Relationship of morphological variables to rubber production in guayule

D. A. Dierig, A. E. Thompson, D. T. Ray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to find measurable characters to aid the plant breeder in predicting both rubber percentage and rubber yield of guayule (Parthenium argentatum Gray). A field of 234 guayule breeding lines was harvested by clipping in February 1986. Forty-two of these lines were selected for further evaluation on the basis of superior regrowth, rubber content and yield. These 42 lines were reharvested in February 1987. Nineteen variables were evaluated including percent rubber and resin, rubber and resin yield (g/plant), plant height (cm), width (cm), and volume (m3), fresh and dry weight (kg/plant), percent dry weight, stem number, mean stem diameter (cm), total and mean stem circumference (cm), total and mean stem area (cm2), total stem circumference/total stem area (cm-1), and regeneration at two dates. Dry weight (kg/plant) had the best correlation to rubber yield (r=0.85), and plant volume best predicted dry weight (r=0.83). These variables did not correlate as highly with percent rubber. The best statistical regression model for percent rubber included four variables, fresh and dry weight, percent dry weight, and plant volume. This model accounted for 51% of the variation. In comparison, the best regression of rubber yield had an R2=0.85 for plant height and width, volume, and dry weight.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-264
Number of pages6
JournalEuphytica
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1989

Keywords

  • Parthenium argentatum
  • correlations
  • germplasm
  • guayule
  • regressions
  • rubber production

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Genetics
  • Plant Science
  • Horticulture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relationship of morphological variables to rubber production in guayule'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this