Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to a social meaning model of nonverbal communication, many nonverbal behaviors have consensually recognized meanings. Two field experiments examined this presumption by investigating the relational message interpretations assigned to differing levels and types of touch, proximity, and posture. Also examined were the possible moderating effects of the communicator characteristics of gender and attractiveness and relationship characteristics of gender composition and status differentials. Results showed that touching typically conveyed more composure, immediacy, receptivity/trust, affection, similarity/depth/equality, dominance, and informality than its absence. The form of touch also mattered, with handholding and face touching expressing the most intimacy, composure, and informality; handholding and the handshake expressing the least dominance, and the handshake conveying the most formality but also receptivity/trust. Postural openness/relaxation paralleled touch in conveying greater intimacy, composure, informality, and similarity but was also less dominant than a closed/tense posture. Close proximity was also more immediate and similar but dominant. Proximity and postural openness together produced differential interpretations of composure, similarity, and affection. Gender initiator attractiveness was more influential than status in moderating interpretations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-259
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Nonverbal Behavior
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1991

Fingerprint

Touch
Posture
Nonverbal Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture. / Burgoon, Judee K.

In: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, Vol. 15, No. 4, 12.1991, p. 233-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{02acb1172171410eb18bac134c773818,
title = "Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture",
abstract = "According to a social meaning model of nonverbal communication, many nonverbal behaviors have consensually recognized meanings. Two field experiments examined this presumption by investigating the relational message interpretations assigned to differing levels and types of touch, proximity, and posture. Also examined were the possible moderating effects of the communicator characteristics of gender and attractiveness and relationship characteristics of gender composition and status differentials. Results showed that touching typically conveyed more composure, immediacy, receptivity/trust, affection, similarity/depth/equality, dominance, and informality than its absence. The form of touch also mattered, with handholding and face touching expressing the most intimacy, composure, and informality; handholding and the handshake expressing the least dominance, and the handshake conveying the most formality but also receptivity/trust. Postural openness/relaxation paralleled touch in conveying greater intimacy, composure, informality, and similarity but was also less dominant than a closed/tense posture. Close proximity was also more immediate and similar but dominant. Proximity and postural openness together produced differential interpretations of composure, similarity, and affection. Gender initiator attractiveness was more influential than status in moderating interpretations.",
author = "Burgoon, {Judee K}",
year = "1991",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/BF00986924",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "233--259",
journal = "Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior",
issn = "0361-3496",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic/Human Sciences Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture

AU - Burgoon, Judee K

PY - 1991/12

Y1 - 1991/12

N2 - According to a social meaning model of nonverbal communication, many nonverbal behaviors have consensually recognized meanings. Two field experiments examined this presumption by investigating the relational message interpretations assigned to differing levels and types of touch, proximity, and posture. Also examined were the possible moderating effects of the communicator characteristics of gender and attractiveness and relationship characteristics of gender composition and status differentials. Results showed that touching typically conveyed more composure, immediacy, receptivity/trust, affection, similarity/depth/equality, dominance, and informality than its absence. The form of touch also mattered, with handholding and face touching expressing the most intimacy, composure, and informality; handholding and the handshake expressing the least dominance, and the handshake conveying the most formality but also receptivity/trust. Postural openness/relaxation paralleled touch in conveying greater intimacy, composure, informality, and similarity but was also less dominant than a closed/tense posture. Close proximity was also more immediate and similar but dominant. Proximity and postural openness together produced differential interpretations of composure, similarity, and affection. Gender initiator attractiveness was more influential than status in moderating interpretations.

AB - According to a social meaning model of nonverbal communication, many nonverbal behaviors have consensually recognized meanings. Two field experiments examined this presumption by investigating the relational message interpretations assigned to differing levels and types of touch, proximity, and posture. Also examined were the possible moderating effects of the communicator characteristics of gender and attractiveness and relationship characteristics of gender composition and status differentials. Results showed that touching typically conveyed more composure, immediacy, receptivity/trust, affection, similarity/depth/equality, dominance, and informality than its absence. The form of touch also mattered, with handholding and face touching expressing the most intimacy, composure, and informality; handholding and the handshake expressing the least dominance, and the handshake conveying the most formality but also receptivity/trust. Postural openness/relaxation paralleled touch in conveying greater intimacy, composure, informality, and similarity but was also less dominant than a closed/tense posture. Close proximity was also more immediate and similar but dominant. Proximity and postural openness together produced differential interpretations of composure, similarity, and affection. Gender initiator attractiveness was more influential than status in moderating interpretations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001421529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001421529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00986924

DO - 10.1007/BF00986924

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 233

EP - 259

JO - Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior

JF - Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior

SN - 0361-3496

IS - 4

ER -