Reply to "comment on 'coupled dynamics of atoms and radiation-pressure-driven interferometers' and 'superstrong coupling regime of cavity quantum electrodynamics'"

D. Meiser, Pierre Meystre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In their Comment, Asbóth and Domokos question the consistency of two approximations introduced in two recent articles. They show that the minimization of the atomic dipole potential does not in general give rise to a regular lattice of ultracold atoms and that the steady-state positions of atoms in a cavity are not normally characterized by a minimum of the dipole potential. Instead, the steady-state positions correspond to a vanishing force on each individual atom, the relevant force being proportional to the derivative of the optical field mode function. We agree with Asbóth and Domokos that the atomic lattice should be irregular. Using a microscopic model we show however that in the regime considered in our works and also in the preceding Comment the concept of force is generally not well defined, and a semiclassical theory may be inadequate for the description of the atomic motion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number057802
JournalPhysical Review A
Volume76
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 9 2007

Fingerprint

radiation pressure
quantum electrodynamics
interferometers
cavities
dipoles
atoms
optimization
approximation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

@article{73a9468713274f98a3aeafb11a7985e7,
title = "Reply to {"}comment on 'coupled dynamics of atoms and radiation-pressure-driven interferometers' and 'superstrong coupling regime of cavity quantum electrodynamics'{"}",
abstract = "In their Comment, Asb{\'o}th and Domokos question the consistency of two approximations introduced in two recent articles. They show that the minimization of the atomic dipole potential does not in general give rise to a regular lattice of ultracold atoms and that the steady-state positions of atoms in a cavity are not normally characterized by a minimum of the dipole potential. Instead, the steady-state positions correspond to a vanishing force on each individual atom, the relevant force being proportional to the derivative of the optical field mode function. We agree with Asb{\'o}th and Domokos that the atomic lattice should be irregular. Using a microscopic model we show however that in the regime considered in our works and also in the preceding Comment the concept of force is generally not well defined, and a semiclassical theory may be inadequate for the description of the atomic motion.",
author = "D. Meiser and Pierre Meystre",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevA.76.057802",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
journal = "Physical Review A",
issn = "2469-9926",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to "comment on 'coupled dynamics of atoms and radiation-pressure-driven interferometers' and 'superstrong coupling regime of cavity quantum electrodynamics'"

AU - Meiser, D.

AU - Meystre, Pierre

PY - 2007/11/9

Y1 - 2007/11/9

N2 - In their Comment, Asbóth and Domokos question the consistency of two approximations introduced in two recent articles. They show that the minimization of the atomic dipole potential does not in general give rise to a regular lattice of ultracold atoms and that the steady-state positions of atoms in a cavity are not normally characterized by a minimum of the dipole potential. Instead, the steady-state positions correspond to a vanishing force on each individual atom, the relevant force being proportional to the derivative of the optical field mode function. We agree with Asbóth and Domokos that the atomic lattice should be irregular. Using a microscopic model we show however that in the regime considered in our works and also in the preceding Comment the concept of force is generally not well defined, and a semiclassical theory may be inadequate for the description of the atomic motion.

AB - In their Comment, Asbóth and Domokos question the consistency of two approximations introduced in two recent articles. They show that the minimization of the atomic dipole potential does not in general give rise to a regular lattice of ultracold atoms and that the steady-state positions of atoms in a cavity are not normally characterized by a minimum of the dipole potential. Instead, the steady-state positions correspond to a vanishing force on each individual atom, the relevant force being proportional to the derivative of the optical field mode function. We agree with Asbóth and Domokos that the atomic lattice should be irregular. Using a microscopic model we show however that in the regime considered in our works and also in the preceding Comment the concept of force is generally not well defined, and a semiclassical theory may be inadequate for the description of the atomic motion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36048999588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36048999588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.057802

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.057802

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36048999588

VL - 76

JO - Physical Review A

JF - Physical Review A

SN - 2469-9926

IS - 5

M1 - 057802

ER -