Recapturing The Falklands

Models of Conservative Popularity, 1979–83

Harold D. Clarke, William T Mishler, Paul Whiteley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently, Sanders et al. have made the intriguing and counter-intuitive argument that the impact of the Falklands war on Conservative popularity was inconsequential. Their analyses raise important theoretical and methodological issues concerning the time-series analysis of party support. This present article contends that the stepwise regression procedures employed by Sanders et al. are misleading, particularly when predictor variables are highly intercorrelated. Box- Jenkins analyses demonstrate that the Falklands strongly influenced Conservative support, net of the effects of macroeconomic conditions and personal economic expectations. The significance of the latter variable in the models confirms Sanders et as argument about the role of subjective economic variables in party popularity functions. Non-economic variables are also relevant, however, and popularity functions that model them correctly will enhance our understanding of both the economics and the politics of party support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-81
Number of pages19
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

popularity
economics
time series analysis
macroeconomics
regression
politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Recapturing The Falklands : Models of Conservative Popularity, 1979–83. / Clarke, Harold D.; Mishler, William T; Whiteley, Paul.

In: British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1990, p. 63-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29f8ed96f3ba4d328f03d89602dff05c,
title = "Recapturing The Falklands: Models of Conservative Popularity, 1979–83",
abstract = "Recently, Sanders et al. have made the intriguing and counter-intuitive argument that the impact of the Falklands war on Conservative popularity was inconsequential. Their analyses raise important theoretical and methodological issues concerning the time-series analysis of party support. This present article contends that the stepwise regression procedures employed by Sanders et al. are misleading, particularly when predictor variables are highly intercorrelated. Box- Jenkins analyses demonstrate that the Falklands strongly influenced Conservative support, net of the effects of macroeconomic conditions and personal economic expectations. The significance of the latter variable in the models confirms Sanders et as argument about the role of subjective economic variables in party popularity functions. Non-economic variables are also relevant, however, and popularity functions that model them correctly will enhance our understanding of both the economics and the politics of party support.",
author = "Clarke, {Harold D.} and Mishler, {William T} and Paul Whiteley",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1017/S0007123400005706",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "63--81",
journal = "British Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0007-1234",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recapturing The Falklands

T2 - Models of Conservative Popularity, 1979–83

AU - Clarke, Harold D.

AU - Mishler, William T

AU - Whiteley, Paul

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - Recently, Sanders et al. have made the intriguing and counter-intuitive argument that the impact of the Falklands war on Conservative popularity was inconsequential. Their analyses raise important theoretical and methodological issues concerning the time-series analysis of party support. This present article contends that the stepwise regression procedures employed by Sanders et al. are misleading, particularly when predictor variables are highly intercorrelated. Box- Jenkins analyses demonstrate that the Falklands strongly influenced Conservative support, net of the effects of macroeconomic conditions and personal economic expectations. The significance of the latter variable in the models confirms Sanders et as argument about the role of subjective economic variables in party popularity functions. Non-economic variables are also relevant, however, and popularity functions that model them correctly will enhance our understanding of both the economics and the politics of party support.

AB - Recently, Sanders et al. have made the intriguing and counter-intuitive argument that the impact of the Falklands war on Conservative popularity was inconsequential. Their analyses raise important theoretical and methodological issues concerning the time-series analysis of party support. This present article contends that the stepwise regression procedures employed by Sanders et al. are misleading, particularly when predictor variables are highly intercorrelated. Box- Jenkins analyses demonstrate that the Falklands strongly influenced Conservative support, net of the effects of macroeconomic conditions and personal economic expectations. The significance of the latter variable in the models confirms Sanders et as argument about the role of subjective economic variables in party popularity functions. Non-economic variables are also relevant, however, and popularity functions that model them correctly will enhance our understanding of both the economics and the politics of party support.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84972003694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84972003694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0007123400005706

DO - 10.1017/S0007123400005706

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 63

EP - 81

JO - British Journal of Political Science

JF - British Journal of Political Science

SN - 0007-1234

IS - 1

ER -