Religiosity and Support for Killing Animals: Evidence of a Curvilinear Relationship

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research shows that the correlation between religiosity and support for animal rights can be positive, negative, or zero. We hypothesized that this relationship may actually be curvilinear, where a moderate degree of religiosity may reduce support for killing animals (compared with non-religiosity or atheism), but a very high degree of religiosity (e.g., fundamentalism) might increase support for killing animals. We tested this hypothesis in a large sample of American undergraduate students, using a correlational study design with self-report measures of religiosity and of support for killing animals in different domains. The results indicated that, in support of our hypothesis, the relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals is curvilinear, as moderate levels of religiosity were related to less support for killing animals. People who were either not religious at all or very religious were the ones who most supported the killing of animals. Belief in God in itself was related to less support for killing animals. We then replicated the curvilinear relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals using data from four experiments from a previously published article on support for killing animals. We briefly consider possible explanations for these findings, the limitations of the study, and propose directions for future research. Overall, we believe that this study helps clarify the complex relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals, and advances the scientific understanding of the psychological forces that motivate people to support or object to the killing of animals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)695-709
Number of pages15
JournalAnthrozoos
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2 2018

Fingerprint

animal
evidence
animals
Animal Rights
atheism
fundamentalism
college students
animal welfare
Self Report
god
experimental design
Students
Psychology
experiment
Research

Keywords

  • attitudes
  • belief in God
  • human–animal interaction
  • killing
  • religiosity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Anthropology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • veterinary (miscalleneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Religiosity and Support for Killing Animals : Evidence of a Curvilinear Relationship. / Lifshin, Uri; Greenberg, Jeff L; Sullivan, Daniel L.

In: Anthrozoos, Vol. 31, No. 6, 02.11.2018, p. 695-709.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{34f734ce964545bdbc61b76c6c1dd07d,
title = "Religiosity and Support for Killing Animals: Evidence of a Curvilinear Relationship",
abstract = "Prior research shows that the correlation between religiosity and support for animal rights can be positive, negative, or zero. We hypothesized that this relationship may actually be curvilinear, where a moderate degree of religiosity may reduce support for killing animals (compared with non-religiosity or atheism), but a very high degree of religiosity (e.g., fundamentalism) might increase support for killing animals. We tested this hypothesis in a large sample of American undergraduate students, using a correlational study design with self-report measures of religiosity and of support for killing animals in different domains. The results indicated that, in support of our hypothesis, the relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals is curvilinear, as moderate levels of religiosity were related to less support for killing animals. People who were either not religious at all or very religious were the ones who most supported the killing of animals. Belief in God in itself was related to less support for killing animals. We then replicated the curvilinear relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals using data from four experiments from a previously published article on support for killing animals. We briefly consider possible explanations for these findings, the limitations of the study, and propose directions for future research. Overall, we believe that this study helps clarify the complex relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals, and advances the scientific understanding of the psychological forces that motivate people to support or object to the killing of animals.",
keywords = "attitudes, belief in God, human–animal interaction, killing, religiosity",
author = "Uri Lifshin and Greenberg, {Jeff L} and Sullivan, {Daniel L}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/08927936.2018.1529352",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "695--709",
journal = "Anthrozoos",
issn = "0892-7936",
publisher = "Berg Publishers",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Religiosity and Support for Killing Animals

T2 - Evidence of a Curvilinear Relationship

AU - Lifshin, Uri

AU - Greenberg, Jeff L

AU - Sullivan, Daniel L

PY - 2018/11/2

Y1 - 2018/11/2

N2 - Prior research shows that the correlation between religiosity and support for animal rights can be positive, negative, or zero. We hypothesized that this relationship may actually be curvilinear, where a moderate degree of religiosity may reduce support for killing animals (compared with non-religiosity or atheism), but a very high degree of religiosity (e.g., fundamentalism) might increase support for killing animals. We tested this hypothesis in a large sample of American undergraduate students, using a correlational study design with self-report measures of religiosity and of support for killing animals in different domains. The results indicated that, in support of our hypothesis, the relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals is curvilinear, as moderate levels of religiosity were related to less support for killing animals. People who were either not religious at all or very religious were the ones who most supported the killing of animals. Belief in God in itself was related to less support for killing animals. We then replicated the curvilinear relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals using data from four experiments from a previously published article on support for killing animals. We briefly consider possible explanations for these findings, the limitations of the study, and propose directions for future research. Overall, we believe that this study helps clarify the complex relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals, and advances the scientific understanding of the psychological forces that motivate people to support or object to the killing of animals.

AB - Prior research shows that the correlation between religiosity and support for animal rights can be positive, negative, or zero. We hypothesized that this relationship may actually be curvilinear, where a moderate degree of religiosity may reduce support for killing animals (compared with non-religiosity or atheism), but a very high degree of religiosity (e.g., fundamentalism) might increase support for killing animals. We tested this hypothesis in a large sample of American undergraduate students, using a correlational study design with self-report measures of religiosity and of support for killing animals in different domains. The results indicated that, in support of our hypothesis, the relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals is curvilinear, as moderate levels of religiosity were related to less support for killing animals. People who were either not religious at all or very religious were the ones who most supported the killing of animals. Belief in God in itself was related to less support for killing animals. We then replicated the curvilinear relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals using data from four experiments from a previously published article on support for killing animals. We briefly consider possible explanations for these findings, the limitations of the study, and propose directions for future research. Overall, we believe that this study helps clarify the complex relationship between religiosity and support for killing animals, and advances the scientific understanding of the psychological forces that motivate people to support or object to the killing of animals.

KW - attitudes

KW - belief in God

KW - human–animal interaction

KW - killing

KW - religiosity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057194010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057194010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08927936.2018.1529352

DO - 10.1080/08927936.2018.1529352

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85057194010

VL - 31

SP - 695

EP - 709

JO - Anthrozoos

JF - Anthrozoos

SN - 0892-7936

IS - 6

ER -