Rescuing justice from equality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the wake of G. A. Cohen's masterful critique of Rawls's work, this paper discusses Rawlsian justice in general and the difference principle in particular. It argues that Rawlsian arguments for the difference principle present a puzzle and that to respond adequately to the puzzle we must engage in rational reconstruction. After explaining the puzzle and considering and rejecting a number of responses to it, the paper begins its reconstructive project. It presents the case for viewing the difference principle as a maximizing prioritarian principle of justice, one that that contains no trace of commitment to equality as a distributive norm. The paper concludes by bringing out some of the implications of viewing Rawlsian justice in this light.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180-212
Number of pages33
JournalSocial Philosophy and Policy
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

equality
justice
reconstruction
commitment
Difference Principle
Equality
Justice
John Rawls
G. A. Cohen
Rational Reconstruction
Distributive

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Rescuing justice from equality. / Wall, Steven P.

In: Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 29, No. 1, 12.2012, p. 180-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{26312c7068144e559c6ef14e15c02f2a,
title = "Rescuing justice from equality",
abstract = "In the wake of G. A. Cohen's masterful critique of Rawls's work, this paper discusses Rawlsian justice in general and the difference principle in particular. It argues that Rawlsian arguments for the difference principle present a puzzle and that to respond adequately to the puzzle we must engage in rational reconstruction. After explaining the puzzle and considering and rejecting a number of responses to it, the paper begins its reconstructive project. It presents the case for viewing the difference principle as a maximizing prioritarian principle of justice, one that that contains no trace of commitment to equality as a distributive norm. The paper concludes by bringing out some of the implications of viewing Rawlsian justice in this light.",
author = "Wall, {Steven P}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1017/S0265052511000136",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "180--212",
journal = "Social Philosophy and Policy",
issn = "0265-0525",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rescuing justice from equality

AU - Wall, Steven P

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - In the wake of G. A. Cohen's masterful critique of Rawls's work, this paper discusses Rawlsian justice in general and the difference principle in particular. It argues that Rawlsian arguments for the difference principle present a puzzle and that to respond adequately to the puzzle we must engage in rational reconstruction. After explaining the puzzle and considering and rejecting a number of responses to it, the paper begins its reconstructive project. It presents the case for viewing the difference principle as a maximizing prioritarian principle of justice, one that that contains no trace of commitment to equality as a distributive norm. The paper concludes by bringing out some of the implications of viewing Rawlsian justice in this light.

AB - In the wake of G. A. Cohen's masterful critique of Rawls's work, this paper discusses Rawlsian justice in general and the difference principle in particular. It argues that Rawlsian arguments for the difference principle present a puzzle and that to respond adequately to the puzzle we must engage in rational reconstruction. After explaining the puzzle and considering and rejecting a number of responses to it, the paper begins its reconstructive project. It presents the case for viewing the difference principle as a maximizing prioritarian principle of justice, one that that contains no trace of commitment to equality as a distributive norm. The paper concludes by bringing out some of the implications of viewing Rawlsian justice in this light.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84255168742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84255168742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0265052511000136

DO - 10.1017/S0265052511000136

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 180

EP - 212

JO - Social Philosophy and Policy

JF - Social Philosophy and Policy

SN - 0265-0525

IS - 1

ER -