Reevaluating growing season length controls on net ecosystem production in evergreen conifer forests

David M. Barnard, John F. Knowles, Holly R. Barnard, Michael L. Goulden, Jia Hu, Marcy E. Litvak, Noah P. Molotch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Growing season length (GSL) is a key unifying concept in ecology that can be estimated from eddy covariance-derived estimates of net ecosystem production (NEP). Previous studies disagree on how increasing GSLs may affect NEP in evergreen coniferous forests, potentially due to the variety of methods used to quantify GSL from NEP. We calculated GSL and GSL-NEP regressions at eleven evergreen conifer sites across a broad climatic gradient in western North America using three common approaches: (1) variable length (3–7 days) regressions of day of year versus NEP, (2) a smoothed threshold approach, and (3) the carbon uptake period, followed by a new approach of a method-averaged ensemble. The GSL and the GSL-NEP relationship differed among methods, resulting in linear relationships with variable sign, slope, and statistical significance. For all combinations of sites and methods, the GSL explained between 6% and 82% of NEP with p-values ranging from 0.45 to < 0.01. These results demonstrate the variability among GSL methods and the importance of selecting an appropriate method to accurately project the ecosystem carbon cycling response to longer growing seasons in the future. To encourage this approach in future studies, we outline a series of best practices for GSL method selection depending on research goals and the annual NEP dynamics of the study site(s). These results contribute to understanding growing season dynamics at ecosystem and continental scales and underscore the potential for methodological variability to influence forecasts of the evergreen conifer forest response to climate variability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number17973
JournalScientific reports
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Coniferophyta
Ecosystem
Forests
Carbon
North America
Ecology
Climate
Practice Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Barnard, D. M., Knowles, J. F., Barnard, H. R., Goulden, M. L., Hu, J., Litvak, M. E., & Molotch, N. P. (2018). Reevaluating growing season length controls on net ecosystem production in evergreen conifer forests. Scientific reports, 8(1), [17973]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36065-0

Reevaluating growing season length controls on net ecosystem production in evergreen conifer forests. / Barnard, David M.; Knowles, John F.; Barnard, Holly R.; Goulden, Michael L.; Hu, Jia; Litvak, Marcy E.; Molotch, Noah P.

In: Scientific reports, Vol. 8, No. 1, 17973, 01.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barnard, David M. ; Knowles, John F. ; Barnard, Holly R. ; Goulden, Michael L. ; Hu, Jia ; Litvak, Marcy E. ; Molotch, Noah P. / Reevaluating growing season length controls on net ecosystem production in evergreen conifer forests. In: Scientific reports. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 1.
@article{34d022dafda6464c9847c5cdbe906166,
title = "Reevaluating growing season length controls on net ecosystem production in evergreen conifer forests",
abstract = "Growing season length (GSL) is a key unifying concept in ecology that can be estimated from eddy covariance-derived estimates of net ecosystem production (NEP). Previous studies disagree on how increasing GSLs may affect NEP in evergreen coniferous forests, potentially due to the variety of methods used to quantify GSL from NEP. We calculated GSL and GSL-NEP regressions at eleven evergreen conifer sites across a broad climatic gradient in western North America using three common approaches: (1) variable length (3–7 days) regressions of day of year versus NEP, (2) a smoothed threshold approach, and (3) the carbon uptake period, followed by a new approach of a method-averaged ensemble. The GSL and the GSL-NEP relationship differed among methods, resulting in linear relationships with variable sign, slope, and statistical significance. For all combinations of sites and methods, the GSL explained between 6{\%} and 82{\%} of NEP with p-values ranging from 0.45 to < 0.01. These results demonstrate the variability among GSL methods and the importance of selecting an appropriate method to accurately project the ecosystem carbon cycling response to longer growing seasons in the future. To encourage this approach in future studies, we outline a series of best practices for GSL method selection depending on research goals and the annual NEP dynamics of the study site(s). These results contribute to understanding growing season dynamics at ecosystem and continental scales and underscore the potential for methodological variability to influence forecasts of the evergreen conifer forest response to climate variability.",
author = "Barnard, {David M.} and Knowles, {John F.} and Barnard, {Holly R.} and Goulden, {Michael L.} and Jia Hu and Litvak, {Marcy E.} and Molotch, {Noah P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-018-36065-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reevaluating growing season length controls on net ecosystem production in evergreen conifer forests

AU - Barnard, David M.

AU - Knowles, John F.

AU - Barnard, Holly R.

AU - Goulden, Michael L.

AU - Hu, Jia

AU - Litvak, Marcy E.

AU - Molotch, Noah P.

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Growing season length (GSL) is a key unifying concept in ecology that can be estimated from eddy covariance-derived estimates of net ecosystem production (NEP). Previous studies disagree on how increasing GSLs may affect NEP in evergreen coniferous forests, potentially due to the variety of methods used to quantify GSL from NEP. We calculated GSL and GSL-NEP regressions at eleven evergreen conifer sites across a broad climatic gradient in western North America using three common approaches: (1) variable length (3–7 days) regressions of day of year versus NEP, (2) a smoothed threshold approach, and (3) the carbon uptake period, followed by a new approach of a method-averaged ensemble. The GSL and the GSL-NEP relationship differed among methods, resulting in linear relationships with variable sign, slope, and statistical significance. For all combinations of sites and methods, the GSL explained between 6% and 82% of NEP with p-values ranging from 0.45 to < 0.01. These results demonstrate the variability among GSL methods and the importance of selecting an appropriate method to accurately project the ecosystem carbon cycling response to longer growing seasons in the future. To encourage this approach in future studies, we outline a series of best practices for GSL method selection depending on research goals and the annual NEP dynamics of the study site(s). These results contribute to understanding growing season dynamics at ecosystem and continental scales and underscore the potential for methodological variability to influence forecasts of the evergreen conifer forest response to climate variability.

AB - Growing season length (GSL) is a key unifying concept in ecology that can be estimated from eddy covariance-derived estimates of net ecosystem production (NEP). Previous studies disagree on how increasing GSLs may affect NEP in evergreen coniferous forests, potentially due to the variety of methods used to quantify GSL from NEP. We calculated GSL and GSL-NEP regressions at eleven evergreen conifer sites across a broad climatic gradient in western North America using three common approaches: (1) variable length (3–7 days) regressions of day of year versus NEP, (2) a smoothed threshold approach, and (3) the carbon uptake period, followed by a new approach of a method-averaged ensemble. The GSL and the GSL-NEP relationship differed among methods, resulting in linear relationships with variable sign, slope, and statistical significance. For all combinations of sites and methods, the GSL explained between 6% and 82% of NEP with p-values ranging from 0.45 to < 0.01. These results demonstrate the variability among GSL methods and the importance of selecting an appropriate method to accurately project the ecosystem carbon cycling response to longer growing seasons in the future. To encourage this approach in future studies, we outline a series of best practices for GSL method selection depending on research goals and the annual NEP dynamics of the study site(s). These results contribute to understanding growing season dynamics at ecosystem and continental scales and underscore the potential for methodological variability to influence forecasts of the evergreen conifer forest response to climate variability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058899844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058899844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-36065-0

DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-36065-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 30568298

AN - SCOPUS:85058899844

VL - 8

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 17973

ER -