Representation of object location in 6.5-month-old infants

Teresa Wilcox, Rosemary Rosser, Lynn Nadel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Within a small bounded space, the location of a hidden object can be coded in terms of distance information, general area of hiding, or the boundary of the space. 6.5-month-old infants' use of these three coding strategies was examined using a visual search task. Infants watched as an object was hidden at one of four identical locations. After a short delay (10 s), the object either reappeared at the location where it was hidden (possible event), or reappeared at one of the other three locations (impossible event). Looking behavior was not systematically influenced by the amount of distance the object moved from the original location of hiding or by whether the object was hidden near a boundary. Infants did not appear to code the location of a hidden object in terms of distance information, general area of hiding, or whether it was hidden at a boundary. However, the location of reappearance (i.e., impossible event) did influence looking times. Infants were surprised when the object reappeared at a boundary position that was previously unoccupied. They were not surprised when the object reappeared at a central location. Thus, two factors influenced coding of location: boundary information (but in a different way than specified) and the nature of the change (absence vs. presence of an object). The influence of these two factors on coding of spatial information was discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-209
Number of pages17
JournalCognitive Development
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Representation of object location in 6.5-month-old infants. / Wilcox, Teresa; Rosser, Rosemary; Nadel, Lynn.

In: Cognitive Development, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1994, p. 193-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wilcox, Teresa ; Rosser, Rosemary ; Nadel, Lynn. / Representation of object location in 6.5-month-old infants. In: Cognitive Development. 1994 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 193-209.
@article{2e083a34214d4248bf28570df0d65b25,
title = "Representation of object location in 6.5-month-old infants",
abstract = "Within a small bounded space, the location of a hidden object can be coded in terms of distance information, general area of hiding, or the boundary of the space. 6.5-month-old infants' use of these three coding strategies was examined using a visual search task. Infants watched as an object was hidden at one of four identical locations. After a short delay (10 s), the object either reappeared at the location where it was hidden (possible event), or reappeared at one of the other three locations (impossible event). Looking behavior was not systematically influenced by the amount of distance the object moved from the original location of hiding or by whether the object was hidden near a boundary. Infants did not appear to code the location of a hidden object in terms of distance information, general area of hiding, or whether it was hidden at a boundary. However, the location of reappearance (i.e., impossible event) did influence looking times. Infants were surprised when the object reappeared at a boundary position that was previously unoccupied. They were not surprised when the object reappeared at a central location. Thus, two factors influenced coding of location: boundary information (but in a different way than specified) and the nature of the change (absence vs. presence of an object). The influence of these two factors on coding of spatial information was discussed.",
author = "Teresa Wilcox and Rosemary Rosser and Lynn Nadel",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/0885-2014(94)90003-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "193--209",
journal = "Cognitive Development",
issn = "0885-2014",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Representation of object location in 6.5-month-old infants

AU - Wilcox, Teresa

AU - Rosser, Rosemary

AU - Nadel, Lynn

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Within a small bounded space, the location of a hidden object can be coded in terms of distance information, general area of hiding, or the boundary of the space. 6.5-month-old infants' use of these three coding strategies was examined using a visual search task. Infants watched as an object was hidden at one of four identical locations. After a short delay (10 s), the object either reappeared at the location where it was hidden (possible event), or reappeared at one of the other three locations (impossible event). Looking behavior was not systematically influenced by the amount of distance the object moved from the original location of hiding or by whether the object was hidden near a boundary. Infants did not appear to code the location of a hidden object in terms of distance information, general area of hiding, or whether it was hidden at a boundary. However, the location of reappearance (i.e., impossible event) did influence looking times. Infants were surprised when the object reappeared at a boundary position that was previously unoccupied. They were not surprised when the object reappeared at a central location. Thus, two factors influenced coding of location: boundary information (but in a different way than specified) and the nature of the change (absence vs. presence of an object). The influence of these two factors on coding of spatial information was discussed.

AB - Within a small bounded space, the location of a hidden object can be coded in terms of distance information, general area of hiding, or the boundary of the space. 6.5-month-old infants' use of these three coding strategies was examined using a visual search task. Infants watched as an object was hidden at one of four identical locations. After a short delay (10 s), the object either reappeared at the location where it was hidden (possible event), or reappeared at one of the other three locations (impossible event). Looking behavior was not systematically influenced by the amount of distance the object moved from the original location of hiding or by whether the object was hidden near a boundary. Infants did not appear to code the location of a hidden object in terms of distance information, general area of hiding, or whether it was hidden at a boundary. However, the location of reappearance (i.e., impossible event) did influence looking times. Infants were surprised when the object reappeared at a boundary position that was previously unoccupied. They were not surprised when the object reappeared at a central location. Thus, two factors influenced coding of location: boundary information (but in a different way than specified) and the nature of the change (absence vs. presence of an object). The influence of these two factors on coding of spatial information was discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149144392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149144392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0885-2014(94)90003-5

DO - 10.1016/0885-2014(94)90003-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38149144392

VL - 9

SP - 193

EP - 209

JO - Cognitive Development

JF - Cognitive Development

SN - 0885-2014

IS - 2

ER -