Recreation economics to inform migratory species conservation: Case study of the northern pintail

Brady J. Mattsson, James A. Dubovsky, Wayne E. Thogmartin, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Joshua H. Goldstein, John B. Loomis, James E. Diffendorfer, Darius J. Semmens, Ruscena Wiederholt, Laura López-Hoffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quantification of the economic value provided by migratory species can aid in targeting management efforts and funding to locations yielding the greatest benefits to society and species conservation. Here we illustrate a key step in this process by estimating hunting and birding values of the northern pintail (Anas acuta) within primary breeding and wintering habitats used during the species’ annual migratory cycle in North America. We used published information on user expenditures and net economic values (consumer surplus) for recreational viewing and hunting to determine the economic value of pintail-based recreation in three primary breeding areas and two primary wintering areas. Summed expenditures and consumer surplus for northern pintail viewing were annually valued at $70M, and annual sport hunting totaled $31M (2014 USD). Expenditures for viewing ($42M) were more than twice as high than those for hunting ($18M). Estimates of consumer surplus, defined as the amount consumers are willing to pay above their current expenditures, were $15M greater for viewing ($28M) than for hunting ($13M). We discovered substantial annual consumer surplus ($41M) available for pintail conservation from birders and hunters. We also found spatial differences in economic value among the primary regions used by pintails, with viewing generally valued more in breeding regions than in wintering regions and the reverse being true for hunting. The economic value of pintail-based recreation in the Western wintering region ($26M) exceeded that in any other region by at least a factor of three. Our approach of developing regionally explicit economic values can be extended to other taxonomic groups, and is particularly suitable for migratory game birds because of the availability of large amounts of data. When combined with habitat-linked population models, regionally explicit values could inform development of more effective conservation finance and policy mechanisms to enhance environmental management and societal benefits across the geographically dispersed areas used by migratory species.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)971-979
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume206
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2018

Fingerprint

migratory species
species conservation
hunting
Conservation
Economics
expenditure
economics
breeding
Environmental management
Birds
habitat
Finance
Sports
sport
finance
environmental management
targeting
recreation
Availability
bird

Keywords

  • Birding
  • Migratory species conservation
  • North America
  • Northern pintail
  • Recreation economics
  • Waterfowl hunting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Recreation economics to inform migratory species conservation : Case study of the northern pintail. / Mattsson, Brady J.; Dubovsky, James A.; Thogmartin, Wayne E.; Bagstad, Kenneth J.; Goldstein, Joshua H.; Loomis, John B.; Diffendorfer, James E.; Semmens, Darius J.; Wiederholt, Ruscena; López-Hoffman, Laura.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 206, 15.01.2018, p. 971-979.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mattsson, BJ, Dubovsky, JA, Thogmartin, WE, Bagstad, KJ, Goldstein, JH, Loomis, JB, Diffendorfer, JE, Semmens, DJ, Wiederholt, R & López-Hoffman, L 2018, 'Recreation economics to inform migratory species conservation: Case study of the northern pintail', Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 206, pp. 971-979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.048
Mattsson, Brady J. ; Dubovsky, James A. ; Thogmartin, Wayne E. ; Bagstad, Kenneth J. ; Goldstein, Joshua H. ; Loomis, John B. ; Diffendorfer, James E. ; Semmens, Darius J. ; Wiederholt, Ruscena ; López-Hoffman, Laura. / Recreation economics to inform migratory species conservation : Case study of the northern pintail. In: Journal of Environmental Management. 2018 ; Vol. 206. pp. 971-979.
@article{de3f861c51914fd79a9926b860739df1,
title = "Recreation economics to inform migratory species conservation: Case study of the northern pintail",
abstract = "Quantification of the economic value provided by migratory species can aid in targeting management efforts and funding to locations yielding the greatest benefits to society and species conservation. Here we illustrate a key step in this process by estimating hunting and birding values of the northern pintail (Anas acuta) within primary breeding and wintering habitats used during the species’ annual migratory cycle in North America. We used published information on user expenditures and net economic values (consumer surplus) for recreational viewing and hunting to determine the economic value of pintail-based recreation in three primary breeding areas and two primary wintering areas. Summed expenditures and consumer surplus for northern pintail viewing were annually valued at $70M, and annual sport hunting totaled $31M (2014 USD). Expenditures for viewing ($42M) were more than twice as high than those for hunting ($18M). Estimates of consumer surplus, defined as the amount consumers are willing to pay above their current expenditures, were $15M greater for viewing ($28M) than for hunting ($13M). We discovered substantial annual consumer surplus ($41M) available for pintail conservation from birders and hunters. We also found spatial differences in economic value among the primary regions used by pintails, with viewing generally valued more in breeding regions than in wintering regions and the reverse being true for hunting. The economic value of pintail-based recreation in the Western wintering region ($26M) exceeded that in any other region by at least a factor of three. Our approach of developing regionally explicit economic values can be extended to other taxonomic groups, and is particularly suitable for migratory game birds because of the availability of large amounts of data. When combined with habitat-linked population models, regionally explicit values could inform development of more effective conservation finance and policy mechanisms to enhance environmental management and societal benefits across the geographically dispersed areas used by migratory species.",
keywords = "Birding, Migratory species conservation, North America, Northern pintail, Recreation economics, Waterfowl hunting",
author = "Mattsson, {Brady J.} and Dubovsky, {James A.} and Thogmartin, {Wayne E.} and Bagstad, {Kenneth J.} and Goldstein, {Joshua H.} and Loomis, {John B.} and Diffendorfer, {James E.} and Semmens, {Darius J.} and Ruscena Wiederholt and Laura L{\'o}pez-Hoffman",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "206",
pages = "971--979",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recreation economics to inform migratory species conservation

T2 - Case study of the northern pintail

AU - Mattsson, Brady J.

AU - Dubovsky, James A.

AU - Thogmartin, Wayne E.

AU - Bagstad, Kenneth J.

AU - Goldstein, Joshua H.

AU - Loomis, John B.

AU - Diffendorfer, James E.

AU - Semmens, Darius J.

AU - Wiederholt, Ruscena

AU - López-Hoffman, Laura

PY - 2018/1/15

Y1 - 2018/1/15

N2 - Quantification of the economic value provided by migratory species can aid in targeting management efforts and funding to locations yielding the greatest benefits to society and species conservation. Here we illustrate a key step in this process by estimating hunting and birding values of the northern pintail (Anas acuta) within primary breeding and wintering habitats used during the species’ annual migratory cycle in North America. We used published information on user expenditures and net economic values (consumer surplus) for recreational viewing and hunting to determine the economic value of pintail-based recreation in three primary breeding areas and two primary wintering areas. Summed expenditures and consumer surplus for northern pintail viewing were annually valued at $70M, and annual sport hunting totaled $31M (2014 USD). Expenditures for viewing ($42M) were more than twice as high than those for hunting ($18M). Estimates of consumer surplus, defined as the amount consumers are willing to pay above their current expenditures, were $15M greater for viewing ($28M) than for hunting ($13M). We discovered substantial annual consumer surplus ($41M) available for pintail conservation from birders and hunters. We also found spatial differences in economic value among the primary regions used by pintails, with viewing generally valued more in breeding regions than in wintering regions and the reverse being true for hunting. The economic value of pintail-based recreation in the Western wintering region ($26M) exceeded that in any other region by at least a factor of three. Our approach of developing regionally explicit economic values can be extended to other taxonomic groups, and is particularly suitable for migratory game birds because of the availability of large amounts of data. When combined with habitat-linked population models, regionally explicit values could inform development of more effective conservation finance and policy mechanisms to enhance environmental management and societal benefits across the geographically dispersed areas used by migratory species.

AB - Quantification of the economic value provided by migratory species can aid in targeting management efforts and funding to locations yielding the greatest benefits to society and species conservation. Here we illustrate a key step in this process by estimating hunting and birding values of the northern pintail (Anas acuta) within primary breeding and wintering habitats used during the species’ annual migratory cycle in North America. We used published information on user expenditures and net economic values (consumer surplus) for recreational viewing and hunting to determine the economic value of pintail-based recreation in three primary breeding areas and two primary wintering areas. Summed expenditures and consumer surplus for northern pintail viewing were annually valued at $70M, and annual sport hunting totaled $31M (2014 USD). Expenditures for viewing ($42M) were more than twice as high than those for hunting ($18M). Estimates of consumer surplus, defined as the amount consumers are willing to pay above their current expenditures, were $15M greater for viewing ($28M) than for hunting ($13M). We discovered substantial annual consumer surplus ($41M) available for pintail conservation from birders and hunters. We also found spatial differences in economic value among the primary regions used by pintails, with viewing generally valued more in breeding regions than in wintering regions and the reverse being true for hunting. The economic value of pintail-based recreation in the Western wintering region ($26M) exceeded that in any other region by at least a factor of three. Our approach of developing regionally explicit economic values can be extended to other taxonomic groups, and is particularly suitable for migratory game birds because of the availability of large amounts of data. When combined with habitat-linked population models, regionally explicit values could inform development of more effective conservation finance and policy mechanisms to enhance environmental management and societal benefits across the geographically dispersed areas used by migratory species.

KW - Birding

KW - Migratory species conservation

KW - North America

KW - Northern pintail

KW - Recreation economics

KW - Waterfowl hunting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037330998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037330998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.048

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.048

M3 - Article

C2 - 29223107

AN - SCOPUS:85037330998

VL - 206

SP - 971

EP - 979

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

ER -