Reliability of magnetic inclination angle determinations for pulsars

M. Coleman Miller, Russell J Hamilton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compare the recent estimates of the inclination angle α between the rotation and magnetic axes of 56 pulsars made by both Lyne & Manchester and Rankin. Their results agree reasonably well when α is ≲40°; however, there is no correlation between the two estimates of α if either estimate exceeds 40°. The correlation is better for pulsars with beams having more complicated core structure. Nevertheless, the differences between the two sets of estimates are large enough that use of these estimates to investigate pulsar physics is questionable. We discuss the method for determining α based on the Radhakrishnan & Cooke single-vector model, emphasizing its sensitivity to measurement errors. This method complements the approaches of Rankin and Lyne & Manchester and is preferable when accurate polarization data are available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)298-301
Number of pages4
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume411
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

magnetic inclination
pulsars
inclination
estimates
physics
polarization
complement
method
sensitivity

Keywords

  • Pulsars: general
  • Stars: neutron

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Reliability of magnetic inclination angle determinations for pulsars. / Coleman Miller, M.; Hamilton, Russell J.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 411, No. 1, 01.07.1993, p. 298-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc4aaebc8c1149138711aa0fd47608db,
title = "Reliability of magnetic inclination angle determinations for pulsars",
abstract = "We compare the recent estimates of the inclination angle α between the rotation and magnetic axes of 56 pulsars made by both Lyne & Manchester and Rankin. Their results agree reasonably well when α is ≲40°; however, there is no correlation between the two estimates of α if either estimate exceeds 40°. The correlation is better for pulsars with beams having more complicated core structure. Nevertheless, the differences between the two sets of estimates are large enough that use of these estimates to investigate pulsar physics is questionable. We discuss the method for determining α based on the Radhakrishnan & Cooke single-vector model, emphasizing its sensitivity to measurement errors. This method complements the approaches of Rankin and Lyne & Manchester and is preferable when accurate polarization data are available.",
keywords = "Pulsars: general, Stars: neutron",
author = "{Coleman Miller}, M. and Hamilton, {Russell J}",
year = "1993",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "411",
pages = "298--301",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of magnetic inclination angle determinations for pulsars

AU - Coleman Miller, M.

AU - Hamilton, Russell J

PY - 1993/7/1

Y1 - 1993/7/1

N2 - We compare the recent estimates of the inclination angle α between the rotation and magnetic axes of 56 pulsars made by both Lyne & Manchester and Rankin. Their results agree reasonably well when α is ≲40°; however, there is no correlation between the two estimates of α if either estimate exceeds 40°. The correlation is better for pulsars with beams having more complicated core structure. Nevertheless, the differences between the two sets of estimates are large enough that use of these estimates to investigate pulsar physics is questionable. We discuss the method for determining α based on the Radhakrishnan & Cooke single-vector model, emphasizing its sensitivity to measurement errors. This method complements the approaches of Rankin and Lyne & Manchester and is preferable when accurate polarization data are available.

AB - We compare the recent estimates of the inclination angle α between the rotation and magnetic axes of 56 pulsars made by both Lyne & Manchester and Rankin. Their results agree reasonably well when α is ≲40°; however, there is no correlation between the two estimates of α if either estimate exceeds 40°. The correlation is better for pulsars with beams having more complicated core structure. Nevertheless, the differences between the two sets of estimates are large enough that use of these estimates to investigate pulsar physics is questionable. We discuss the method for determining α based on the Radhakrishnan & Cooke single-vector model, emphasizing its sensitivity to measurement errors. This method complements the approaches of Rankin and Lyne & Manchester and is preferable when accurate polarization data are available.

KW - Pulsars: general

KW - Stars: neutron

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12044259944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12044259944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 411

SP - 298

EP - 301

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 1

ER -