Reconciling PM10 analyses by different sampling methods for Iron King Mine tailings dust

Xu Li, Omar I. Félix, Patricia Gonzales, Avelino E Saez, Wendell P Ela

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The overall project objective at the Iron King Mine Superfund site is to determine the level and potential risk associated with heavy metal exposure of the proximate population emanating from the site's tailings pile. To provide sufficient size-fractioned dust for multidiscipline research studies, a dust generator was built and is now being used to generate size-fractioned dust samples for toxicity investigations using in vitro cell culture and animal exposure experiments as well as studies on geochemical characterization and bioassay solubilization with simulated lung and gastric fluid extractants. The objective of this study is to provide a robust method for source identification by comparing the tailing sample produced by dust generator and that collected by MOUDI sampler. As and Pb concentrations of the PM10 fraction in the MOUDI sample were much lower than in tailing samples produced by the dust generator, indicating a dilution of Iron King tailing dust by dust from other sources. For source apportionment purposes, single element concentration method was used based on the assumption that the PM10 fraction comes from a background source plus the Iron King tailing source. The method's conclusion that nearly all arsenic and lead in the PM10 dust fraction originated from the tailings substantiates our previous Pb and Sr isotope study conclusion. As and Pb showed a similar mass fraction from Iron King for all sites suggesting that As and Pb have the same major emission source. Further validation of this simple source apportionment method is needed based on other elements and sites.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-41
Number of pages5
JournalReviews on Environmental Health
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Iron mines
Tailings
Dust
Iron
Sampling
animal
Bioassay
experiment
Arsenic
Heavy Metals
Cell culture
Isotopes
Biological Assay
Dilution
Heavy metals
Piles
Toxicity
Stomach
Animals
Cell Culture Techniques

Keywords

  • Arsenic
  • Dust generator
  • Lead
  • MOUDI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Pollution
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Reconciling PM10 analyses by different sampling methods for Iron King Mine tailings dust. / Li, Xu; Félix, Omar I.; Gonzales, Patricia; Saez, Avelino E; Ela, Wendell P.

In: Reviews on Environmental Health, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 37-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{65bcbbc8d06949f5a09509513a33dc83,
title = "Reconciling PM10 analyses by different sampling methods for Iron King Mine tailings dust",
abstract = "The overall project objective at the Iron King Mine Superfund site is to determine the level and potential risk associated with heavy metal exposure of the proximate population emanating from the site's tailings pile. To provide sufficient size-fractioned dust for multidiscipline research studies, a dust generator was built and is now being used to generate size-fractioned dust samples for toxicity investigations using in vitro cell culture and animal exposure experiments as well as studies on geochemical characterization and bioassay solubilization with simulated lung and gastric fluid extractants. The objective of this study is to provide a robust method for source identification by comparing the tailing sample produced by dust generator and that collected by MOUDI sampler. As and Pb concentrations of the PM10 fraction in the MOUDI sample were much lower than in tailing samples produced by the dust generator, indicating a dilution of Iron King tailing dust by dust from other sources. For source apportionment purposes, single element concentration method was used based on the assumption that the PM10 fraction comes from a background source plus the Iron King tailing source. The method's conclusion that nearly all arsenic and lead in the PM10 dust fraction originated from the tailings substantiates our previous Pb and Sr isotope study conclusion. As and Pb showed a similar mass fraction from Iron King for all sites suggesting that As and Pb have the same major emission source. Further validation of this simple source apportionment method is needed based on other elements and sites.",
keywords = "Arsenic, Dust generator, Lead, MOUDI",
author = "Xu Li and F{\'e}lix, {Omar I.} and Patricia Gonzales and Saez, {Avelino E} and Ela, {Wendell P}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/reveh-2015-0060",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "37--41",
journal = "Reviews on Environmental Health",
issn = "0048-7554",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconciling PM10 analyses by different sampling methods for Iron King Mine tailings dust

AU - Li, Xu

AU - Félix, Omar I.

AU - Gonzales, Patricia

AU - Saez, Avelino E

AU - Ela, Wendell P

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - The overall project objective at the Iron King Mine Superfund site is to determine the level and potential risk associated with heavy metal exposure of the proximate population emanating from the site's tailings pile. To provide sufficient size-fractioned dust for multidiscipline research studies, a dust generator was built and is now being used to generate size-fractioned dust samples for toxicity investigations using in vitro cell culture and animal exposure experiments as well as studies on geochemical characterization and bioassay solubilization with simulated lung and gastric fluid extractants. The objective of this study is to provide a robust method for source identification by comparing the tailing sample produced by dust generator and that collected by MOUDI sampler. As and Pb concentrations of the PM10 fraction in the MOUDI sample were much lower than in tailing samples produced by the dust generator, indicating a dilution of Iron King tailing dust by dust from other sources. For source apportionment purposes, single element concentration method was used based on the assumption that the PM10 fraction comes from a background source plus the Iron King tailing source. The method's conclusion that nearly all arsenic and lead in the PM10 dust fraction originated from the tailings substantiates our previous Pb and Sr isotope study conclusion. As and Pb showed a similar mass fraction from Iron King for all sites suggesting that As and Pb have the same major emission source. Further validation of this simple source apportionment method is needed based on other elements and sites.

AB - The overall project objective at the Iron King Mine Superfund site is to determine the level and potential risk associated with heavy metal exposure of the proximate population emanating from the site's tailings pile. To provide sufficient size-fractioned dust for multidiscipline research studies, a dust generator was built and is now being used to generate size-fractioned dust samples for toxicity investigations using in vitro cell culture and animal exposure experiments as well as studies on geochemical characterization and bioassay solubilization with simulated lung and gastric fluid extractants. The objective of this study is to provide a robust method for source identification by comparing the tailing sample produced by dust generator and that collected by MOUDI sampler. As and Pb concentrations of the PM10 fraction in the MOUDI sample were much lower than in tailing samples produced by the dust generator, indicating a dilution of Iron King tailing dust by dust from other sources. For source apportionment purposes, single element concentration method was used based on the assumption that the PM10 fraction comes from a background source plus the Iron King tailing source. The method's conclusion that nearly all arsenic and lead in the PM10 dust fraction originated from the tailings substantiates our previous Pb and Sr isotope study conclusion. As and Pb showed a similar mass fraction from Iron King for all sites suggesting that As and Pb have the same major emission source. Further validation of this simple source apportionment method is needed based on other elements and sites.

KW - Arsenic

KW - Dust generator

KW - Lead

KW - MOUDI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962635417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962635417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/reveh-2015-0060

DO - 10.1515/reveh-2015-0060

M3 - Article

C2 - 26820180

AN - SCOPUS:84962635417

VL - 31

SP - 37

EP - 41

JO - Reviews on Environmental Health

JF - Reviews on Environmental Health

SN - 0048-7554

IS - 1

ER -