Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect

Terence Connolly, Jochen Reb, Edgar E. Kausel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task. It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one's own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-149
Number of pages14
JournalJudgment and Decision Making
Volume8
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Social Responsibility
Emotions
Accountability
Justification
Experiment

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Anticipated regret
  • Decision making
  • Decoy effect
  • Justifiability
  • Regret priming
  • Regret salience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect. / Connolly, Terence; Reb, Jochen; Kausel, Edgar E.

In: Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 2, 03.2013, p. 136-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Connolly, Terence ; Reb, Jochen ; Kausel, Edgar E. / Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect. In: Judgment and Decision Making. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 136-149.
@article{628aa9a595b9464f80eba6c22260c6ea,
title = "Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect",
abstract = "Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task. It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one's own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it.",
keywords = "Accountability, Anticipated regret, Decision making, Decoy effect, Justifiability, Regret priming, Regret salience",
author = "Terence Connolly and Jochen Reb and Kausel, {Edgar E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "136--149",
journal = "Judgment and Decision Making",
issn = "1930-2975",
publisher = "Society for Judgment and Decision Making",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect

AU - Connolly, Terence

AU - Reb, Jochen

AU - Kausel, Edgar E.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task. It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one's own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it.

AB - Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task. It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one's own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it.

KW - Accountability

KW - Anticipated regret

KW - Decision making

KW - Decoy effect

KW - Justifiability

KW - Regret priming

KW - Regret salience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875712025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875712025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875712025

VL - 8

SP - 136

EP - 149

JO - Judgment and Decision Making

JF - Judgment and Decision Making

SN - 1930-2975

IS - 2

ER -