Re-examination of the dates of large blade technology in China: A comparison of Shuidonggou Locality 1 and Locality 2

Feng Li, Steven L Kuhn, Xing Gao, Fu you Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The presence and age of large blade technology at the Shuidonggou site is a pivotal issue in discussions of the spread of blade technology in East Eurasia. Madsen and colleagues' influential work uses the dates (24,000-29,000 rcy BP [radiocarbon years before present]) they obtained from Shuidonggou Locality 2 to estimate the age of blade technology in this region, and suggested a very late arrival of Levallois-like blade technology from the north. This paper re-examines the evidence for the age of blade technology at Shuidonggou by comparing the lithic assemblages from the new excavations at Locality 2 with those from Locality 1. Several important points are demonstrated: (1) the lithic industry of cultural layers 1 through 4 at Locality 2 is not based on large blades, so reported dates from these layers cannot be an indicator of the age of large blade technology; (2) comparing Locality 1 and 2, the age of large blade technology appears to be around 34,000-38,000 calendar years BP (before present) in this region, suggesting a relatively rapid technology dispersal from the west and/or north; (3) the so-called 'Shuidonggou lower cultural layer' at Locality 1 includes both large blade and simple flake industries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-168
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Human Evolution
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

examination
China
industry
Blade
Locality
comparison
flakes
present
Eurasia
excavation
evidence
Layer

Keywords

  • Asia
  • Lithic industry/technology
  • Radiocarbon dates
  • Upper Paleolithic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Cite this

Re-examination of the dates of large blade technology in China : A comparison of Shuidonggou Locality 1 and Locality 2. / Li, Feng; Kuhn, Steven L; Gao, Xing; Chen, Fu you.

In: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 64, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 161-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1844b2ccb48043c1802e97202aca2ee5,
title = "Re-examination of the dates of large blade technology in China: A comparison of Shuidonggou Locality 1 and Locality 2",
abstract = "The presence and age of large blade technology at the Shuidonggou site is a pivotal issue in discussions of the spread of blade technology in East Eurasia. Madsen and colleagues' influential work uses the dates (24,000-29,000 rcy BP [radiocarbon years before present]) they obtained from Shuidonggou Locality 2 to estimate the age of blade technology in this region, and suggested a very late arrival of Levallois-like blade technology from the north. This paper re-examines the evidence for the age of blade technology at Shuidonggou by comparing the lithic assemblages from the new excavations at Locality 2 with those from Locality 1. Several important points are demonstrated: (1) the lithic industry of cultural layers 1 through 4 at Locality 2 is not based on large blades, so reported dates from these layers cannot be an indicator of the age of large blade technology; (2) comparing Locality 1 and 2, the age of large blade technology appears to be around 34,000-38,000 calendar years BP (before present) in this region, suggesting a relatively rapid technology dispersal from the west and/or north; (3) the so-called 'Shuidonggou lower cultural layer' at Locality 1 includes both large blade and simple flake industries.",
keywords = "Asia, Lithic industry/technology, Radiocarbon dates, Upper Paleolithic",
author = "Feng Li and Kuhn, {Steven L} and Xing Gao and Chen, {Fu you}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.11.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "161--168",
journal = "Journal of Human Evolution",
issn = "0047-2484",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-examination of the dates of large blade technology in China

T2 - A comparison of Shuidonggou Locality 1 and Locality 2

AU - Li, Feng

AU - Kuhn, Steven L

AU - Gao, Xing

AU - Chen, Fu you

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - The presence and age of large blade technology at the Shuidonggou site is a pivotal issue in discussions of the spread of blade technology in East Eurasia. Madsen and colleagues' influential work uses the dates (24,000-29,000 rcy BP [radiocarbon years before present]) they obtained from Shuidonggou Locality 2 to estimate the age of blade technology in this region, and suggested a very late arrival of Levallois-like blade technology from the north. This paper re-examines the evidence for the age of blade technology at Shuidonggou by comparing the lithic assemblages from the new excavations at Locality 2 with those from Locality 1. Several important points are demonstrated: (1) the lithic industry of cultural layers 1 through 4 at Locality 2 is not based on large blades, so reported dates from these layers cannot be an indicator of the age of large blade technology; (2) comparing Locality 1 and 2, the age of large blade technology appears to be around 34,000-38,000 calendar years BP (before present) in this region, suggesting a relatively rapid technology dispersal from the west and/or north; (3) the so-called 'Shuidonggou lower cultural layer' at Locality 1 includes both large blade and simple flake industries.

AB - The presence and age of large blade technology at the Shuidonggou site is a pivotal issue in discussions of the spread of blade technology in East Eurasia. Madsen and colleagues' influential work uses the dates (24,000-29,000 rcy BP [radiocarbon years before present]) they obtained from Shuidonggou Locality 2 to estimate the age of blade technology in this region, and suggested a very late arrival of Levallois-like blade technology from the north. This paper re-examines the evidence for the age of blade technology at Shuidonggou by comparing the lithic assemblages from the new excavations at Locality 2 with those from Locality 1. Several important points are demonstrated: (1) the lithic industry of cultural layers 1 through 4 at Locality 2 is not based on large blades, so reported dates from these layers cannot be an indicator of the age of large blade technology; (2) comparing Locality 1 and 2, the age of large blade technology appears to be around 34,000-38,000 calendar years BP (before present) in this region, suggesting a relatively rapid technology dispersal from the west and/or north; (3) the so-called 'Shuidonggou lower cultural layer' at Locality 1 includes both large blade and simple flake industries.

KW - Asia

KW - Lithic industry/technology

KW - Radiocarbon dates

KW - Upper Paleolithic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873191584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873191584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.11.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 23352562

AN - SCOPUS:84873191584

VL - 64

SP - 161

EP - 168

JO - Journal of Human Evolution

JF - Journal of Human Evolution

SN - 0047-2484

IS - 2

ER -