Recurrent evolution of herbivory in small, cold-climate lizards: Breaking the ecophysiological rules of reptilian herbivory

Robert E. Espinoza, John J Wiens, C. Richard Tracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

200 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Herbivory has evolved in many groups of vertebrates, but it is rare among both extinct and extant nonavian reptiles. Among squamate reptiles, (lizards, snakes, and their relatives), <2% of the >7,800 species are considered to be herbivorous, and herbivory is restricted to lizards. Here, we show that within a group of South American lizards (Liolaemidae, ≈170 species), herbivory has evolved more frequently than in all other squamates combined and at a rate estimated to be >55 times faster. Furthermore, in contrast to other herbivorous lizards and to existing theory, most herbivorous liolaemids are small bodied and live in cool climates. Herbivory is generally thought to evolve only in reptile species that are large bodied, live in warm climates, and maintain high body temperatures. These three well known "rules" of herbivory are considered to form the bases of physiological constraints that explain the paucity of herbivorous reptile species. We suggest that the recurrent and paradoxical evolution of herbivory in liolaemids is explained by a combination of environmental conditions (promoting independent origins of herbivory in isolated cool-climate regions), ecophysiological constraints (requiring small body size in cool climates, yet high body temperatures for herbivores), and phylogenetic history. More generally, our study demonstrates how integrating information from ecophysiology and phylogeny can help to explain macroevolutionary trends.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16819-16824
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume101
Issue number48
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 30 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cold Climate
Herbivory
Lizards
Reptiles
Climate
Body Temperature
Snakes
Body Size
Phylogeny
Vertebrates
History

Keywords

  • Ecophysiology
  • Macroevolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • General

Cite this

Recurrent evolution of herbivory in small, cold-climate lizards : Breaking the ecophysiological rules of reptilian herbivory. / Espinoza, Robert E.; Wiens, John J; Tracy, C. Richard.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 101, No. 48, 30.11.2004, p. 16819-16824.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c7b789ea3c3435da84cd32ed54058a0,
title = "Recurrent evolution of herbivory in small, cold-climate lizards: Breaking the ecophysiological rules of reptilian herbivory",
abstract = "Herbivory has evolved in many groups of vertebrates, but it is rare among both extinct and extant nonavian reptiles. Among squamate reptiles, (lizards, snakes, and their relatives), <2{\%} of the >7,800 species are considered to be herbivorous, and herbivory is restricted to lizards. Here, we show that within a group of South American lizards (Liolaemidae, ≈170 species), herbivory has evolved more frequently than in all other squamates combined and at a rate estimated to be >55 times faster. Furthermore, in contrast to other herbivorous lizards and to existing theory, most herbivorous liolaemids are small bodied and live in cool climates. Herbivory is generally thought to evolve only in reptile species that are large bodied, live in warm climates, and maintain high body temperatures. These three well known {"}rules{"} of herbivory are considered to form the bases of physiological constraints that explain the paucity of herbivorous reptile species. We suggest that the recurrent and paradoxical evolution of herbivory in liolaemids is explained by a combination of environmental conditions (promoting independent origins of herbivory in isolated cool-climate regions), ecophysiological constraints (requiring small body size in cool climates, yet high body temperatures for herbivores), and phylogenetic history. More generally, our study demonstrates how integrating information from ecophysiology and phylogeny can help to explain macroevolutionary trends.",
keywords = "Ecophysiology, Macroevolution",
author = "Espinoza, {Robert E.} and Wiens, {John J} and Tracy, {C. Richard}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.0401226101",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "16819--16824",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "48",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recurrent evolution of herbivory in small, cold-climate lizards

T2 - Breaking the ecophysiological rules of reptilian herbivory

AU - Espinoza, Robert E.

AU - Wiens, John J

AU - Tracy, C. Richard

PY - 2004/11/30

Y1 - 2004/11/30

N2 - Herbivory has evolved in many groups of vertebrates, but it is rare among both extinct and extant nonavian reptiles. Among squamate reptiles, (lizards, snakes, and their relatives), <2% of the >7,800 species are considered to be herbivorous, and herbivory is restricted to lizards. Here, we show that within a group of South American lizards (Liolaemidae, ≈170 species), herbivory has evolved more frequently than in all other squamates combined and at a rate estimated to be >55 times faster. Furthermore, in contrast to other herbivorous lizards and to existing theory, most herbivorous liolaemids are small bodied and live in cool climates. Herbivory is generally thought to evolve only in reptile species that are large bodied, live in warm climates, and maintain high body temperatures. These three well known "rules" of herbivory are considered to form the bases of physiological constraints that explain the paucity of herbivorous reptile species. We suggest that the recurrent and paradoxical evolution of herbivory in liolaemids is explained by a combination of environmental conditions (promoting independent origins of herbivory in isolated cool-climate regions), ecophysiological constraints (requiring small body size in cool climates, yet high body temperatures for herbivores), and phylogenetic history. More generally, our study demonstrates how integrating information from ecophysiology and phylogeny can help to explain macroevolutionary trends.

AB - Herbivory has evolved in many groups of vertebrates, but it is rare among both extinct and extant nonavian reptiles. Among squamate reptiles, (lizards, snakes, and their relatives), <2% of the >7,800 species are considered to be herbivorous, and herbivory is restricted to lizards. Here, we show that within a group of South American lizards (Liolaemidae, ≈170 species), herbivory has evolved more frequently than in all other squamates combined and at a rate estimated to be >55 times faster. Furthermore, in contrast to other herbivorous lizards and to existing theory, most herbivorous liolaemids are small bodied and live in cool climates. Herbivory is generally thought to evolve only in reptile species that are large bodied, live in warm climates, and maintain high body temperatures. These three well known "rules" of herbivory are considered to form the bases of physiological constraints that explain the paucity of herbivorous reptile species. We suggest that the recurrent and paradoxical evolution of herbivory in liolaemids is explained by a combination of environmental conditions (promoting independent origins of herbivory in isolated cool-climate regions), ecophysiological constraints (requiring small body size in cool climates, yet high body temperatures for herbivores), and phylogenetic history. More generally, our study demonstrates how integrating information from ecophysiology and phylogeny can help to explain macroevolutionary trends.

KW - Ecophysiology

KW - Macroevolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10044238904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10044238904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.0401226101

DO - 10.1073/pnas.0401226101

M3 - Article

C2 - 15550549

AN - SCOPUS:10044238904

VL - 101

SP - 16819

EP - 16824

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 48

ER -