Recovery of spatial learning deficits after decay of electrically induced synaptic enhancement in the hippocampus

C. A. Castro, L. H. Silbert, B. L. McNaughton, Carol A Barnes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

141 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A WIDESPREAD interest in a long-lasting form of synaptic enhancement in hippocampal circuits1,2 has arisen largely because it might reflect the activation of physiological mechanisms that underlie rapid associative learning. As its induction normally requires the 'Hebbian'3 association of activity on a number of input fibres4, we refer to the process as long-term enhancement (LTE) rather than long-term potentiation (LTP), to emphasize its distinction from the ubiquitous, non-associative 'potentiation' phenomena that occur at most synapses, including those exhibiting LTE5. Among other evidence6-8 that LTE might actually have a role in associative memory is the demonstration that repeated high-frequency stimulation, which saturated the induceable LTE, caused a severe deficit in spatial learning, although it had no effect on well established spatial memory9. These results were consistent with a widespread view that information need only temporarily be stored in the hippocampal formation in order for long-term memories to be established in neocortical circuits10,11. In this context, it is important to understand whether the possible underly-ing synaptic changes are of a permanent character, or are relatively transient. A second question is whether the actual cause of the observed learning deficit is the distruption of the synaptic weight distribution, and/or the limitation of further synaptic change, which presumably results from experimental saturation of the LTE mechanism. Alternatively, the deficit could be a consequence of some unobserved secondary effect of the high-frequency electrical stimulation. Here we demonstrate that learning capacity recovers in about the same time that it takes LTE to decay, which strongly favours the first possibility and supports the idea that LTE-like processes actually underlie associative memory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)545-548
Number of pages4
JournalNature
Volume342
Issue number6249
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hippocampus
Learning
Long-Term Memory
Long-Term Potentiation
Synapses
Electric Stimulation
Weights and Measures
Spatial Learning
leukotriene E5

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Recovery of spatial learning deficits after decay of electrically induced synaptic enhancement in the hippocampus. / Castro, C. A.; Silbert, L. H.; McNaughton, B. L.; Barnes, Carol A.

In: Nature, Vol. 342, No. 6249, 1989, p. 545-548.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Castro, C. A. ; Silbert, L. H. ; McNaughton, B. L. ; Barnes, Carol A. / Recovery of spatial learning deficits after decay of electrically induced synaptic enhancement in the hippocampus. In: Nature. 1989 ; Vol. 342, No. 6249. pp. 545-548.
@article{8bc65b98c41645d9b1718d3eca8d1c57,
title = "Recovery of spatial learning deficits after decay of electrically induced synaptic enhancement in the hippocampus",
abstract = "A WIDESPREAD interest in a long-lasting form of synaptic enhancement in hippocampal circuits1,2 has arisen largely because it might reflect the activation of physiological mechanisms that underlie rapid associative learning. As its induction normally requires the 'Hebbian'3 association of activity on a number of input fibres4, we refer to the process as long-term enhancement (LTE) rather than long-term potentiation (LTP), to emphasize its distinction from the ubiquitous, non-associative 'potentiation' phenomena that occur at most synapses, including those exhibiting LTE5. Among other evidence6-8 that LTE might actually have a role in associative memory is the demonstration that repeated high-frequency stimulation, which saturated the induceable LTE, caused a severe deficit in spatial learning, although it had no effect on well established spatial memory9. These results were consistent with a widespread view that information need only temporarily be stored in the hippocampal formation in order for long-term memories to be established in neocortical circuits10,11. In this context, it is important to understand whether the possible underly-ing synaptic changes are of a permanent character, or are relatively transient. A second question is whether the actual cause of the observed learning deficit is the distruption of the synaptic weight distribution, and/or the limitation of further synaptic change, which presumably results from experimental saturation of the LTE mechanism. Alternatively, the deficit could be a consequence of some unobserved secondary effect of the high-frequency electrical stimulation. Here we demonstrate that learning capacity recovers in about the same time that it takes LTE to decay, which strongly favours the first possibility and supports the idea that LTE-like processes actually underlie associative memory.",
author = "Castro, {C. A.} and Silbert, {L. H.} and McNaughton, {B. L.} and Barnes, {Carol A}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "342",
pages = "545--548",
journal = "Nature",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6249",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recovery of spatial learning deficits after decay of electrically induced synaptic enhancement in the hippocampus

AU - Castro, C. A.

AU - Silbert, L. H.

AU - McNaughton, B. L.

AU - Barnes, Carol A

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - A WIDESPREAD interest in a long-lasting form of synaptic enhancement in hippocampal circuits1,2 has arisen largely because it might reflect the activation of physiological mechanisms that underlie rapid associative learning. As its induction normally requires the 'Hebbian'3 association of activity on a number of input fibres4, we refer to the process as long-term enhancement (LTE) rather than long-term potentiation (LTP), to emphasize its distinction from the ubiquitous, non-associative 'potentiation' phenomena that occur at most synapses, including those exhibiting LTE5. Among other evidence6-8 that LTE might actually have a role in associative memory is the demonstration that repeated high-frequency stimulation, which saturated the induceable LTE, caused a severe deficit in spatial learning, although it had no effect on well established spatial memory9. These results were consistent with a widespread view that information need only temporarily be stored in the hippocampal formation in order for long-term memories to be established in neocortical circuits10,11. In this context, it is important to understand whether the possible underly-ing synaptic changes are of a permanent character, or are relatively transient. A second question is whether the actual cause of the observed learning deficit is the distruption of the synaptic weight distribution, and/or the limitation of further synaptic change, which presumably results from experimental saturation of the LTE mechanism. Alternatively, the deficit could be a consequence of some unobserved secondary effect of the high-frequency electrical stimulation. Here we demonstrate that learning capacity recovers in about the same time that it takes LTE to decay, which strongly favours the first possibility and supports the idea that LTE-like processes actually underlie associative memory.

AB - A WIDESPREAD interest in a long-lasting form of synaptic enhancement in hippocampal circuits1,2 has arisen largely because it might reflect the activation of physiological mechanisms that underlie rapid associative learning. As its induction normally requires the 'Hebbian'3 association of activity on a number of input fibres4, we refer to the process as long-term enhancement (LTE) rather than long-term potentiation (LTP), to emphasize its distinction from the ubiquitous, non-associative 'potentiation' phenomena that occur at most synapses, including those exhibiting LTE5. Among other evidence6-8 that LTE might actually have a role in associative memory is the demonstration that repeated high-frequency stimulation, which saturated the induceable LTE, caused a severe deficit in spatial learning, although it had no effect on well established spatial memory9. These results were consistent with a widespread view that information need only temporarily be stored in the hippocampal formation in order for long-term memories to be established in neocortical circuits10,11. In this context, it is important to understand whether the possible underly-ing synaptic changes are of a permanent character, or are relatively transient. A second question is whether the actual cause of the observed learning deficit is the distruption of the synaptic weight distribution, and/or the limitation of further synaptic change, which presumably results from experimental saturation of the LTE mechanism. Alternatively, the deficit could be a consequence of some unobserved secondary effect of the high-frequency electrical stimulation. Here we demonstrate that learning capacity recovers in about the same time that it takes LTE to decay, which strongly favours the first possibility and supports the idea that LTE-like processes actually underlie associative memory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024350999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024350999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2586626

AN - SCOPUS:0024350999

VL - 342

SP - 545

EP - 548

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

IS - 6249

ER -