Refractive indices of minerals and synthetic compounds

Ruth C. Shannon, Barbara Lafuente, Robert D. Shannon, Robert T Downs, Reinhard X. Fischer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This is a comprehensive compilation of refractive indices of 1933 minerals and 1019 synthetic compounds including exact chemical compositions and references taken from 30 compilations and many mineral and synthetic oxide descriptions. It represents a subset of about 4000 entries used by Shannon and Fischer (2016) to determine the polarizabilities of 270 cations and anions after removing 425 minerals and compounds containing the lone-pair ions (Tl+, Sn2+, Pb2+, As3+, Sb3+, Bi3+, S4+, Se4+, Te4+, Cl5+, Br5+, I5+) and uranyl ions, U6+. The table lists the empirical composition of the mineral or synthetic compound, the ideal composition of the mineral, the mineral name or synthetic compound, the Dana classes and subclasses extended to include beryllates, aluminates, gallates, germanates, niobates, tantalates, molybdates, tungstates, etc., descriptive notes, e.g., structure polytypes and other information that helps define a particular mineral sample, and the locality of a mineral when known. Finally, we list nx, ny, nz, <nDobs> (all determined at 589.3 nm), <nDcalc>, deviation of observed and calculated mean refractive indices, molar volume Vm, corresponding to the volume of one formula unit, anion molar volume Van, calculated from Vm divided by the number of anions (O2-, F-, Cl-, OH-) and H2O in the formula unit, the total polarizability <αAE>, and finally the reference to the refractive indices for all 2946 entries. The total polarizability of a mineral, <αAE>, is a useful property that reflects its composition, crystal structure, and chemistry and was calculated using the Anderson-Eggleton relationship αAE=(nD 2-1)Vm/4π+(4π/3-c)(nD 2-1) where c = 2.26 is the electron overlap factor. The empirical polarizabilities and therefore, the combination of refractive indices, compositions, and molar volumes of the minerals and synthetic oxides in the table were verified by a comparison of observed and calculated total polarizabilities, <αAE> derived from individual polarizabilities of cations and anions. The deviation between observed and calculated refractive indices is <2% in most instances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1906-1914
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Mineralogist
Volume102
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

refractive index
Minerals
Refractive index
minerals
refractivity
mineral
Anions
anion
Density (specific gravity)
anions
Chemical analysis
entry
lists
Oxides
Cations
cation
germanates
oxide
Ions
aluminates

Keywords

  • Anderson-Eggleton relationship
  • electronic polarizabilities
  • minerals
  • optical properties
  • Refractive index
  • refractive-index calculation
  • synthetic compounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

Shannon, R. C., Lafuente, B., Shannon, R. D., Downs, R. T., & Fischer, R. X. (2017). Refractive indices of minerals and synthetic compounds. American Mineralogist, 102(9), 1906-1914. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2017-6144

Refractive indices of minerals and synthetic compounds. / Shannon, Ruth C.; Lafuente, Barbara; Shannon, Robert D.; Downs, Robert T; Fischer, Reinhard X.

In: American Mineralogist, Vol. 102, No. 9, 01.09.2017, p. 1906-1914.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shannon, RC, Lafuente, B, Shannon, RD, Downs, RT & Fischer, RX 2017, 'Refractive indices of minerals and synthetic compounds', American Mineralogist, vol. 102, no. 9, pp. 1906-1914. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2017-6144
Shannon RC, Lafuente B, Shannon RD, Downs RT, Fischer RX. Refractive indices of minerals and synthetic compounds. American Mineralogist. 2017 Sep 1;102(9):1906-1914. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2017-6144
Shannon, Ruth C. ; Lafuente, Barbara ; Shannon, Robert D. ; Downs, Robert T ; Fischer, Reinhard X. / Refractive indices of minerals and synthetic compounds. In: American Mineralogist. 2017 ; Vol. 102, No. 9. pp. 1906-1914.
@article{1a151d1773874e5faaf75ebb5b573aa1,
title = "Refractive indices of minerals and synthetic compounds",
abstract = "This is a comprehensive compilation of refractive indices of 1933 minerals and 1019 synthetic compounds including exact chemical compositions and references taken from 30 compilations and many mineral and synthetic oxide descriptions. It represents a subset of about 4000 entries used by Shannon and Fischer (2016) to determine the polarizabilities of 270 cations and anions after removing 425 minerals and compounds containing the lone-pair ions (Tl+, Sn2+, Pb2+, As3+, Sb3+, Bi3+, S4+, Se4+, Te4+, Cl5+, Br5+, I5+) and uranyl ions, U6+. The table lists the empirical composition of the mineral or synthetic compound, the ideal composition of the mineral, the mineral name or synthetic compound, the Dana classes and subclasses extended to include beryllates, aluminates, gallates, germanates, niobates, tantalates, molybdates, tungstates, etc., descriptive notes, e.g., structure polytypes and other information that helps define a particular mineral sample, and the locality of a mineral when known. Finally, we list nx, ny, nz, Dobs> (all determined at 589.3 nm), Dcalc>, deviation of observed and calculated mean refractive indices, molar volume Vm, corresponding to the volume of one formula unit, anion molar volume Van, calculated from Vm divided by the number of anions (O2-, F-, Cl-, OH-) and H2O in the formula unit, the total polarizability <αAE>, and finally the reference to the refractive indices for all 2946 entries. The total polarizability of a mineral, <αAE>, is a useful property that reflects its composition, crystal structure, and chemistry and was calculated using the Anderson-Eggleton relationship αAE=(nD 2-1)Vm/4π+(4π/3-c)(nD 2-1) where c = 2.26 is the electron overlap factor. The empirical polarizabilities and therefore, the combination of refractive indices, compositions, and molar volumes of the minerals and synthetic oxides in the table were verified by a comparison of observed and calculated total polarizabilities, <αAE> derived from individual polarizabilities of cations and anions. The deviation between observed and calculated refractive indices is <2{\%} in most instances.",
keywords = "Anderson-Eggleton relationship, electronic polarizabilities, minerals, optical properties, Refractive index, refractive-index calculation, synthetic compounds",
author = "Shannon, {Ruth C.} and Barbara Lafuente and Shannon, {Robert D.} and Downs, {Robert T} and Fischer, {Reinhard X.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2138/am-2017-6144",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "1906--1914",
journal = "American Mineralogist",
issn = "0003-004X",
publisher = "Mineralogical Society of America",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refractive indices of minerals and synthetic compounds

AU - Shannon, Ruth C.

AU - Lafuente, Barbara

AU - Shannon, Robert D.

AU - Downs, Robert T

AU - Fischer, Reinhard X.

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - This is a comprehensive compilation of refractive indices of 1933 minerals and 1019 synthetic compounds including exact chemical compositions and references taken from 30 compilations and many mineral and synthetic oxide descriptions. It represents a subset of about 4000 entries used by Shannon and Fischer (2016) to determine the polarizabilities of 270 cations and anions after removing 425 minerals and compounds containing the lone-pair ions (Tl+, Sn2+, Pb2+, As3+, Sb3+, Bi3+, S4+, Se4+, Te4+, Cl5+, Br5+, I5+) and uranyl ions, U6+. The table lists the empirical composition of the mineral or synthetic compound, the ideal composition of the mineral, the mineral name or synthetic compound, the Dana classes and subclasses extended to include beryllates, aluminates, gallates, germanates, niobates, tantalates, molybdates, tungstates, etc., descriptive notes, e.g., structure polytypes and other information that helps define a particular mineral sample, and the locality of a mineral when known. Finally, we list nx, ny, nz, Dobs> (all determined at 589.3 nm), Dcalc>, deviation of observed and calculated mean refractive indices, molar volume Vm, corresponding to the volume of one formula unit, anion molar volume Van, calculated from Vm divided by the number of anions (O2-, F-, Cl-, OH-) and H2O in the formula unit, the total polarizability <αAE>, and finally the reference to the refractive indices for all 2946 entries. The total polarizability of a mineral, <αAE>, is a useful property that reflects its composition, crystal structure, and chemistry and was calculated using the Anderson-Eggleton relationship αAE=(nD 2-1)Vm/4π+(4π/3-c)(nD 2-1) where c = 2.26 is the electron overlap factor. The empirical polarizabilities and therefore, the combination of refractive indices, compositions, and molar volumes of the minerals and synthetic oxides in the table were verified by a comparison of observed and calculated total polarizabilities, <αAE> derived from individual polarizabilities of cations and anions. The deviation between observed and calculated refractive indices is <2% in most instances.

AB - This is a comprehensive compilation of refractive indices of 1933 minerals and 1019 synthetic compounds including exact chemical compositions and references taken from 30 compilations and many mineral and synthetic oxide descriptions. It represents a subset of about 4000 entries used by Shannon and Fischer (2016) to determine the polarizabilities of 270 cations and anions after removing 425 minerals and compounds containing the lone-pair ions (Tl+, Sn2+, Pb2+, As3+, Sb3+, Bi3+, S4+, Se4+, Te4+, Cl5+, Br5+, I5+) and uranyl ions, U6+. The table lists the empirical composition of the mineral or synthetic compound, the ideal composition of the mineral, the mineral name or synthetic compound, the Dana classes and subclasses extended to include beryllates, aluminates, gallates, germanates, niobates, tantalates, molybdates, tungstates, etc., descriptive notes, e.g., structure polytypes and other information that helps define a particular mineral sample, and the locality of a mineral when known. Finally, we list nx, ny, nz, Dobs> (all determined at 589.3 nm), Dcalc>, deviation of observed and calculated mean refractive indices, molar volume Vm, corresponding to the volume of one formula unit, anion molar volume Van, calculated from Vm divided by the number of anions (O2-, F-, Cl-, OH-) and H2O in the formula unit, the total polarizability <αAE>, and finally the reference to the refractive indices for all 2946 entries. The total polarizability of a mineral, <αAE>, is a useful property that reflects its composition, crystal structure, and chemistry and was calculated using the Anderson-Eggleton relationship αAE=(nD 2-1)Vm/4π+(4π/3-c)(nD 2-1) where c = 2.26 is the electron overlap factor. The empirical polarizabilities and therefore, the combination of refractive indices, compositions, and molar volumes of the minerals and synthetic oxides in the table were verified by a comparison of observed and calculated total polarizabilities, <αAE> derived from individual polarizabilities of cations and anions. The deviation between observed and calculated refractive indices is <2% in most instances.

KW - Anderson-Eggleton relationship

KW - electronic polarizabilities

KW - minerals

KW - optical properties

KW - Refractive index

KW - refractive-index calculation

KW - synthetic compounds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029394324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029394324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2138/am-2017-6144

DO - 10.2138/am-2017-6144

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029394324

VL - 102

SP - 1906

EP - 1914

JO - American Mineralogist

JF - American Mineralogist

SN - 0003-004X

IS - 9

ER -