Rawlsian perfectionism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents and defends a Rawlsian argument for perfectionist state policies. The argument draws on Rawls's discussion of the "Aristotelian Principle," highlighting the complex relationship between this principle and the social bases of self-respect. The paper explains how Rawls's discussion and endorsement of this principle has significant and unappreciated implications for his account of the human good and the state's role in promoting it in a well-ordered society. Although Rawls explicitly rejected state perfectionism, the paper shows how his conception of justice has the resources to respond to the important criticism that it is insufficiently responsive to the claims of human excellence. Rawlsian perfectionism, in this way, strengthens Rawlsian justice by removing an important reason for rejecting it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)573-597
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Moral Philosophy
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

John Rawls
Perfectionism
Justice
Excellence
Aristotelian
Resources
Self-respect
Criticism
Conception
State Policy

Keywords

  • Justice
  • Neutrality
  • Perfectionism
  • Rawls
  • Self-respect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

Rawlsian perfectionism. / Wall, Steven P.

In: Journal of Moral Philosophy, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2013, p. 573-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wall, Steven P. / Rawlsian perfectionism. In: Journal of Moral Philosophy. 2013 ; Vol. 10, No. 5. pp. 573-597.
@article{d7b37d2d37fc4eb1be23b97aec46a330,
title = "Rawlsian perfectionism",
abstract = "This paper presents and defends a Rawlsian argument for perfectionist state policies. The argument draws on Rawls's discussion of the {"}Aristotelian Principle,{"} highlighting the complex relationship between this principle and the social bases of self-respect. The paper explains how Rawls's discussion and endorsement of this principle has significant and unappreciated implications for his account of the human good and the state's role in promoting it in a well-ordered society. Although Rawls explicitly rejected state perfectionism, the paper shows how his conception of justice has the resources to respond to the important criticism that it is insufficiently responsive to the claims of human excellence. Rawlsian perfectionism, in this way, strengthens Rawlsian justice by removing an important reason for rejecting it.",
keywords = "Justice, Neutrality, Perfectionism, Rawls, Self-respect",
author = "Wall, {Steven P}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1163/17455243-4681023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "573--597",
journal = "Journal of Moral Philosophy",
issn = "1740-4681",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rawlsian perfectionism

AU - Wall, Steven P

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper presents and defends a Rawlsian argument for perfectionist state policies. The argument draws on Rawls's discussion of the "Aristotelian Principle," highlighting the complex relationship between this principle and the social bases of self-respect. The paper explains how Rawls's discussion and endorsement of this principle has significant and unappreciated implications for his account of the human good and the state's role in promoting it in a well-ordered society. Although Rawls explicitly rejected state perfectionism, the paper shows how his conception of justice has the resources to respond to the important criticism that it is insufficiently responsive to the claims of human excellence. Rawlsian perfectionism, in this way, strengthens Rawlsian justice by removing an important reason for rejecting it.

AB - This paper presents and defends a Rawlsian argument for perfectionist state policies. The argument draws on Rawls's discussion of the "Aristotelian Principle," highlighting the complex relationship between this principle and the social bases of self-respect. The paper explains how Rawls's discussion and endorsement of this principle has significant and unappreciated implications for his account of the human good and the state's role in promoting it in a well-ordered society. Although Rawls explicitly rejected state perfectionism, the paper shows how his conception of justice has the resources to respond to the important criticism that it is insufficiently responsive to the claims of human excellence. Rawlsian perfectionism, in this way, strengthens Rawlsian justice by removing an important reason for rejecting it.

KW - Justice

KW - Neutrality

KW - Perfectionism

KW - Rawls

KW - Self-respect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893387644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893387644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/17455243-4681023

DO - 10.1163/17455243-4681023

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893387644

VL - 10

SP - 573

EP - 597

JO - Journal of Moral Philosophy

JF - Journal of Moral Philosophy

SN - 1740-4681

IS - 5

ER -