Regret in economic and psychological theories of choice

Terence Connolly, David Butler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that choice can be influenced by expectations of regret or disappointment (or, for positive outcomes, of rejoicing or elation). Psychological researchers measure these expectations with self-report instruments, economists infer them from observed choice behavior. The present study examines whether the emotion postulates embodied in economic choice models correspond to expected and experienced emotions as measured by self-report. In a laboratory study (n=50) of student participants playing real-money lotteries, we included questionnaire measures of expected emotions for each possible lottery outcome. These emotion measures are reliable and well behaved, and modestly predictive of actual choices. They did not, however, conform well to the specific postulates of economic choice models, though they did show some of the juxtaposition effects proposed in such models. Emotional reactions to decision outcomes may be better characterized by broad measures of positive and negative affect than as nuanced mixtures of distinct emotions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-154
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Behavioral Decision Making
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Psychological Theory
psychological theory
economic theory
Emotions
emotion
Economics
Economic Models
Self Report
Choice Behavior
economist
economics
money
Emotion
Psychological
Economic Theory
Research Personnel
questionnaire
Students
Psychology
student

Keywords

  • Choice
  • Decision-making
  • Disappointment
  • Emotions
  • Preferences
  • Regret

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Regret in economic and psychological theories of choice. / Connolly, Terence; Butler, David.

In: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 19, No. 2, 04.2006, p. 139-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{beccae376fa2440eb1a474a31ce12762,
title = "Regret in economic and psychological theories of choice",
abstract = "Numerous studies have shown that choice can be influenced by expectations of regret or disappointment (or, for positive outcomes, of rejoicing or elation). Psychological researchers measure these expectations with self-report instruments, economists infer them from observed choice behavior. The present study examines whether the emotion postulates embodied in economic choice models correspond to expected and experienced emotions as measured by self-report. In a laboratory study (n=50) of student participants playing real-money lotteries, we included questionnaire measures of expected emotions for each possible lottery outcome. These emotion measures are reliable and well behaved, and modestly predictive of actual choices. They did not, however, conform well to the specific postulates of economic choice models, though they did show some of the juxtaposition effects proposed in such models. Emotional reactions to decision outcomes may be better characterized by broad measures of positive and negative affect than as nuanced mixtures of distinct emotions.",
keywords = "Choice, Decision-making, Disappointment, Emotions, Preferences, Regret",
author = "Terence Connolly and David Butler",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1002/bdm.510",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "139--154",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Decision Making",
issn = "0894-3257",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regret in economic and psychological theories of choice

AU - Connolly, Terence

AU - Butler, David

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Numerous studies have shown that choice can be influenced by expectations of regret or disappointment (or, for positive outcomes, of rejoicing or elation). Psychological researchers measure these expectations with self-report instruments, economists infer them from observed choice behavior. The present study examines whether the emotion postulates embodied in economic choice models correspond to expected and experienced emotions as measured by self-report. In a laboratory study (n=50) of student participants playing real-money lotteries, we included questionnaire measures of expected emotions for each possible lottery outcome. These emotion measures are reliable and well behaved, and modestly predictive of actual choices. They did not, however, conform well to the specific postulates of economic choice models, though they did show some of the juxtaposition effects proposed in such models. Emotional reactions to decision outcomes may be better characterized by broad measures of positive and negative affect than as nuanced mixtures of distinct emotions.

AB - Numerous studies have shown that choice can be influenced by expectations of regret or disappointment (or, for positive outcomes, of rejoicing or elation). Psychological researchers measure these expectations with self-report instruments, economists infer them from observed choice behavior. The present study examines whether the emotion postulates embodied in economic choice models correspond to expected and experienced emotions as measured by self-report. In a laboratory study (n=50) of student participants playing real-money lotteries, we included questionnaire measures of expected emotions for each possible lottery outcome. These emotion measures are reliable and well behaved, and modestly predictive of actual choices. They did not, however, conform well to the specific postulates of economic choice models, though they did show some of the juxtaposition effects proposed in such models. Emotional reactions to decision outcomes may be better characterized by broad measures of positive and negative affect than as nuanced mixtures of distinct emotions.

KW - Choice

KW - Decision-making

KW - Disappointment

KW - Emotions

KW - Preferences

KW - Regret

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36248933522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36248933522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bdm.510

DO - 10.1002/bdm.510

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 139

EP - 154

JO - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

JF - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

SN - 0894-3257

IS - 2

ER -