Reply to 'an analytical error invalidates the 'depolarization' of the perceptual magnet effect' [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3576-3577 (2000)]

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a previous paper, Lotto et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3648-3655 (1998)] claimed that experiments investigating a perceptual magnet effect (PME) failed to demonstrate a novel effect of goodness judgments on speech sound discrimination due to a confound in the procedure. New analyses of these data and a review of the recent literature fail once again to support the existence of PME. (C) 2000 Acoustical Society of America.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3578-3580
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume107
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to 'an analytical error invalidates the 'depolarization' of the perceptual magnet effect' [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3576-3577 (2000)]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this