Relative effect sizes for measures of risk

Jake Olivier, Warren L. May, Melanie L Bell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Effect sizes are an important component of experimental design, data analysis, and interpretation of statistical results. In some situations, an effect size of clinical or practical importance may be unknown to the researcher. In other situations, the researcher may be interested in comparing observed effect sizes to known standards to quantify clinical importance. In these cases, the notion of relative effect sizes (small, medium, large) can be useful as benchmarks. Although there is generally an extensive literature on relative effect sizes for continuous data, little of this research has focused on relative effect sizes for measures of risk that are common in epidemiological or biomedical studies. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to extend existing relative effect sizes to the relative risk, odds ratio, hazard ratio, rate ratio, and Mantel–Haenszel odds ratio for related samples. In most scenarios with equal group allocation, effect sizes of 1.22, 1.86, and 3.00 can be taken as small, medium, and large, respectively. The odds ratio for a non rare event is a notable exception and modified relative effect sizes are 1.32, 2.38, and 4.70 in that situation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Mar 23 2017

Fingerprint

Effect Size
Odds Ratio
Rare Events
Relative Risk
Experimental design
Hazard
Exception
Data analysis
Quantify
Benchmark
Unknown
Scenarios

Keywords

  • Effect size
  • epidemiology
  • odds ratio
  • relative risk
  • risk measures.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

Relative effect sizes for measures of risk. / Olivier, Jake; May, Warren L.; Bell, Melanie L.

In: Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 23.03.2017, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{709e2090f6f643ac9bd81ce7248f8ab0,
title = "Relative effect sizes for measures of risk",
abstract = "Effect sizes are an important component of experimental design, data analysis, and interpretation of statistical results. In some situations, an effect size of clinical or practical importance may be unknown to the researcher. In other situations, the researcher may be interested in comparing observed effect sizes to known standards to quantify clinical importance. In these cases, the notion of relative effect sizes (small, medium, large) can be useful as benchmarks. Although there is generally an extensive literature on relative effect sizes for continuous data, little of this research has focused on relative effect sizes for measures of risk that are common in epidemiological or biomedical studies. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to extend existing relative effect sizes to the relative risk, odds ratio, hazard ratio, rate ratio, and Mantel–Haenszel odds ratio for related samples. In most scenarios with equal group allocation, effect sizes of 1.22, 1.86, and 3.00 can be taken as small, medium, and large, respectively. The odds ratio for a non rare event is a notable exception and modified relative effect sizes are 1.32, 2.38, and 4.70 in that situation.",
keywords = "Effect size, epidemiology, odds ratio, relative risk, risk measures.",
author = "Jake Olivier and May, {Warren L.} and Bell, {Melanie L}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/03610926.2015.1134575",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods",
issn = "0361-0926",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relative effect sizes for measures of risk

AU - Olivier, Jake

AU - May, Warren L.

AU - Bell, Melanie L

PY - 2017/3/23

Y1 - 2017/3/23

N2 - Effect sizes are an important component of experimental design, data analysis, and interpretation of statistical results. In some situations, an effect size of clinical or practical importance may be unknown to the researcher. In other situations, the researcher may be interested in comparing observed effect sizes to known standards to quantify clinical importance. In these cases, the notion of relative effect sizes (small, medium, large) can be useful as benchmarks. Although there is generally an extensive literature on relative effect sizes for continuous data, little of this research has focused on relative effect sizes for measures of risk that are common in epidemiological or biomedical studies. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to extend existing relative effect sizes to the relative risk, odds ratio, hazard ratio, rate ratio, and Mantel–Haenszel odds ratio for related samples. In most scenarios with equal group allocation, effect sizes of 1.22, 1.86, and 3.00 can be taken as small, medium, and large, respectively. The odds ratio for a non rare event is a notable exception and modified relative effect sizes are 1.32, 2.38, and 4.70 in that situation.

AB - Effect sizes are an important component of experimental design, data analysis, and interpretation of statistical results. In some situations, an effect size of clinical or practical importance may be unknown to the researcher. In other situations, the researcher may be interested in comparing observed effect sizes to known standards to quantify clinical importance. In these cases, the notion of relative effect sizes (small, medium, large) can be useful as benchmarks. Although there is generally an extensive literature on relative effect sizes for continuous data, little of this research has focused on relative effect sizes for measures of risk that are common in epidemiological or biomedical studies. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to extend existing relative effect sizes to the relative risk, odds ratio, hazard ratio, rate ratio, and Mantel–Haenszel odds ratio for related samples. In most scenarios with equal group allocation, effect sizes of 1.22, 1.86, and 3.00 can be taken as small, medium, and large, respectively. The odds ratio for a non rare event is a notable exception and modified relative effect sizes are 1.32, 2.38, and 4.70 in that situation.

KW - Effect size

KW - epidemiology

KW - odds ratio

KW - relative risk

KW - risk measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015870539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015870539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03610926.2015.1134575

DO - 10.1080/03610926.2015.1134575

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85015870539

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods

JF - Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods

SN - 0361-0926

ER -