Regional analysis of sinonasal ciliary beat frequency

Jeffrey Shaari, James N. Palmer, Alexander G Chiu, Kevin D. Judy, Akiva S. Cohen, David W. Kennedy, Noam A. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Mucociliary clearance, a primary host defense mechanism, depends on mucus production and its clearance by the coordinated beating of cilia lining the airways. Numerous investigations have analyzed ciliary activity in brushings from the inferior turbinate. To date, only one study has investigated whether there exists variation in ciliary beat frequency (CBF) within the sinonasal cavity. We analyzed CBF from the inferior turbinate, uncinate process, and sphenoethmoid recess in nonsinusitis patients to determine regional variability of ciliary activity within the sinonasal cavity. Methods: Explants of sinonasal epithelium were analyzed at 37°C. Beating cilia were visualized with differential interference contrast microscopy. Images were captured using a high-speed digital camera with a sampling rate of 250 frames per second. A one-dimensional tracking algorithm analyzed individual pixel grayscale values within each frame of the video. The differences in grayscale were plotted as a time-dependent waveform, and frequency was calculated as the inverse of the peak-to-peak distance. A minimum of three areas of beating cilia were analyzed per regional sample. Statistical analysis was performed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: Complete sampling of all three sites was accomplished in 10 patients. No difference in CBF within the sinonasal cavity was identified (p < 0.05). The mean CBF for all sites in all patients was 12.6 ± 2.9 Hz, in agreement with published values. Conclusion: This study shows no regional differences in CBF within the sinonasal cavity, supporting previous work and validating analysis of inferior turbinate cilia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)150-154
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Rhinology
Volume20
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cilia
Turbinates
Interference Microscopy
Mucociliary Clearance
Mucus
Analysis of Variance
Epithelium

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Shaari, J., Palmer, J. N., Chiu, A. G., Judy, K. D., Cohen, A. S., Kennedy, D. W., & Cohen, N. A. (2006). Regional analysis of sinonasal ciliary beat frequency. American Journal of Rhinology, 20(2), 150-154.

Regional analysis of sinonasal ciliary beat frequency. / Shaari, Jeffrey; Palmer, James N.; Chiu, Alexander G; Judy, Kevin D.; Cohen, Akiva S.; Kennedy, David W.; Cohen, Noam A.

In: American Journal of Rhinology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 03.2006, p. 150-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shaari, J, Palmer, JN, Chiu, AG, Judy, KD, Cohen, AS, Kennedy, DW & Cohen, NA 2006, 'Regional analysis of sinonasal ciliary beat frequency', American Journal of Rhinology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 150-154.
Shaari J, Palmer JN, Chiu AG, Judy KD, Cohen AS, Kennedy DW et al. Regional analysis of sinonasal ciliary beat frequency. American Journal of Rhinology. 2006 Mar;20(2):150-154.
Shaari, Jeffrey ; Palmer, James N. ; Chiu, Alexander G ; Judy, Kevin D. ; Cohen, Akiva S. ; Kennedy, David W. ; Cohen, Noam A. / Regional analysis of sinonasal ciliary beat frequency. In: American Journal of Rhinology. 2006 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 150-154.
@article{d9331cfd9d5d4686af19c1a8feaf4ace,
title = "Regional analysis of sinonasal ciliary beat frequency",
abstract = "Background: Mucociliary clearance, a primary host defense mechanism, depends on mucus production and its clearance by the coordinated beating of cilia lining the airways. Numerous investigations have analyzed ciliary activity in brushings from the inferior turbinate. To date, only one study has investigated whether there exists variation in ciliary beat frequency (CBF) within the sinonasal cavity. We analyzed CBF from the inferior turbinate, uncinate process, and sphenoethmoid recess in nonsinusitis patients to determine regional variability of ciliary activity within the sinonasal cavity. Methods: Explants of sinonasal epithelium were analyzed at 37°C. Beating cilia were visualized with differential interference contrast microscopy. Images were captured using a high-speed digital camera with a sampling rate of 250 frames per second. A one-dimensional tracking algorithm analyzed individual pixel grayscale values within each frame of the video. The differences in grayscale were plotted as a time-dependent waveform, and frequency was calculated as the inverse of the peak-to-peak distance. A minimum of three areas of beating cilia were analyzed per regional sample. Statistical analysis was performed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: Complete sampling of all three sites was accomplished in 10 patients. No difference in CBF within the sinonasal cavity was identified (p < 0.05). The mean CBF for all sites in all patients was 12.6 ± 2.9 Hz, in agreement with published values. Conclusion: This study shows no regional differences in CBF within the sinonasal cavity, supporting previous work and validating analysis of inferior turbinate cilia.",
author = "Jeffrey Shaari and Palmer, {James N.} and Chiu, {Alexander G} and Judy, {Kevin D.} and Cohen, {Akiva S.} and Kennedy, {David W.} and Cohen, {Noam A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "150--154",
journal = "American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy",
issn = "1945-8924",
publisher = "OceanSide Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regional analysis of sinonasal ciliary beat frequency

AU - Shaari, Jeffrey

AU - Palmer, James N.

AU - Chiu, Alexander G

AU - Judy, Kevin D.

AU - Cohen, Akiva S.

AU - Kennedy, David W.

AU - Cohen, Noam A.

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Background: Mucociliary clearance, a primary host defense mechanism, depends on mucus production and its clearance by the coordinated beating of cilia lining the airways. Numerous investigations have analyzed ciliary activity in brushings from the inferior turbinate. To date, only one study has investigated whether there exists variation in ciliary beat frequency (CBF) within the sinonasal cavity. We analyzed CBF from the inferior turbinate, uncinate process, and sphenoethmoid recess in nonsinusitis patients to determine regional variability of ciliary activity within the sinonasal cavity. Methods: Explants of sinonasal epithelium were analyzed at 37°C. Beating cilia were visualized with differential interference contrast microscopy. Images were captured using a high-speed digital camera with a sampling rate of 250 frames per second. A one-dimensional tracking algorithm analyzed individual pixel grayscale values within each frame of the video. The differences in grayscale were plotted as a time-dependent waveform, and frequency was calculated as the inverse of the peak-to-peak distance. A minimum of three areas of beating cilia were analyzed per regional sample. Statistical analysis was performed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: Complete sampling of all three sites was accomplished in 10 patients. No difference in CBF within the sinonasal cavity was identified (p < 0.05). The mean CBF for all sites in all patients was 12.6 ± 2.9 Hz, in agreement with published values. Conclusion: This study shows no regional differences in CBF within the sinonasal cavity, supporting previous work and validating analysis of inferior turbinate cilia.

AB - Background: Mucociliary clearance, a primary host defense mechanism, depends on mucus production and its clearance by the coordinated beating of cilia lining the airways. Numerous investigations have analyzed ciliary activity in brushings from the inferior turbinate. To date, only one study has investigated whether there exists variation in ciliary beat frequency (CBF) within the sinonasal cavity. We analyzed CBF from the inferior turbinate, uncinate process, and sphenoethmoid recess in nonsinusitis patients to determine regional variability of ciliary activity within the sinonasal cavity. Methods: Explants of sinonasal epithelium were analyzed at 37°C. Beating cilia were visualized with differential interference contrast microscopy. Images were captured using a high-speed digital camera with a sampling rate of 250 frames per second. A one-dimensional tracking algorithm analyzed individual pixel grayscale values within each frame of the video. The differences in grayscale were plotted as a time-dependent waveform, and frequency was calculated as the inverse of the peak-to-peak distance. A minimum of three areas of beating cilia were analyzed per regional sample. Statistical analysis was performed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: Complete sampling of all three sites was accomplished in 10 patients. No difference in CBF within the sinonasal cavity was identified (p < 0.05). The mean CBF for all sites in all patients was 12.6 ± 2.9 Hz, in agreement with published values. Conclusion: This study shows no regional differences in CBF within the sinonasal cavity, supporting previous work and validating analysis of inferior turbinate cilia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646228394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646228394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16686377

AN - SCOPUS:33646228394

VL - 20

SP - 150

EP - 154

JO - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

JF - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

SN - 1945-8924

IS - 2

ER -