Reflective intuition and the Copi card problem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the 1970’s, a controversy arose about a probability problem posed by Irving Copi. One side argued that a common spontaneous intuition about the problem is correct; the other side argued that this intuition is mistaken. Here, I argue (1) that the naïve intuition yields the correct answer, but accidentally and for a wrong reason; (2) that a more reflective intuition yields a wrong answer, and hence, is also mistaken; and (3) that an even more reflective intuition yields the correct answer for a correct reason. This warrants what I call optimistic fallibilism concerning intuitions about probability: although intuition is certainly prone to error in this domain, intuition has the capacity for self-correction. A naïve intuition that is mistaken can be replaced by a distinct, reflective intuition; and a reflective intuition that is mistaken can be replaced by another reflective intuition–with the process ultimately yielding a sound intuition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-344
Number of pages18
JournalPhilosophical Psychology
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Copi
  • Intuition
  • conditionalization
  • credence
  • probability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reflective intuition and the Copi card problem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this