Reproducibility of hydraulic tomography estimates and their predictions

A two-year case study in Taiwan

Jyun Lin Chen, Jet Chau Wen, Tian-Chyi J Yeh, Kun Yi Andrew Lin, Yu Li Wang, Shao Yang Huang, Yang Ma, Chia Yii Yu, Cheng Haw Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past decades, a new aquifer test technology (sequential pumping tests or hydraulic tomography, HT) has been developed and successfully applied to many field sites to delineate the spatial distributions of hydraulic properties (e.g., transmissivity (T) and storage coefficient (S)). Yet, the reproducibility of its estimated T and S fields and the predictive capabilities of the estimates for different flow scenarios at different time periods remain unexplored. That is to say, if the estimated fields based on sequential pumping tests conducted during different years are the same since the geologic formation and processes may have undergone changes. In order to answer this important question, this study first compares the drawdown-time behaviors from the sequential pumping tests (SPTs) conducted in 2010 with those conducted in 2012 at a field site and then finds they are similar but different in detail. It then uses these data to estimate the T and S fields and checks the reproducibility of the estimates. The estimated heterogeneity patterns are found to be generally reproducible in spite of uncertainties. In addition, the estimates from each year are capable of predicting the observed drawdowns, induced by independent pumping tests during the corresponding year (i.e., self-validation). Moreover, the estimated fields are cross-validated. That is, this study uses the estimates obtained from the 2010 pumping tests to predict the observed drawdowns of the independent pumping tests conducted in 2012. Likewise, it uses the estimates from 2012 pumping tests to forecast the drawdowns of the independent pumping tests of 2010. The results of both self-validation and cross-validation indicate that the estimated T and S fields based on the test in one year can be used to predict bulk flow behavior in the other year. Differences in detailed behaviors may be attributed to changes in the processes, omitted in the depth-averaged flow model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-134
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Hydrology
Volume569
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

tomography
pumping
hydraulics
prediction
drawdown
test
transmissivity
hydraulic property
aquifer
spatial distribution

Keywords

  • Hydraulic tomography (HT)
  • Reproducibility
  • Sequential pumping test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Reproducibility of hydraulic tomography estimates and their predictions : A two-year case study in Taiwan. / Chen, Jyun Lin; Wen, Jet Chau; Yeh, Tian-Chyi J; Andrew Lin, Kun Yi; Wang, Yu Li; Huang, Shao Yang; Ma, Yang; Yu, Chia Yii; Lee, Cheng Haw.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 569, 01.02.2019, p. 117-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Jyun Lin ; Wen, Jet Chau ; Yeh, Tian-Chyi J ; Andrew Lin, Kun Yi ; Wang, Yu Li ; Huang, Shao Yang ; Ma, Yang ; Yu, Chia Yii ; Lee, Cheng Haw. / Reproducibility of hydraulic tomography estimates and their predictions : A two-year case study in Taiwan. In: Journal of Hydrology. 2019 ; Vol. 569. pp. 117-134.
@article{fb0aca8c43c74ff488319a889bd72876,
title = "Reproducibility of hydraulic tomography estimates and their predictions: A two-year case study in Taiwan",
abstract = "Over the past decades, a new aquifer test technology (sequential pumping tests or hydraulic tomography, HT) has been developed and successfully applied to many field sites to delineate the spatial distributions of hydraulic properties (e.g., transmissivity (T) and storage coefficient (S)). Yet, the reproducibility of its estimated T and S fields and the predictive capabilities of the estimates for different flow scenarios at different time periods remain unexplored. That is to say, if the estimated fields based on sequential pumping tests conducted during different years are the same since the geologic formation and processes may have undergone changes. In order to answer this important question, this study first compares the drawdown-time behaviors from the sequential pumping tests (SPTs) conducted in 2010 with those conducted in 2012 at a field site and then finds they are similar but different in detail. It then uses these data to estimate the T and S fields and checks the reproducibility of the estimates. The estimated heterogeneity patterns are found to be generally reproducible in spite of uncertainties. In addition, the estimates from each year are capable of predicting the observed drawdowns, induced by independent pumping tests during the corresponding year (i.e., self-validation). Moreover, the estimated fields are cross-validated. That is, this study uses the estimates obtained from the 2010 pumping tests to predict the observed drawdowns of the independent pumping tests conducted in 2012. Likewise, it uses the estimates from 2012 pumping tests to forecast the drawdowns of the independent pumping tests of 2010. The results of both self-validation and cross-validation indicate that the estimated T and S fields based on the test in one year can be used to predict bulk flow behavior in the other year. Differences in detailed behaviors may be attributed to changes in the processes, omitted in the depth-averaged flow model.",
keywords = "Hydraulic tomography (HT), Reproducibility, Sequential pumping test",
author = "Chen, {Jyun Lin} and Wen, {Jet Chau} and Yeh, {Tian-Chyi J} and {Andrew Lin}, {Kun Yi} and Wang, {Yu Li} and Huang, {Shao Yang} and Yang Ma and Yu, {Chia Yii} and Lee, {Cheng Haw}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.064",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "569",
pages = "117--134",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of hydraulic tomography estimates and their predictions

T2 - A two-year case study in Taiwan

AU - Chen, Jyun Lin

AU - Wen, Jet Chau

AU - Yeh, Tian-Chyi J

AU - Andrew Lin, Kun Yi

AU - Wang, Yu Li

AU - Huang, Shao Yang

AU - Ma, Yang

AU - Yu, Chia Yii

AU - Lee, Cheng Haw

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Over the past decades, a new aquifer test technology (sequential pumping tests or hydraulic tomography, HT) has been developed and successfully applied to many field sites to delineate the spatial distributions of hydraulic properties (e.g., transmissivity (T) and storage coefficient (S)). Yet, the reproducibility of its estimated T and S fields and the predictive capabilities of the estimates for different flow scenarios at different time periods remain unexplored. That is to say, if the estimated fields based on sequential pumping tests conducted during different years are the same since the geologic formation and processes may have undergone changes. In order to answer this important question, this study first compares the drawdown-time behaviors from the sequential pumping tests (SPTs) conducted in 2010 with those conducted in 2012 at a field site and then finds they are similar but different in detail. It then uses these data to estimate the T and S fields and checks the reproducibility of the estimates. The estimated heterogeneity patterns are found to be generally reproducible in spite of uncertainties. In addition, the estimates from each year are capable of predicting the observed drawdowns, induced by independent pumping tests during the corresponding year (i.e., self-validation). Moreover, the estimated fields are cross-validated. That is, this study uses the estimates obtained from the 2010 pumping tests to predict the observed drawdowns of the independent pumping tests conducted in 2012. Likewise, it uses the estimates from 2012 pumping tests to forecast the drawdowns of the independent pumping tests of 2010. The results of both self-validation and cross-validation indicate that the estimated T and S fields based on the test in one year can be used to predict bulk flow behavior in the other year. Differences in detailed behaviors may be attributed to changes in the processes, omitted in the depth-averaged flow model.

AB - Over the past decades, a new aquifer test technology (sequential pumping tests or hydraulic tomography, HT) has been developed and successfully applied to many field sites to delineate the spatial distributions of hydraulic properties (e.g., transmissivity (T) and storage coefficient (S)). Yet, the reproducibility of its estimated T and S fields and the predictive capabilities of the estimates for different flow scenarios at different time periods remain unexplored. That is to say, if the estimated fields based on sequential pumping tests conducted during different years are the same since the geologic formation and processes may have undergone changes. In order to answer this important question, this study first compares the drawdown-time behaviors from the sequential pumping tests (SPTs) conducted in 2010 with those conducted in 2012 at a field site and then finds they are similar but different in detail. It then uses these data to estimate the T and S fields and checks the reproducibility of the estimates. The estimated heterogeneity patterns are found to be generally reproducible in spite of uncertainties. In addition, the estimates from each year are capable of predicting the observed drawdowns, induced by independent pumping tests during the corresponding year (i.e., self-validation). Moreover, the estimated fields are cross-validated. That is, this study uses the estimates obtained from the 2010 pumping tests to predict the observed drawdowns of the independent pumping tests conducted in 2012. Likewise, it uses the estimates from 2012 pumping tests to forecast the drawdowns of the independent pumping tests of 2010. The results of both self-validation and cross-validation indicate that the estimated T and S fields based on the test in one year can be used to predict bulk flow behavior in the other year. Differences in detailed behaviors may be attributed to changes in the processes, omitted in the depth-averaged flow model.

KW - Hydraulic tomography (HT)

KW - Reproducibility

KW - Sequential pumping test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058064153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058064153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.064

DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.064

M3 - Article

VL - 569

SP - 117

EP - 134

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

ER -