Reduced tillage systems as economical dust mitigation strategies

Ana M. Kennedy, Paul N Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Arizona is one of the first states in the nation to regulate agricultural practices in order to reduce dust emissions near urban areas. This best management practice program requires dust mitigation actions in some combination of tillage and harvest, cropland, and noncropland activities. Single pass multiple operation equipment represents a viable best management practice to reduce dust emissions fiom agricultural tillage operations. Partial budgeting and contingent valuation methods were used to estimate the potential profitability and willingness-to-adopt reduced tillage equipment, respectively. At $39 to $64 ha-1 ($16 to $26 ac -1) in long-term net benefits associated with single pass multiple operation equipment, we estimate that adoption will occur on approximately 10% to 35% of the cotton hectares. However, uncertainty over operating costs and yield variability associated with single pass multiple operation equipment may reduce this rate of adoption. As a result, most dust mitigation may occur through the reduction of the number of conventional tillage operations due to global competitive pressures and the urbanization of agricultural lands.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-69
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Soil and Water Conservation
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

reduced tillage
dust emissions
dust
tillage
mitigation
best management practices
best management practice
tillage implements
contingent valuation
operating costs
agricultural emission
conventional tillage
urbanization
urban areas
profitability
agricultural land
uncertainty
cotton
agricultural practice
urban area

Keywords

  • Best management practices
  • Dust mitigation
  • Dust pollution
  • Economic feasibility
  • Tillage systems
  • Willingness to adopt

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Soil Science
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Reduced tillage systems as economical dust mitigation strategies. / Kennedy, Ana M.; Wilson, Paul N.

In: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 61-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{41bcd5fe702d441f8d0a8cb5f85a3ccd,
title = "Reduced tillage systems as economical dust mitigation strategies",
abstract = "Arizona is one of the first states in the nation to regulate agricultural practices in order to reduce dust emissions near urban areas. This best management practice program requires dust mitigation actions in some combination of tillage and harvest, cropland, and noncropland activities. Single pass multiple operation equipment represents a viable best management practice to reduce dust emissions fiom agricultural tillage operations. Partial budgeting and contingent valuation methods were used to estimate the potential profitability and willingness-to-adopt reduced tillage equipment, respectively. At $39 to $64 ha-1 ($16 to $26 ac -1) in long-term net benefits associated with single pass multiple operation equipment, we estimate that adoption will occur on approximately 10{\%} to 35{\%} of the cotton hectares. However, uncertainty over operating costs and yield variability associated with single pass multiple operation equipment may reduce this rate of adoption. As a result, most dust mitigation may occur through the reduction of the number of conventional tillage operations due to global competitive pressures and the urbanization of agricultural lands.",
keywords = "Best management practices, Dust mitigation, Dust pollution, Economic feasibility, Tillage systems, Willingness to adopt",
author = "Kennedy, {Ana M.} and Wilson, {Paul N}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.2489/jswc.64.1.61",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "61--69",
journal = "Journal of Soils and Water Conservation",
issn = "0022-4561",
publisher = "Soil Conservation Society of America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reduced tillage systems as economical dust mitigation strategies

AU - Kennedy, Ana M.

AU - Wilson, Paul N

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Arizona is one of the first states in the nation to regulate agricultural practices in order to reduce dust emissions near urban areas. This best management practice program requires dust mitigation actions in some combination of tillage and harvest, cropland, and noncropland activities. Single pass multiple operation equipment represents a viable best management practice to reduce dust emissions fiom agricultural tillage operations. Partial budgeting and contingent valuation methods were used to estimate the potential profitability and willingness-to-adopt reduced tillage equipment, respectively. At $39 to $64 ha-1 ($16 to $26 ac -1) in long-term net benefits associated with single pass multiple operation equipment, we estimate that adoption will occur on approximately 10% to 35% of the cotton hectares. However, uncertainty over operating costs and yield variability associated with single pass multiple operation equipment may reduce this rate of adoption. As a result, most dust mitigation may occur through the reduction of the number of conventional tillage operations due to global competitive pressures and the urbanization of agricultural lands.

AB - Arizona is one of the first states in the nation to regulate agricultural practices in order to reduce dust emissions near urban areas. This best management practice program requires dust mitigation actions in some combination of tillage and harvest, cropland, and noncropland activities. Single pass multiple operation equipment represents a viable best management practice to reduce dust emissions fiom agricultural tillage operations. Partial budgeting and contingent valuation methods were used to estimate the potential profitability and willingness-to-adopt reduced tillage equipment, respectively. At $39 to $64 ha-1 ($16 to $26 ac -1) in long-term net benefits associated with single pass multiple operation equipment, we estimate that adoption will occur on approximately 10% to 35% of the cotton hectares. However, uncertainty over operating costs and yield variability associated with single pass multiple operation equipment may reduce this rate of adoption. As a result, most dust mitigation may occur through the reduction of the number of conventional tillage operations due to global competitive pressures and the urbanization of agricultural lands.

KW - Best management practices

KW - Dust mitigation

KW - Dust pollution

KW - Economic feasibility

KW - Tillage systems

KW - Willingness to adopt

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949829152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949829152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2489/jswc.64.1.61

DO - 10.2489/jswc.64.1.61

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77949829152

VL - 64

SP - 61

EP - 69

JO - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

JF - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

SN - 0022-4561

IS - 1

ER -