Reply to a Comment on “Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity”

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this short note I reply to criticisms of an argument in my paper (Healey in Found Phys 48:1568–1589, 2018) that appear in comment (Baumann et al. in Found Phys 49:741–749, 2019). Baumann et al. raise one “main criticism” then go on to claim that the argument of Healey contains a series of problems. But their “main criticism” is not an objection to the argument and the problems are of their own making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)816-819
Number of pages4
JournalFoundations of Physics
Volume49
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2019

Fingerprint

quantum theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Reply to a Comment on “Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity”. / Healey, Richard A.

In: Foundations of Physics, Vol. 49, No. 8, 15.08.2019, p. 816-819.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6d72598f61204b2e9f1a89122d03973a,
title = "Reply to a Comment on “Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity”",
abstract = "In this short note I reply to criticisms of an argument in my paper (Healey in Found Phys 48:1568–1589, 2018) that appear in comment (Baumann et al. in Found Phys 49:741–749, 2019). Baumann et al. raise one “main criticism” then go on to claim that the argument of Healey contains a series of problems. But their “main criticism” is not an objection to the argument and the problems are of their own making.",
author = "Healey, {Richard A}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s10701-019-00290-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "816--819",
journal = "Foundations of Physics",
issn = "0015-9018",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to a Comment on “Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity”

AU - Healey, Richard A

PY - 2019/8/15

Y1 - 2019/8/15

N2 - In this short note I reply to criticisms of an argument in my paper (Healey in Found Phys 48:1568–1589, 2018) that appear in comment (Baumann et al. in Found Phys 49:741–749, 2019). Baumann et al. raise one “main criticism” then go on to claim that the argument of Healey contains a series of problems. But their “main criticism” is not an objection to the argument and the problems are of their own making.

AB - In this short note I reply to criticisms of an argument in my paper (Healey in Found Phys 48:1568–1589, 2018) that appear in comment (Baumann et al. in Found Phys 49:741–749, 2019). Baumann et al. raise one “main criticism” then go on to claim that the argument of Healey contains a series of problems. But their “main criticism” is not an objection to the argument and the problems are of their own making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071239690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071239690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10701-019-00290-y

DO - 10.1007/s10701-019-00290-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071239690

VL - 49

SP - 816

EP - 819

JO - Foundations of Physics

JF - Foundations of Physics

SN - 0015-9018

IS - 8

ER -