Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements with a hand held autorefractor in children

Erin M Harvey, Joseph M Miller, L. Keith Wagner, Velma Dobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim - To determine reproducibility and accuracy of the Nikon Retinomax autorefractor when used with children who were made cycloplegic. Methods - Autorefraction and retinoscopy or subjectively refined retinoscopy (where, under the patient's direction, the refraction was varied until the best visual acuity was achieved) were performed on the right eye of 47 children, age 11-93 months. Autorefraction was performed using the Nikon Retinomax, which provides up to eight measured values of refractive error and one representative measurement of refractive error. Results - Autorefractor measurements were successfully obtained from 7/9 children age 3 years or younger, and from all older children. Vector methods were used to calculate differences. Retinomax reproducibility averaged 0.43 D. Unbiased Retinomax and retinoscopy measurements differed by an average of 0.82 D. Unbiased Retinomax and subjectively refined retinoscopy differed by an average of 1.03 D. Conclusions - Reproducibility of Retinomax measured values in children is comparable with reproducibility of retinoscopy, subjective refraction, and autorefraction measurements in adults. Agreement between Retinomax and retinoscopy and agreement between Retinomax and subjective refinement in children is comparable with agreement between autorefraction and subjective refraction in adults. The study indicates that the Retinomax is a useful instrument for measuring refractive errors in young children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)941-948
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume81
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1997

Fingerprint

Retinoscopy
Hand
Refractive Errors
Mydriatics
Visual Acuity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements with a hand held autorefractor in children. / Harvey, Erin M; Miller, Joseph M; Wagner, L. Keith; Dobson, Velma.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 81, No. 11, 11.1997, p. 941-948.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{151ce47aef994d428276315a662c9e64,
title = "Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements with a hand held autorefractor in children",
abstract = "Aim - To determine reproducibility and accuracy of the Nikon Retinomax autorefractor when used with children who were made cycloplegic. Methods - Autorefraction and retinoscopy or subjectively refined retinoscopy (where, under the patient's direction, the refraction was varied until the best visual acuity was achieved) were performed on the right eye of 47 children, age 11-93 months. Autorefraction was performed using the Nikon Retinomax, which provides up to eight measured values of refractive error and one representative measurement of refractive error. Results - Autorefractor measurements were successfully obtained from 7/9 children age 3 years or younger, and from all older children. Vector methods were used to calculate differences. Retinomax reproducibility averaged 0.43 D. Unbiased Retinomax and retinoscopy measurements differed by an average of 0.82 D. Unbiased Retinomax and subjectively refined retinoscopy differed by an average of 1.03 D. Conclusions - Reproducibility of Retinomax measured values in children is comparable with reproducibility of retinoscopy, subjective refraction, and autorefraction measurements in adults. Agreement between Retinomax and retinoscopy and agreement between Retinomax and subjective refinement in children is comparable with agreement between autorefraction and subjective refraction in adults. The study indicates that the Retinomax is a useful instrument for measuring refractive errors in young children.",
author = "Harvey, {Erin M} and Miller, {Joseph M} and Wagner, {L. Keith} and Velma Dobson",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "941--948",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements with a hand held autorefractor in children

AU - Harvey, Erin M

AU - Miller, Joseph M

AU - Wagner, L. Keith

AU - Dobson, Velma

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - Aim - To determine reproducibility and accuracy of the Nikon Retinomax autorefractor when used with children who were made cycloplegic. Methods - Autorefraction and retinoscopy or subjectively refined retinoscopy (where, under the patient's direction, the refraction was varied until the best visual acuity was achieved) were performed on the right eye of 47 children, age 11-93 months. Autorefraction was performed using the Nikon Retinomax, which provides up to eight measured values of refractive error and one representative measurement of refractive error. Results - Autorefractor measurements were successfully obtained from 7/9 children age 3 years or younger, and from all older children. Vector methods were used to calculate differences. Retinomax reproducibility averaged 0.43 D. Unbiased Retinomax and retinoscopy measurements differed by an average of 0.82 D. Unbiased Retinomax and subjectively refined retinoscopy differed by an average of 1.03 D. Conclusions - Reproducibility of Retinomax measured values in children is comparable with reproducibility of retinoscopy, subjective refraction, and autorefraction measurements in adults. Agreement between Retinomax and retinoscopy and agreement between Retinomax and subjective refinement in children is comparable with agreement between autorefraction and subjective refraction in adults. The study indicates that the Retinomax is a useful instrument for measuring refractive errors in young children.

AB - Aim - To determine reproducibility and accuracy of the Nikon Retinomax autorefractor when used with children who were made cycloplegic. Methods - Autorefraction and retinoscopy or subjectively refined retinoscopy (where, under the patient's direction, the refraction was varied until the best visual acuity was achieved) were performed on the right eye of 47 children, age 11-93 months. Autorefraction was performed using the Nikon Retinomax, which provides up to eight measured values of refractive error and one representative measurement of refractive error. Results - Autorefractor measurements were successfully obtained from 7/9 children age 3 years or younger, and from all older children. Vector methods were used to calculate differences. Retinomax reproducibility averaged 0.43 D. Unbiased Retinomax and retinoscopy measurements differed by an average of 0.82 D. Unbiased Retinomax and subjectively refined retinoscopy differed by an average of 1.03 D. Conclusions - Reproducibility of Retinomax measured values in children is comparable with reproducibility of retinoscopy, subjective refraction, and autorefraction measurements in adults. Agreement between Retinomax and retinoscopy and agreement between Retinomax and subjective refinement in children is comparable with agreement between autorefraction and subjective refraction in adults. The study indicates that the Retinomax is a useful instrument for measuring refractive errors in young children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030862133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030862133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9505815

AN - SCOPUS:0030862133

VL - 81

SP - 941

EP - 948

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 11

ER -