Reconstructing phylogenies from allozyme data: Comparing method performance with congruence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Allozyme data are widely used to infer the phylogenies of populations and closely-related species. Numerous parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods have been proposed for phylogenetic analysis of these data; the relative merits of these methods have been debated vigorously, but their accuracy has not been well explored. In this study, I compare the performance of 13 phylogenetic methods (six parsimony, six distance, and continuous maximum likelihood) by applying a congruence approach to eight allozyme data sets from the literature. Clades are identified that are supported by multiple data sets other than allozymes (e.g. morphology, DNA sequences), and the ability of different methods to recover these 'known' clades is compared. The results suggest that (1) distance and likelihood methods generally outperform parsimony methods, (2) methods that utilize frequency data tend to perform well, and (3) continuous maximum likelihood is among the most accurate methods, and appears to be robust to violations of its assumptions. These results are in agreement with those from recent simulation studies, and help provide a basis for empirical workers to choose among the many methods available for analysing allozyme characters. (C) 2000 The Linnean Society of London.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)613-632
Number of pages20
JournalBiological Journal of the Linnean Society
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Phylogeny
allozyme
allozymes
Isoenzymes
phylogeny
methodology
phylogenetics
method
nucleotide sequences
DNA

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Distance methods
  • Frequency data
  • Maximum likelihood
  • Parsimony methods
  • Polymorphic characters

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

@article{0ff6ed958958429287569449e153407f,
title = "Reconstructing phylogenies from allozyme data: Comparing method performance with congruence",
abstract = "Allozyme data are widely used to infer the phylogenies of populations and closely-related species. Numerous parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods have been proposed for phylogenetic analysis of these data; the relative merits of these methods have been debated vigorously, but their accuracy has not been well explored. In this study, I compare the performance of 13 phylogenetic methods (six parsimony, six distance, and continuous maximum likelihood) by applying a congruence approach to eight allozyme data sets from the literature. Clades are identified that are supported by multiple data sets other than allozymes (e.g. morphology, DNA sequences), and the ability of different methods to recover these 'known' clades is compared. The results suggest that (1) distance and likelihood methods generally outperform parsimony methods, (2) methods that utilize frequency data tend to perform well, and (3) continuous maximum likelihood is among the most accurate methods, and appears to be robust to violations of its assumptions. These results are in agreement with those from recent simulation studies, and help provide a basis for empirical workers to choose among the many methods available for analysing allozyme characters. (C) 2000 The Linnean Society of London.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Distance methods, Frequency data, Maximum likelihood, Parsimony methods, Polymorphic characters",
author = "Wiens, {John J}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1006/bijl.1999.0420",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "613--632",
journal = "Biological Journal of the Linnean Society",
issn = "0024-4066",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconstructing phylogenies from allozyme data

T2 - Comparing method performance with congruence

AU - Wiens, John J

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Allozyme data are widely used to infer the phylogenies of populations and closely-related species. Numerous parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods have been proposed for phylogenetic analysis of these data; the relative merits of these methods have been debated vigorously, but their accuracy has not been well explored. In this study, I compare the performance of 13 phylogenetic methods (six parsimony, six distance, and continuous maximum likelihood) by applying a congruence approach to eight allozyme data sets from the literature. Clades are identified that are supported by multiple data sets other than allozymes (e.g. morphology, DNA sequences), and the ability of different methods to recover these 'known' clades is compared. The results suggest that (1) distance and likelihood methods generally outperform parsimony methods, (2) methods that utilize frequency data tend to perform well, and (3) continuous maximum likelihood is among the most accurate methods, and appears to be robust to violations of its assumptions. These results are in agreement with those from recent simulation studies, and help provide a basis for empirical workers to choose among the many methods available for analysing allozyme characters. (C) 2000 The Linnean Society of London.

AB - Allozyme data are widely used to infer the phylogenies of populations and closely-related species. Numerous parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods have been proposed for phylogenetic analysis of these data; the relative merits of these methods have been debated vigorously, but their accuracy has not been well explored. In this study, I compare the performance of 13 phylogenetic methods (six parsimony, six distance, and continuous maximum likelihood) by applying a congruence approach to eight allozyme data sets from the literature. Clades are identified that are supported by multiple data sets other than allozymes (e.g. morphology, DNA sequences), and the ability of different methods to recover these 'known' clades is compared. The results suggest that (1) distance and likelihood methods generally outperform parsimony methods, (2) methods that utilize frequency data tend to perform well, and (3) continuous maximum likelihood is among the most accurate methods, and appears to be robust to violations of its assumptions. These results are in agreement with those from recent simulation studies, and help provide a basis for empirical workers to choose among the many methods available for analysing allozyme characters. (C) 2000 The Linnean Society of London.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Distance methods

KW - Frequency data

KW - Maximum likelihood

KW - Parsimony methods

KW - Polymorphic characters

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033826678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033826678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/bijl.1999.0420

DO - 10.1006/bijl.1999.0420

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033826678

VL - 70

SP - 613

EP - 632

JO - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

JF - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

SN - 0024-4066

IS - 4

ER -