Redrawing the frontiers in the age of post-publication review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Publication forms the core structure supporting the development and transmission of scientific knowledge. For this reason, it is essential that the highest standards of quality control be maintained, in particular to ensure that the information being transmitted allows reproducible replication of the described experiments, and that the interpretation of the results is sound. Quality control has traditionally involved editorial decisions based on anonymous pre-publication peer review. Post-publication review of individual articles took the lesser role since it did not feed directly back to the original literature. Rapid advances in computer and communications technologies over the last thirty years have revolutionized scientific publication, and the role and scope of post-publication review has greatly expanded. This perspective examines the ways in which pre- and post-publication peer review influence the scientific literature, and in particular how they might best be redrawn to deal with the twin problems of scientific non-reproducibility and fraud increasingly encountered at the frontiers of science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number198
JournalFrontiers in Genetics
Volume6
Issue numberJUN
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Publications
Peer Review
Quality Control
Literature
Fraud
Communication
Technology

Keywords

  • Fraudulent data
  • Internet publication
  • Post-publication review
  • Scientific misconduct
  • Scientific reproducibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Medicine
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Redrawing the frontiers in the age of post-publication review. / Galbraith, David W.

In: Frontiers in Genetics, Vol. 6, No. JUN, 198, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{95d91e2869ed4b5b91e6b731bd718350,
title = "Redrawing the frontiers in the age of post-publication review",
abstract = "Publication forms the core structure supporting the development and transmission of scientific knowledge. For this reason, it is essential that the highest standards of quality control be maintained, in particular to ensure that the information being transmitted allows reproducible replication of the described experiments, and that the interpretation of the results is sound. Quality control has traditionally involved editorial decisions based on anonymous pre-publication peer review. Post-publication review of individual articles took the lesser role since it did not feed directly back to the original literature. Rapid advances in computer and communications technologies over the last thirty years have revolutionized scientific publication, and the role and scope of post-publication review has greatly expanded. This perspective examines the ways in which pre- and post-publication peer review influence the scientific literature, and in particular how they might best be redrawn to deal with the twin problems of scientific non-reproducibility and fraud increasingly encountered at the frontiers of science.",
keywords = "Fraudulent data, Internet publication, Post-publication review, Scientific misconduct, Scientific reproducibility",
author = "Galbraith, {David W}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3389/fgene.2015.00198",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Frontiers in Genetics",
issn = "1664-8021",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "JUN",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Redrawing the frontiers in the age of post-publication review

AU - Galbraith, David W

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Publication forms the core structure supporting the development and transmission of scientific knowledge. For this reason, it is essential that the highest standards of quality control be maintained, in particular to ensure that the information being transmitted allows reproducible replication of the described experiments, and that the interpretation of the results is sound. Quality control has traditionally involved editorial decisions based on anonymous pre-publication peer review. Post-publication review of individual articles took the lesser role since it did not feed directly back to the original literature. Rapid advances in computer and communications technologies over the last thirty years have revolutionized scientific publication, and the role and scope of post-publication review has greatly expanded. This perspective examines the ways in which pre- and post-publication peer review influence the scientific literature, and in particular how they might best be redrawn to deal with the twin problems of scientific non-reproducibility and fraud increasingly encountered at the frontiers of science.

AB - Publication forms the core structure supporting the development and transmission of scientific knowledge. For this reason, it is essential that the highest standards of quality control be maintained, in particular to ensure that the information being transmitted allows reproducible replication of the described experiments, and that the interpretation of the results is sound. Quality control has traditionally involved editorial decisions based on anonymous pre-publication peer review. Post-publication review of individual articles took the lesser role since it did not feed directly back to the original literature. Rapid advances in computer and communications technologies over the last thirty years have revolutionized scientific publication, and the role and scope of post-publication review has greatly expanded. This perspective examines the ways in which pre- and post-publication peer review influence the scientific literature, and in particular how they might best be redrawn to deal with the twin problems of scientific non-reproducibility and fraud increasingly encountered at the frontiers of science.

KW - Fraudulent data

KW - Internet publication

KW - Post-publication review

KW - Scientific misconduct

KW - Scientific reproducibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940105997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940105997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fgene.2015.00198

DO - 10.3389/fgene.2015.00198

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84940105997

VL - 6

JO - Frontiers in Genetics

JF - Frontiers in Genetics

SN - 1664-8021

IS - JUN

M1 - 198

ER -