Representation and leadership in post-communist political systems

Richard Rose, William T Mishler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ideally, a democratic system is representative and has effective leaders. But in postcommunist political systems it is an open question whether leadership and representation are mutually supportive or in conflict. Survey data from the New Democracies Barometer, used to analyse the priority that people in nine Central and East European countries give to representation in parliament and to strong leaders, allow a distinction to be made between representative democrats and leadership democrats, and to distinguish both from authoritarians who value strong leadership without parliament and those disaffected with both. A discriminant function analysis shows that political attitudes towards democracy and markets and towards order and economic security are most important in determining views of governance. National differences are indirectly significant, inasmuch as views of individuals about leadership vary with national context. Where there has been a history of repressive dictatorship, people are more likely to value representation and reject strong leadership.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)224-247
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics
Volume12
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

political system
leadership
democracy
parliament
leader
political attitude
dictatorship
Values
governance
market
history
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Representation and leadership in post-communist political systems. / Rose, Richard; Mishler, William T.

In: Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 12, No. 2, 06.1996, p. 224-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a78b0a22244406ab3b226edc5349113,
title = "Representation and leadership in post-communist political systems",
abstract = "Ideally, a democratic system is representative and has effective leaders. But in postcommunist political systems it is an open question whether leadership and representation are mutually supportive or in conflict. Survey data from the New Democracies Barometer, used to analyse the priority that people in nine Central and East European countries give to representation in parliament and to strong leaders, allow a distinction to be made between representative democrats and leadership democrats, and to distinguish both from authoritarians who value strong leadership without parliament and those disaffected with both. A discriminant function analysis shows that political attitudes towards democracy and markets and towards order and economic security are most important in determining views of governance. National differences are indirectly significant, inasmuch as views of individuals about leadership vary with national context. Where there has been a history of repressive dictatorship, people are more likely to value representation and reject strong leadership.",
author = "Richard Rose and Mishler, {William T}",
year = "1996",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "224--247",
journal = "Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics",
issn = "1352-3279",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Representation and leadership in post-communist political systems

AU - Rose, Richard

AU - Mishler, William T

PY - 1996/6

Y1 - 1996/6

N2 - Ideally, a democratic system is representative and has effective leaders. But in postcommunist political systems it is an open question whether leadership and representation are mutually supportive or in conflict. Survey data from the New Democracies Barometer, used to analyse the priority that people in nine Central and East European countries give to representation in parliament and to strong leaders, allow a distinction to be made between representative democrats and leadership democrats, and to distinguish both from authoritarians who value strong leadership without parliament and those disaffected with both. A discriminant function analysis shows that political attitudes towards democracy and markets and towards order and economic security are most important in determining views of governance. National differences are indirectly significant, inasmuch as views of individuals about leadership vary with national context. Where there has been a history of repressive dictatorship, people are more likely to value representation and reject strong leadership.

AB - Ideally, a democratic system is representative and has effective leaders. But in postcommunist political systems it is an open question whether leadership and representation are mutually supportive or in conflict. Survey data from the New Democracies Barometer, used to analyse the priority that people in nine Central and East European countries give to representation in parliament and to strong leaders, allow a distinction to be made between representative democrats and leadership democrats, and to distinguish both from authoritarians who value strong leadership without parliament and those disaffected with both. A discriminant function analysis shows that political attitudes towards democracy and markets and towards order and economic security are most important in determining views of governance. National differences are indirectly significant, inasmuch as views of individuals about leadership vary with national context. Where there has been a history of repressive dictatorship, people are more likely to value representation and reject strong leadership.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030423980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030423980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030423980

VL - 12

SP - 224

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics

JF - Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics

SN - 1352-3279

IS - 2

ER -