Reforming infrastructure financing with 2020 vision

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) estimated America's infrastructure maintenance backlog at $1.6 trillion, which had risen to $2.2 trillion. The US will add 100 million people faster than any other country on the planet except India and Pakistan, and perhaps even China. The problem with our current system of financing new and maintaining existing infrastructure is that, for the most part, there is no dedicated, predictable funding source for either purpose. Likewise, public facilities and services could be moved from a general tax approach to assessment or fees. If this can be done, people would consume only that amount of infrastructure needed to meet their needs, and infrastructure provision would be efficient. If development pays its full cost, land use patterns will be efficient. Unfortunately, under the current taxing schemes in most American local governments, less costly development pays the same capital and maintenance costs as more costly development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-40
Number of pages12
JournalUrban Lawyer
Volume42-43
Issue number4-1
StatePublished - Sep 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

infrastructure
civil engineer
public facility
costs
cost
taxes
fee
Pakistan
local government
public service
planet
land use
funding
India
China
financing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Reforming infrastructure financing with 2020 vision. / Nelson, Arthur Christian.

In: Urban Lawyer, Vol. 42-43, No. 4-1, 09.2010, p. 29-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e78bfd7e98b45f1b1479d8604e42aef,
title = "Reforming infrastructure financing with 2020 vision",
abstract = "The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) estimated America's infrastructure maintenance backlog at $1.6 trillion, which had risen to $2.2 trillion. The US will add 100 million people faster than any other country on the planet except India and Pakistan, and perhaps even China. The problem with our current system of financing new and maintaining existing infrastructure is that, for the most part, there is no dedicated, predictable funding source for either purpose. Likewise, public facilities and services could be moved from a general tax approach to assessment or fees. If this can be done, people would consume only that amount of infrastructure needed to meet their needs, and infrastructure provision would be efficient. If development pays its full cost, land use patterns will be efficient. Unfortunately, under the current taxing schemes in most American local governments, less costly development pays the same capital and maintenance costs as more costly development.",
author = "Nelson, {Arthur Christian}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42-43",
pages = "29--40",
journal = "Urban Lawyer",
issn = "0042-0905",
publisher = "American Bar Association",
number = "4-1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reforming infrastructure financing with 2020 vision

AU - Nelson, Arthur Christian

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) estimated America's infrastructure maintenance backlog at $1.6 trillion, which had risen to $2.2 trillion. The US will add 100 million people faster than any other country on the planet except India and Pakistan, and perhaps even China. The problem with our current system of financing new and maintaining existing infrastructure is that, for the most part, there is no dedicated, predictable funding source for either purpose. Likewise, public facilities and services could be moved from a general tax approach to assessment or fees. If this can be done, people would consume only that amount of infrastructure needed to meet their needs, and infrastructure provision would be efficient. If development pays its full cost, land use patterns will be efficient. Unfortunately, under the current taxing schemes in most American local governments, less costly development pays the same capital and maintenance costs as more costly development.

AB - The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) estimated America's infrastructure maintenance backlog at $1.6 trillion, which had risen to $2.2 trillion. The US will add 100 million people faster than any other country on the planet except India and Pakistan, and perhaps even China. The problem with our current system of financing new and maintaining existing infrastructure is that, for the most part, there is no dedicated, predictable funding source for either purpose. Likewise, public facilities and services could be moved from a general tax approach to assessment or fees. If this can be done, people would consume only that amount of infrastructure needed to meet their needs, and infrastructure provision would be efficient. If development pays its full cost, land use patterns will be efficient. Unfortunately, under the current taxing schemes in most American local governments, less costly development pays the same capital and maintenance costs as more costly development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859814610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859814610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84859814610

VL - 42-43

SP - 29

EP - 40

JO - Urban Lawyer

JF - Urban Lawyer

SN - 0042-0905

IS - 4-1

ER -