Recruitment limitation

A theoretical perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A theoretical analysis of the concept of recruitment limitation leads to the conclusion that most populations should be regarded as jointly limited by recruitment and interactions between individuals after recruitment. The open nature of local marine systems does not permit avoidance of density-dependent interactions; it simply may make them more difficult to detect. Local populations consisting of settled organisms may not experience density-dependent interactions under some circumstances, but the entire species population consisting of the collection of local populations and their planktonic larvae must have density-dependent dynamics. Any local population of settled individuals can escape density dependence if sufficient density dependence occurs among planktonic larvae or within other local populations. Common conceptions of density dependence are too narrow, leading too often to the conclusion that it is absent from a system. It is equally wrong to expect that density-dependent interactions after settlement determine local population densities independently of recruitment. Special circumstances allowing density dependence to act strongly and quickly are needed before density dependence can neutralize the effects of recruitment. Recruitment limitation and density-dependent interactions therefore should not be regarded as alternatives but as jointly acting to determine the densities of marine benthic populations. Moreover, the interaction between fluctuating recruitment and density dependence is potentially the most interesting feature of recruitment limitation. For example, this interaction may be an important diversity-maintaining mechanism for marine systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)234-240
Number of pages7
JournalAustral Ecology
Volume23
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

density dependence
larva
population density
larvae
organisms

Keywords

  • Density dependence
  • Equilibrium
  • Larval supply
  • Recruitment fluctuations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Recruitment limitation : A theoretical perspective. / Chesson, Peter.

In: Austral Ecology, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1998, p. 234-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{12faaa3fa9d54f4ea8be1be28408d984,
title = "Recruitment limitation: A theoretical perspective",
abstract = "A theoretical analysis of the concept of recruitment limitation leads to the conclusion that most populations should be regarded as jointly limited by recruitment and interactions between individuals after recruitment. The open nature of local marine systems does not permit avoidance of density-dependent interactions; it simply may make them more difficult to detect. Local populations consisting of settled organisms may not experience density-dependent interactions under some circumstances, but the entire species population consisting of the collection of local populations and their planktonic larvae must have density-dependent dynamics. Any local population of settled individuals can escape density dependence if sufficient density dependence occurs among planktonic larvae or within other local populations. Common conceptions of density dependence are too narrow, leading too often to the conclusion that it is absent from a system. It is equally wrong to expect that density-dependent interactions after settlement determine local population densities independently of recruitment. Special circumstances allowing density dependence to act strongly and quickly are needed before density dependence can neutralize the effects of recruitment. Recruitment limitation and density-dependent interactions therefore should not be regarded as alternatives but as jointly acting to determine the densities of marine benthic populations. Moreover, the interaction between fluctuating recruitment and density dependence is potentially the most interesting feature of recruitment limitation. For example, this interaction may be an important diversity-maintaining mechanism for marine systems.",
keywords = "Density dependence, Equilibrium, Larval supply, Recruitment fluctuations",
author = "Peter Chesson",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "234--240",
journal = "Austral Ecology",
issn = "1442-9985",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recruitment limitation

T2 - A theoretical perspective

AU - Chesson, Peter

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - A theoretical analysis of the concept of recruitment limitation leads to the conclusion that most populations should be regarded as jointly limited by recruitment and interactions between individuals after recruitment. The open nature of local marine systems does not permit avoidance of density-dependent interactions; it simply may make them more difficult to detect. Local populations consisting of settled organisms may not experience density-dependent interactions under some circumstances, but the entire species population consisting of the collection of local populations and their planktonic larvae must have density-dependent dynamics. Any local population of settled individuals can escape density dependence if sufficient density dependence occurs among planktonic larvae or within other local populations. Common conceptions of density dependence are too narrow, leading too often to the conclusion that it is absent from a system. It is equally wrong to expect that density-dependent interactions after settlement determine local population densities independently of recruitment. Special circumstances allowing density dependence to act strongly and quickly are needed before density dependence can neutralize the effects of recruitment. Recruitment limitation and density-dependent interactions therefore should not be regarded as alternatives but as jointly acting to determine the densities of marine benthic populations. Moreover, the interaction between fluctuating recruitment and density dependence is potentially the most interesting feature of recruitment limitation. For example, this interaction may be an important diversity-maintaining mechanism for marine systems.

AB - A theoretical analysis of the concept of recruitment limitation leads to the conclusion that most populations should be regarded as jointly limited by recruitment and interactions between individuals after recruitment. The open nature of local marine systems does not permit avoidance of density-dependent interactions; it simply may make them more difficult to detect. Local populations consisting of settled organisms may not experience density-dependent interactions under some circumstances, but the entire species population consisting of the collection of local populations and their planktonic larvae must have density-dependent dynamics. Any local population of settled individuals can escape density dependence if sufficient density dependence occurs among planktonic larvae or within other local populations. Common conceptions of density dependence are too narrow, leading too often to the conclusion that it is absent from a system. It is equally wrong to expect that density-dependent interactions after settlement determine local population densities independently of recruitment. Special circumstances allowing density dependence to act strongly and quickly are needed before density dependence can neutralize the effects of recruitment. Recruitment limitation and density-dependent interactions therefore should not be regarded as alternatives but as jointly acting to determine the densities of marine benthic populations. Moreover, the interaction between fluctuating recruitment and density dependence is potentially the most interesting feature of recruitment limitation. For example, this interaction may be an important diversity-maintaining mechanism for marine systems.

KW - Density dependence

KW - Equilibrium

KW - Larval supply

KW - Recruitment fluctuations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17444380114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17444380114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 234

EP - 240

JO - Austral Ecology

JF - Austral Ecology

SN - 1442-9985

IS - 3

ER -