Rational choice and democratic deliberation

A theory of discourse failure

Guido M Pincione, Fernando R. Tesón

Research output: Book/ReportBook

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In public political deliberation, people will err and lie in accordance with definite patterns. Such discourse failure results from behavior that is both instrumentally and epistemically rational. The deliberative practices of a liberal democracy (let alone repressive or non-democratic societies) cannot be improved so as to overcome the tendency for rational citizens to believe and say things at odds with reliable propositions of social science. The theory has several corollaries. One is that much contemporary political philosophy can be seen as an unsuccessful attempt to vindicate, on symbolic and moral grounds, the forms that discourse failure take on in public political deliberation. Another is that deliberative practices cannot be rescued even on non-epistemic grounds, such as social peace, impartiality, participation, and equality. To alleviate discourse failure, this 2006 book proposes to reduce the scope of majoritarian politics and enlarge markets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages258
ISBN (Print)9780511720178, 9780521862691
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Discourse
Deliberation
Rational Choice
Social Sciences
Political philosophy
Equality
Participation
Definites
Impartiality
Corollary
Liberal Democracy
Peace

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Rational choice and democratic deliberation : A theory of discourse failure. / Pincione, Guido M; Tesón, Fernando R.

Cambridge University Press, 2006. 258 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Pincione, Guido M ; Tesón, Fernando R. / Rational choice and democratic deliberation : A theory of discourse failure. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 258 p.
@book{82b53fc1ae044b5f9b0be4a1d41c0bca,
title = "Rational choice and democratic deliberation: A theory of discourse failure",
abstract = "In public political deliberation, people will err and lie in accordance with definite patterns. Such discourse failure results from behavior that is both instrumentally and epistemically rational. The deliberative practices of a liberal democracy (let alone repressive or non-democratic societies) cannot be improved so as to overcome the tendency for rational citizens to believe and say things at odds with reliable propositions of social science. The theory has several corollaries. One is that much contemporary political philosophy can be seen as an unsuccessful attempt to vindicate, on symbolic and moral grounds, the forms that discourse failure take on in public political deliberation. Another is that deliberative practices cannot be rescued even on non-epistemic grounds, such as social peace, impartiality, participation, and equality. To alleviate discourse failure, this 2006 book proposes to reduce the scope of majoritarian politics and enlarge markets.",
author = "Pincione, {Guido M} and Tes{\'o}n, {Fernando R.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511720178",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511720178",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Rational choice and democratic deliberation

T2 - A theory of discourse failure

AU - Pincione, Guido M

AU - Tesón, Fernando R.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - In public political deliberation, people will err and lie in accordance with definite patterns. Such discourse failure results from behavior that is both instrumentally and epistemically rational. The deliberative practices of a liberal democracy (let alone repressive or non-democratic societies) cannot be improved so as to overcome the tendency for rational citizens to believe and say things at odds with reliable propositions of social science. The theory has several corollaries. One is that much contemporary political philosophy can be seen as an unsuccessful attempt to vindicate, on symbolic and moral grounds, the forms that discourse failure take on in public political deliberation. Another is that deliberative practices cannot be rescued even on non-epistemic grounds, such as social peace, impartiality, participation, and equality. To alleviate discourse failure, this 2006 book proposes to reduce the scope of majoritarian politics and enlarge markets.

AB - In public political deliberation, people will err and lie in accordance with definite patterns. Such discourse failure results from behavior that is both instrumentally and epistemically rational. The deliberative practices of a liberal democracy (let alone repressive or non-democratic societies) cannot be improved so as to overcome the tendency for rational citizens to believe and say things at odds with reliable propositions of social science. The theory has several corollaries. One is that much contemporary political philosophy can be seen as an unsuccessful attempt to vindicate, on symbolic and moral grounds, the forms that discourse failure take on in public political deliberation. Another is that deliberative practices cannot be rescued even on non-epistemic grounds, such as social peace, impartiality, participation, and equality. To alleviate discourse failure, this 2006 book proposes to reduce the scope of majoritarian politics and enlarge markets.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925207300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925207300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511720178

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511720178

M3 - Book

SN - 9780511720178

SN - 9780521862691

BT - Rational choice and democratic deliberation

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -