Regret in decision making

Terence Connolly, Marcel Zeelenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

289 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decision research has only recently started to take seriously the role of emotions in choices and decisions. Regret is the emotion that has received the most attention. In this article, we sample a number of the initial regret studies from psychology and economics, and trace some of the complexities and contradictions to which they led. We then sketch a new theory, decision justification theory (DJT), which synthesizes several apparently conflicting findings. DJT postulates two core components of decision-related regret, one associated with the (comparative) evaluation of the outcome, the other with the feeling of self-blame for having made a poor choice. We reinterpret several existing studies in DJT terms. We then report some new studies that directly tested (and support) DJT, and propose a number of research issues that follow from this new approach to regret.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)212-215
Number of pages4
JournalCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
Volume11
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2002

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Emotions
Decision Theory
Research
Economics
Psychology

Keywords

  • Decision justification theory
  • Decision making
  • Emotion
  • Regret

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Regret in decision making. / Connolly, Terence; Zeelenberg, Marcel.

In: Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 11, No. 6, 12.2002, p. 212-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Connolly, T & Zeelenberg, M 2002, 'Regret in decision making', Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 212-215.
Connolly, Terence ; Zeelenberg, Marcel. / Regret in decision making. In: Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2002 ; Vol. 11, No. 6. pp. 212-215.
@article{320ed2cc716847bc81005350d0efeabf,
title = "Regret in decision making",
abstract = "Decision research has only recently started to take seriously the role of emotions in choices and decisions. Regret is the emotion that has received the most attention. In this article, we sample a number of the initial regret studies from psychology and economics, and trace some of the complexities and contradictions to which they led. We then sketch a new theory, decision justification theory (DJT), which synthesizes several apparently conflicting findings. DJT postulates two core components of decision-related regret, one associated with the (comparative) evaluation of the outcome, the other with the feeling of self-blame for having made a poor choice. We reinterpret several existing studies in DJT terms. We then report some new studies that directly tested (and support) DJT, and propose a number of research issues that follow from this new approach to regret.",
keywords = "Decision justification theory, Decision making, Emotion, Regret",
author = "Terence Connolly and Marcel Zeelenberg",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "212--215",
journal = "Current Directions in Psychological Science",
issn = "0963-7214",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regret in decision making

AU - Connolly, Terence

AU - Zeelenberg, Marcel

PY - 2002/12

Y1 - 2002/12

N2 - Decision research has only recently started to take seriously the role of emotions in choices and decisions. Regret is the emotion that has received the most attention. In this article, we sample a number of the initial regret studies from psychology and economics, and trace some of the complexities and contradictions to which they led. We then sketch a new theory, decision justification theory (DJT), which synthesizes several apparently conflicting findings. DJT postulates two core components of decision-related regret, one associated with the (comparative) evaluation of the outcome, the other with the feeling of self-blame for having made a poor choice. We reinterpret several existing studies in DJT terms. We then report some new studies that directly tested (and support) DJT, and propose a number of research issues that follow from this new approach to regret.

AB - Decision research has only recently started to take seriously the role of emotions in choices and decisions. Regret is the emotion that has received the most attention. In this article, we sample a number of the initial regret studies from psychology and economics, and trace some of the complexities and contradictions to which they led. We then sketch a new theory, decision justification theory (DJT), which synthesizes several apparently conflicting findings. DJT postulates two core components of decision-related regret, one associated with the (comparative) evaluation of the outcome, the other with the feeling of self-blame for having made a poor choice. We reinterpret several existing studies in DJT terms. We then report some new studies that directly tested (and support) DJT, and propose a number of research issues that follow from this new approach to regret.

KW - Decision justification theory

KW - Decision making

KW - Emotion

KW - Regret

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036929380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036929380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036929380

VL - 11

SP - 212

EP - 215

JO - Current Directions in Psychological Science

JF - Current Directions in Psychological Science

SN - 0963-7214

IS - 6

ER -