Reducing children's immunization distress in a primary care setting.

Anne Markey Bowen, M. M. Dammeyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare two brief, inexpensive distraction techniques for children receiving immunizations during a county-sponsored immunization clinic. Preschool children (n = 80) were assigned to a party blower intervention, a pinwheel intervention, or a control group. Nurses were instructed to use "standard instructions" for the control group, and to simply provide the distracter and encourage use, but not to spend time trying to train the child or force them to use it, for the other groups. Results of planned comparisons indicated significant party blower results in the children's ratings of reduced distress (P < .01) and the parents' ratings of having to hold their child less strongly (P = .04), and showed it to be more distracting than the pinwheel (P < .02). The overall pattern of results on all rating scales supports the efficacy of using a party blower for reducing children's immunization distress, with minimal staff training and no procedural delay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-303
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Pediatric Nursing
Volume14
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Immunization
Primary Health Care
Control Groups
Preschool Children
Parents
Nurses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Reducing children's immunization distress in a primary care setting. / Bowen, Anne Markey; Dammeyer, M. M.

In: Journal of Pediatric Nursing, Vol. 14, No. 5, 10.1999, p. 296-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b86c3463ae5e4418bd956f7f93f0e30c,
title = "Reducing children's immunization distress in a primary care setting.",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare two brief, inexpensive distraction techniques for children receiving immunizations during a county-sponsored immunization clinic. Preschool children (n = 80) were assigned to a party blower intervention, a pinwheel intervention, or a control group. Nurses were instructed to use {"}standard instructions{"} for the control group, and to simply provide the distracter and encourage use, but not to spend time trying to train the child or force them to use it, for the other groups. Results of planned comparisons indicated significant party blower results in the children's ratings of reduced distress (P < .01) and the parents' ratings of having to hold their child less strongly (P = .04), and showed it to be more distracting than the pinwheel (P < .02). The overall pattern of results on all rating scales supports the efficacy of using a party blower for reducing children's immunization distress, with minimal staff training and no procedural delay.",
author = "Bowen, {Anne Markey} and Dammeyer, {M. M.}",
year = "1999",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "296--303",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Nursing",
issn = "0882-5963",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reducing children's immunization distress in a primary care setting.

AU - Bowen, Anne Markey

AU - Dammeyer, M. M.

PY - 1999/10

Y1 - 1999/10

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare two brief, inexpensive distraction techniques for children receiving immunizations during a county-sponsored immunization clinic. Preschool children (n = 80) were assigned to a party blower intervention, a pinwheel intervention, or a control group. Nurses were instructed to use "standard instructions" for the control group, and to simply provide the distracter and encourage use, but not to spend time trying to train the child or force them to use it, for the other groups. Results of planned comparisons indicated significant party blower results in the children's ratings of reduced distress (P < .01) and the parents' ratings of having to hold their child less strongly (P = .04), and showed it to be more distracting than the pinwheel (P < .02). The overall pattern of results on all rating scales supports the efficacy of using a party blower for reducing children's immunization distress, with minimal staff training and no procedural delay.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare two brief, inexpensive distraction techniques for children receiving immunizations during a county-sponsored immunization clinic. Preschool children (n = 80) were assigned to a party blower intervention, a pinwheel intervention, or a control group. Nurses were instructed to use "standard instructions" for the control group, and to simply provide the distracter and encourage use, but not to spend time trying to train the child or force them to use it, for the other groups. Results of planned comparisons indicated significant party blower results in the children's ratings of reduced distress (P < .01) and the parents' ratings of having to hold their child less strongly (P = .04), and showed it to be more distracting than the pinwheel (P < .02). The overall pattern of results on all rating scales supports the efficacy of using a party blower for reducing children's immunization distress, with minimal staff training and no procedural delay.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033211251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033211251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 296

EP - 303

JO - Journal of Pediatric Nursing

JF - Journal of Pediatric Nursing

SN - 0882-5963

IS - 5

ER -