Rasch analysis of the student refractive error and eyeglass questionnaire

Mabel Crescioni, Dawn H. Messer, Terri L Warholak, Joseph M Miller, John D Twelker, Erin M Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and refine a newly developed instrument, the Student Refractive Error and Eyeglasses Questionnaire (SREEQ), designed to measure the impact of uncorrected and corrected refractive error on vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in school-aged children. METHODS: A 38-statement instrument consisting of two parts was developed: part A relates to perceptions regarding uncorrected vision and part B relates to perceptions regarding corrected vision and includes other statements regarding VRQoL with spectacle correction. The SREEQ was administered to 200 Native American 6th- through 12th-grade students known to have previously worn and who currently require eyeglasses. Rasch analysis was conducted to evaluate the functioning of the SREEQ. Statements on parts A and B were analyzed to examine the dimensionality and constructs of the questionnaire, how well the items functioned, and the appropriateness of the response scale used. RESULTS: Rasch analysis suggested two items be eliminated and the measurement scale for matching items be reduced from a four-point response scale to a three-point response scale. With these modifications, categorical data were converted to interval-level data to conduct an item and person analysis. A shortened version of the SREEQ was constructed with these modifications, the SREEQ-R, which included the statements that were able to capture changes in VRQoL associated with spectacle wear for those with significant refractive error in our study population. CONCLUSIONS: Although part B of the SREEQ appears to have a less-than-optimal reliability to assess the impact of spectacle correction on VRQoL in our student population, it is able to detect statistically significant differences from pretest to posttest on both the group and individual levels to show that the instrument can assess the impact that glasses have on VRQoL. Further modifications to the questionnaire, such as those included in the SREEQ-R, could enhance its functionality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)624-633
Number of pages10
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Volume91
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Refractive Errors
Students
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
North American Indians
Population
Glass

Keywords

  • Native American
  • Psychometrics
  • Questionnaire development
  • Refractive error
  • Vision-related quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Rasch analysis of the student refractive error and eyeglass questionnaire. / Crescioni, Mabel; Messer, Dawn H.; Warholak, Terri L; Miller, Joseph M; Twelker, John D; Harvey, Erin M.

In: Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 91, No. 6, 2014, p. 624-633.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f782c68ba6748308f38b9c2cad20a49,
title = "Rasch analysis of the student refractive error and eyeglass questionnaire",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate and refine a newly developed instrument, the Student Refractive Error and Eyeglasses Questionnaire (SREEQ), designed to measure the impact of uncorrected and corrected refractive error on vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in school-aged children. METHODS: A 38-statement instrument consisting of two parts was developed: part A relates to perceptions regarding uncorrected vision and part B relates to perceptions regarding corrected vision and includes other statements regarding VRQoL with spectacle correction. The SREEQ was administered to 200 Native American 6th- through 12th-grade students known to have previously worn and who currently require eyeglasses. Rasch analysis was conducted to evaluate the functioning of the SREEQ. Statements on parts A and B were analyzed to examine the dimensionality and constructs of the questionnaire, how well the items functioned, and the appropriateness of the response scale used. RESULTS: Rasch analysis suggested two items be eliminated and the measurement scale for matching items be reduced from a four-point response scale to a three-point response scale. With these modifications, categorical data were converted to interval-level data to conduct an item and person analysis. A shortened version of the SREEQ was constructed with these modifications, the SREEQ-R, which included the statements that were able to capture changes in VRQoL associated with spectacle wear for those with significant refractive error in our study population. CONCLUSIONS: Although part B of the SREEQ appears to have a less-than-optimal reliability to assess the impact of spectacle correction on VRQoL in our student population, it is able to detect statistically significant differences from pretest to posttest on both the group and individual levels to show that the instrument can assess the impact that glasses have on VRQoL. Further modifications to the questionnaire, such as those included in the SREEQ-R, could enhance its functionality.",
keywords = "Native American, Psychometrics, Questionnaire development, Refractive error, Vision-related quality of life",
author = "Mabel Crescioni and Messer, {Dawn H.} and Warholak, {Terri L} and Miller, {Joseph M} and Twelker, {John D} and Harvey, {Erin M}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/OPX.0000000000000270",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "624--633",
journal = "Optometry and Vision Science",
issn = "1040-5488",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rasch analysis of the student refractive error and eyeglass questionnaire

AU - Crescioni, Mabel

AU - Messer, Dawn H.

AU - Warholak, Terri L

AU - Miller, Joseph M

AU - Twelker, John D

AU - Harvey, Erin M

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate and refine a newly developed instrument, the Student Refractive Error and Eyeglasses Questionnaire (SREEQ), designed to measure the impact of uncorrected and corrected refractive error on vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in school-aged children. METHODS: A 38-statement instrument consisting of two parts was developed: part A relates to perceptions regarding uncorrected vision and part B relates to perceptions regarding corrected vision and includes other statements regarding VRQoL with spectacle correction. The SREEQ was administered to 200 Native American 6th- through 12th-grade students known to have previously worn and who currently require eyeglasses. Rasch analysis was conducted to evaluate the functioning of the SREEQ. Statements on parts A and B were analyzed to examine the dimensionality and constructs of the questionnaire, how well the items functioned, and the appropriateness of the response scale used. RESULTS: Rasch analysis suggested two items be eliminated and the measurement scale for matching items be reduced from a four-point response scale to a three-point response scale. With these modifications, categorical data were converted to interval-level data to conduct an item and person analysis. A shortened version of the SREEQ was constructed with these modifications, the SREEQ-R, which included the statements that were able to capture changes in VRQoL associated with spectacle wear for those with significant refractive error in our study population. CONCLUSIONS: Although part B of the SREEQ appears to have a less-than-optimal reliability to assess the impact of spectacle correction on VRQoL in our student population, it is able to detect statistically significant differences from pretest to posttest on both the group and individual levels to show that the instrument can assess the impact that glasses have on VRQoL. Further modifications to the questionnaire, such as those included in the SREEQ-R, could enhance its functionality.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate and refine a newly developed instrument, the Student Refractive Error and Eyeglasses Questionnaire (SREEQ), designed to measure the impact of uncorrected and corrected refractive error on vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in school-aged children. METHODS: A 38-statement instrument consisting of two parts was developed: part A relates to perceptions regarding uncorrected vision and part B relates to perceptions regarding corrected vision and includes other statements regarding VRQoL with spectacle correction. The SREEQ was administered to 200 Native American 6th- through 12th-grade students known to have previously worn and who currently require eyeglasses. Rasch analysis was conducted to evaluate the functioning of the SREEQ. Statements on parts A and B were analyzed to examine the dimensionality and constructs of the questionnaire, how well the items functioned, and the appropriateness of the response scale used. RESULTS: Rasch analysis suggested two items be eliminated and the measurement scale for matching items be reduced from a four-point response scale to a three-point response scale. With these modifications, categorical data were converted to interval-level data to conduct an item and person analysis. A shortened version of the SREEQ was constructed with these modifications, the SREEQ-R, which included the statements that were able to capture changes in VRQoL associated with spectacle wear for those with significant refractive error in our study population. CONCLUSIONS: Although part B of the SREEQ appears to have a less-than-optimal reliability to assess the impact of spectacle correction on VRQoL in our student population, it is able to detect statistically significant differences from pretest to posttest on both the group and individual levels to show that the instrument can assess the impact that glasses have on VRQoL. Further modifications to the questionnaire, such as those included in the SREEQ-R, could enhance its functionality.

KW - Native American

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Questionnaire development

KW - Refractive error

KW - Vision-related quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901671342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901671342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000270

DO - 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000270

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 624

EP - 633

JO - Optometry and Vision Science

JF - Optometry and Vision Science

SN - 1040-5488

IS - 6

ER -