Research specialization and collaboration patterns in sociology

Erin E Leahey, Ryan C. Reikowsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers interested in the structure of scientific fields have documented increases in specialization and collaboration. How, if at all, are these two trends related? Is specialization so severe that scholars cannot collaborate unless they share specific research interests? Or, have specializing tendencies promoted research that joins specialty areas and broaches new topics? We answer these important questions for a single discipline, sociology, using both qualitative interviews and latent profile analysis. We empirically identify three collaborative styles that depend on both the areas and extent of specialization in coauthors' research programs. The prominence of the reinforcing generalist profile suggests that specialization in science mainly serves to encourage scholars to work with others in their specialty area. However, the existence of two other styles - a more complementary one and one that is characterized by migration into new intellectual terrain - suggests that subfields within sociology are permeable enough to permit boundary-spanning, original research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)425-440
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Studies of Science
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

specialization
sociology
research interest
qualitative interview
migration
Sociology
trend
science

Keywords

  • Coauthorship
  • Collaboration
  • Research teams
  • Social science specialization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Research specialization and collaboration patterns in sociology. / Leahey, Erin E; Reikowsky, Ryan C.

In: Social Studies of Science, Vol. 38, No. 3, 06.2008, p. 425-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3639df83e9b349ce949c496708b76f4b,
title = "Research specialization and collaboration patterns in sociology",
abstract = "Researchers interested in the structure of scientific fields have documented increases in specialization and collaboration. How, if at all, are these two trends related? Is specialization so severe that scholars cannot collaborate unless they share specific research interests? Or, have specializing tendencies promoted research that joins specialty areas and broaches new topics? We answer these important questions for a single discipline, sociology, using both qualitative interviews and latent profile analysis. We empirically identify three collaborative styles that depend on both the areas and extent of specialization in coauthors' research programs. The prominence of the reinforcing generalist profile suggests that specialization in science mainly serves to encourage scholars to work with others in their specialty area. However, the existence of two other styles - a more complementary one and one that is characterized by migration into new intellectual terrain - suggests that subfields within sociology are permeable enough to permit boundary-spanning, original research.",
keywords = "Coauthorship, Collaboration, Research teams, Social science specialization",
author = "Leahey, {Erin E} and Reikowsky, {Ryan C.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0306312707086190",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "425--440",
journal = "Social Studies of Science",
issn = "0306-3127",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research specialization and collaboration patterns in sociology

AU - Leahey, Erin E

AU - Reikowsky, Ryan C.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Researchers interested in the structure of scientific fields have documented increases in specialization and collaboration. How, if at all, are these two trends related? Is specialization so severe that scholars cannot collaborate unless they share specific research interests? Or, have specializing tendencies promoted research that joins specialty areas and broaches new topics? We answer these important questions for a single discipline, sociology, using both qualitative interviews and latent profile analysis. We empirically identify three collaborative styles that depend on both the areas and extent of specialization in coauthors' research programs. The prominence of the reinforcing generalist profile suggests that specialization in science mainly serves to encourage scholars to work with others in their specialty area. However, the existence of two other styles - a more complementary one and one that is characterized by migration into new intellectual terrain - suggests that subfields within sociology are permeable enough to permit boundary-spanning, original research.

AB - Researchers interested in the structure of scientific fields have documented increases in specialization and collaboration. How, if at all, are these two trends related? Is specialization so severe that scholars cannot collaborate unless they share specific research interests? Or, have specializing tendencies promoted research that joins specialty areas and broaches new topics? We answer these important questions for a single discipline, sociology, using both qualitative interviews and latent profile analysis. We empirically identify three collaborative styles that depend on both the areas and extent of specialization in coauthors' research programs. The prominence of the reinforcing generalist profile suggests that specialization in science mainly serves to encourage scholars to work with others in their specialty area. However, the existence of two other styles - a more complementary one and one that is characterized by migration into new intellectual terrain - suggests that subfields within sociology are permeable enough to permit boundary-spanning, original research.

KW - Coauthorship

KW - Collaboration

KW - Research teams

KW - Social science specialization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43949123829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43949123829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0306312707086190

DO - 10.1177/0306312707086190

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:43949123829

VL - 38

SP - 425

EP - 440

JO - Social Studies of Science

JF - Social Studies of Science

SN - 0306-3127

IS - 3

ER -