Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of computer display of adult portable chest radiographs

Elizabeth A Krupinski, K. Maloney, S. C. Bessen, M. P. Capp, K. Graham, R. Hunt, P. Lund, T. Ovitt, J. R. Standen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The suitability of using an image console monitor for interpretation of adult portable chest radiographs was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and subjective techniques. METHODS. Radiologists read 80 chest images, once on a display monitor and once on computed radiography film, for the presence or absence of pneumothorax or atelectasis. Judgments of correct or incorrect positions of tubes and lines were reported, and total viewing time was recorded. RESULTS. A statistically significant difference was found in favor of monitor reading for detection of pneumothoraces. Atelectasis detection also was higher with monitor reading, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Tube/line judgments were equivalent for both modes. Total viewing time was approximately 1 minute longer per image with the monitor. CONCLUSIONS. Viewing computed radiography images on a workstation monitor does not seem to affect diagnostic accuracy compared with film viewing. Preset image defaults tailored to the individual radiologist could decrease total viewing time to acceptable levels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-146
Number of pages6
JournalInvestigative Radiology
Volume29
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

ROC Curve
Thorax
Pulmonary Atelectasis
Pneumothorax
Motion Pictures
Radiography
Reading
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Computed radiography
  • observer performance
  • visual perception
  • workstations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Krupinski, E. A., Maloney, K., Bessen, S. C., Capp, M. P., Graham, K., Hunt, R., ... Standen, J. R. (1994). Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of computer display of adult portable chest radiographs. Investigative Radiology, 29(2), 141-146.

Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of computer display of adult portable chest radiographs. / Krupinski, Elizabeth A; Maloney, K.; Bessen, S. C.; Capp, M. P.; Graham, K.; Hunt, R.; Lund, P.; Ovitt, T.; Standen, J. R.

In: Investigative Radiology, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1994, p. 141-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krupinski, EA, Maloney, K, Bessen, SC, Capp, MP, Graham, K, Hunt, R, Lund, P, Ovitt, T & Standen, JR 1994, 'Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of computer display of adult portable chest radiographs', Investigative Radiology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 141-146.
Krupinski, Elizabeth A ; Maloney, K. ; Bessen, S. C. ; Capp, M. P. ; Graham, K. ; Hunt, R. ; Lund, P. ; Ovitt, T. ; Standen, J. R. / Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of computer display of adult portable chest radiographs. In: Investigative Radiology. 1994 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 141-146.
@article{9e0958456dfd44cfba143ca54803e4b3,
title = "Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of computer display of adult portable chest radiographs",
abstract = "RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The suitability of using an image console monitor for interpretation of adult portable chest radiographs was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and subjective techniques. METHODS. Radiologists read 80 chest images, once on a display monitor and once on computed radiography film, for the presence or absence of pneumothorax or atelectasis. Judgments of correct or incorrect positions of tubes and lines were reported, and total viewing time was recorded. RESULTS. A statistically significant difference was found in favor of monitor reading for detection of pneumothoraces. Atelectasis detection also was higher with monitor reading, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Tube/line judgments were equivalent for both modes. Total viewing time was approximately 1 minute longer per image with the monitor. CONCLUSIONS. Viewing computed radiography images on a workstation monitor does not seem to affect diagnostic accuracy compared with film viewing. Preset image defaults tailored to the individual radiologist could decrease total viewing time to acceptable levels.",
keywords = "Computed radiography, observer performance, visual perception, workstations",
author = "Krupinski, {Elizabeth A} and K. Maloney and Bessen, {S. C.} and Capp, {M. P.} and K. Graham and R. Hunt and P. Lund and T. Ovitt and Standen, {J. R.}",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "141--146",
journal = "Investigative Radiology",
issn = "0020-9996",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of computer display of adult portable chest radiographs

AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A

AU - Maloney, K.

AU - Bessen, S. C.

AU - Capp, M. P.

AU - Graham, K.

AU - Hunt, R.

AU - Lund, P.

AU - Ovitt, T.

AU - Standen, J. R.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The suitability of using an image console monitor for interpretation of adult portable chest radiographs was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and subjective techniques. METHODS. Radiologists read 80 chest images, once on a display monitor and once on computed radiography film, for the presence or absence of pneumothorax or atelectasis. Judgments of correct or incorrect positions of tubes and lines were reported, and total viewing time was recorded. RESULTS. A statistically significant difference was found in favor of monitor reading for detection of pneumothoraces. Atelectasis detection also was higher with monitor reading, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Tube/line judgments were equivalent for both modes. Total viewing time was approximately 1 minute longer per image with the monitor. CONCLUSIONS. Viewing computed radiography images on a workstation monitor does not seem to affect diagnostic accuracy compared with film viewing. Preset image defaults tailored to the individual radiologist could decrease total viewing time to acceptable levels.

AB - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The suitability of using an image console monitor for interpretation of adult portable chest radiographs was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and subjective techniques. METHODS. Radiologists read 80 chest images, once on a display monitor and once on computed radiography film, for the presence or absence of pneumothorax or atelectasis. Judgments of correct or incorrect positions of tubes and lines were reported, and total viewing time was recorded. RESULTS. A statistically significant difference was found in favor of monitor reading for detection of pneumothoraces. Atelectasis detection also was higher with monitor reading, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Tube/line judgments were equivalent for both modes. Total viewing time was approximately 1 minute longer per image with the monitor. CONCLUSIONS. Viewing computed radiography images on a workstation monitor does not seem to affect diagnostic accuracy compared with film viewing. Preset image defaults tailored to the individual radiologist could decrease total viewing time to acceptable levels.

KW - Computed radiography

KW - observer performance

KW - visual perception

KW - workstations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028331807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028331807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 141

EP - 146

JO - Investigative Radiology

JF - Investigative Radiology

SN - 0020-9996

IS - 2

ER -