Relationships between direct predation and risk effects

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

476 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Risk effects arise when prey alter their behavior in response to predators, and these responses carry costs. Empirical studies have found that risk effects can be large. Nonetheless, studies of predation in vertebrate conservation and management usually consider only direct predation. Given the ubiquity and strength of behavioral responses to predators by vertebrate prey, it is not safe to assume that risk effects on dynamics can be ignored. Risk effects can be larger than direct effects. Risk effects can exist even when the direct rate of predation is zero. Risk effects and direct effects do not necessarily change in parallel. When risk effects reduce reproduction rather than survival, they are easily mistaken for limitation by food supply.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)194-201
Number of pages8
JournalTrends in Ecology and Evolution
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

predation
vertebrates
predators
vertebrate
predator
effect
behavioral response
food supply
cost

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. / Creel, Scott; Christianson, David A.

In: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 23, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 194-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c7895da46fc040179d53c77da95401a7,
title = "Relationships between direct predation and risk effects",
abstract = "Risk effects arise when prey alter their behavior in response to predators, and these responses carry costs. Empirical studies have found that risk effects can be large. Nonetheless, studies of predation in vertebrate conservation and management usually consider only direct predation. Given the ubiquity and strength of behavioral responses to predators by vertebrate prey, it is not safe to assume that risk effects on dynamics can be ignored. Risk effects can be larger than direct effects. Risk effects can exist even when the direct rate of predation is zero. Risk effects and direct effects do not necessarily change in parallel. When risk effects reduce reproduction rather than survival, they are easily mistaken for limitation by food supply.",
author = "Scott Creel and Christianson, {David A}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "194--201",
journal = "Trends in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "0169-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationships between direct predation and risk effects

AU - Creel, Scott

AU - Christianson, David A

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Risk effects arise when prey alter their behavior in response to predators, and these responses carry costs. Empirical studies have found that risk effects can be large. Nonetheless, studies of predation in vertebrate conservation and management usually consider only direct predation. Given the ubiquity and strength of behavioral responses to predators by vertebrate prey, it is not safe to assume that risk effects on dynamics can be ignored. Risk effects can be larger than direct effects. Risk effects can exist even when the direct rate of predation is zero. Risk effects and direct effects do not necessarily change in parallel. When risk effects reduce reproduction rather than survival, they are easily mistaken for limitation by food supply.

AB - Risk effects arise when prey alter their behavior in response to predators, and these responses carry costs. Empirical studies have found that risk effects can be large. Nonetheless, studies of predation in vertebrate conservation and management usually consider only direct predation. Given the ubiquity and strength of behavioral responses to predators by vertebrate prey, it is not safe to assume that risk effects on dynamics can be ignored. Risk effects can be larger than direct effects. Risk effects can exist even when the direct rate of predation is zero. Risk effects and direct effects do not necessarily change in parallel. When risk effects reduce reproduction rather than survival, they are easily mistaken for limitation by food supply.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40849137417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40849137417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 18308423

AN - SCOPUS:40849137417

VL - 23

SP - 194

EP - 201

JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

IS - 4

ER -