted as a measure of crash risk to compare alternate identification of hot spot (HSID) methods, including the Empirical Bayes (EB) and three full Bayesian (FB) alternatives, negative binomial, Poisson log-normal, and the Poisson temporal random effect, for ranking the safety performance of cities. Five evaluation tests which contain the Site Consistency Test, the Method Consistency Test, the Total Rank Difference Test, the Total Performance Difference Test, and the Total Score Test were applied to evaluate the performance of the four HSID methods. Moreover, two cutoff levels, top 5% and 10% cities, were employed for more reliable results. Overall, the study results are consistent with the results of previous quantitative evaluations focused on micro-level HSID. The three FB approaches significantly outperform the EB counterpart. The method accounting for temporal random effect produces more reliable HSID results than those without considering the serial correlations in collision counts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Transportation Safety and Security
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Mar 22 2017

Fingerprint

ranking
performance
test evaluation
micro level
road
evaluation

Keywords

  • city level
  • hot spot identification
  • the Empirical Bayes
  • the full Bayesian

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transportation
  • Safety Research

Cite this

Ranking cities for safety investigation by potential for safety improvement. / Cheng, Wen; Lin, Wei Hua; Jia, Xudong; Wu, Xinkai; Zhou, Jiao.

In: Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, 22.03.2017, p. 1-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{23eefd4397704c8fa10bf9d5deb6e512,
title = "Ranking cities for safety investigation by potential for safety improvement",
abstract = "The authors performed a city-level hot-spot identification by using the 4-year data of 265 cities in California. It is intended to equip road safety professionals with more useful information to compare the safety performance of city as a whole. Potential for safety improvement (PSI) was adopted as a measure of crash risk to compare alternate identification of hot spot (HSID) methods, including the Empirical Bayes (EB) and three full Bayesian (FB) alternatives, negative binomial, Poisson log-normal, and the Poisson temporal random effect, for ranking the safety performance of cities. Five evaluation tests which contain the Site Consistency Test, the Method Consistency Test, the Total Rank Difference Test, the Total Performance Difference Test, and the Total Score Test were applied to evaluate the performance of the four HSID methods. Moreover, two cutoff levels, top 5{\%} and 10{\%} cities, were employed for more reliable results. Overall, the study results are consistent with the results of previous quantitative evaluations focused on micro-level HSID. The three FB approaches significantly outperform the EB counterpart. The method accounting for temporal random effect produces more reliable HSID results than those without considering the serial correlations in collision counts.",
keywords = "city level, hot spot identification, the Empirical Bayes, the full Bayesian",
author = "Wen Cheng and Lin, {Wei Hua} and Xudong Jia and Xinkai Wu and Jiao Zhou",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1080/19439962.2017.1279250",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--22",
journal = "Journal of Transportation Safety and Security",
issn = "1943-9962",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ranking cities for safety investigation by potential for safety improvement

AU - Cheng, Wen

AU - Lin, Wei Hua

AU - Jia, Xudong

AU - Wu, Xinkai

AU - Zhou, Jiao

PY - 2017/3/22

Y1 - 2017/3/22

N2 - The authors performed a city-level hot-spot identification by using the 4-year data of 265 cities in California. It is intended to equip road safety professionals with more useful information to compare the safety performance of city as a whole. Potential for safety improvement (PSI) was adopted as a measure of crash risk to compare alternate identification of hot spot (HSID) methods, including the Empirical Bayes (EB) and three full Bayesian (FB) alternatives, negative binomial, Poisson log-normal, and the Poisson temporal random effect, for ranking the safety performance of cities. Five evaluation tests which contain the Site Consistency Test, the Method Consistency Test, the Total Rank Difference Test, the Total Performance Difference Test, and the Total Score Test were applied to evaluate the performance of the four HSID methods. Moreover, two cutoff levels, top 5% and 10% cities, were employed for more reliable results. Overall, the study results are consistent with the results of previous quantitative evaluations focused on micro-level HSID. The three FB approaches significantly outperform the EB counterpart. The method accounting for temporal random effect produces more reliable HSID results than those without considering the serial correlations in collision counts.

AB - The authors performed a city-level hot-spot identification by using the 4-year data of 265 cities in California. It is intended to equip road safety professionals with more useful information to compare the safety performance of city as a whole. Potential for safety improvement (PSI) was adopted as a measure of crash risk to compare alternate identification of hot spot (HSID) methods, including the Empirical Bayes (EB) and three full Bayesian (FB) alternatives, negative binomial, Poisson log-normal, and the Poisson temporal random effect, for ranking the safety performance of cities. Five evaluation tests which contain the Site Consistency Test, the Method Consistency Test, the Total Rank Difference Test, the Total Performance Difference Test, and the Total Score Test were applied to evaluate the performance of the four HSID methods. Moreover, two cutoff levels, top 5% and 10% cities, were employed for more reliable results. Overall, the study results are consistent with the results of previous quantitative evaluations focused on micro-level HSID. The three FB approaches significantly outperform the EB counterpart. The method accounting for temporal random effect produces more reliable HSID results than those without considering the serial correlations in collision counts.

KW - city level

KW - hot spot identification

KW - the Empirical Bayes

KW - the full Bayesian

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015976940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015976940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19439962.2017.1279250

DO - 10.1080/19439962.2017.1279250

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85015976940

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - Journal of Transportation Safety and Security

JF - Journal of Transportation Safety and Security

SN - 1943-9962

ER -