Resistance and reconfiguration of natural flexible submerged vegetation in hydrodynamic river modelling

Veerle Verschoren, Dieter Meire, Jonas Schoelynck, Kerst Buis, Kris D. Bal, Peter A Troch, Patrick Meire, Stijn Temmerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In-stream submerged macrophytes have a complex morphology and several species are not rigid, but are flexible and reconfigure along with the major flow direction to avoid potential damage at high stream velocities. However, in numerical hydrodynamic models, they are often simplified to rigid sticks. In this study hydraulic resistance of vegetation is represented by an adapted bottom friction coefficient and is calculated using an existing two layer formulation for which the input parameters were adjusted to account for (i) the temporary reconfiguration based on an empirical relationship between deflected vegetation height and upstream depth-averaged velocity, and (ii) the complex morphology of natural, flexible, submerged macrophytes. The main advantage of this approach is that it removes the need for calibration of the vegetation resistance coefficient. The calculated hydraulic roughness is an input of the hydrodynamic model Telemac 2D, this model simulates depth-averaged stream velocities in and around individual vegetation patches. Firstly, the model was successfully validated against observed data of a laboratory flume experiment with three macrophyte species at three discharges. Secondly, the effect of reconfiguration was tested by modelling an in situ field flume experiment with, and without, the inclusion of macrophyte reconfiguration. The inclusion of reconfiguration decreased the calculated hydraulic roughness which resulted in smaller spatial variations of simulated stream velocities, as compared to the model scenario without macrophyte reconfiguration. We discuss that including macrophyte reconfiguration in numerical models input, can have significant and extensive effects on the model results of hydrodynamic variables and associated ecological and geomorphological parameters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-265
Number of pages21
JournalEnvironmental Fluid Mechanics
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

submerged vegetation
Hydrodynamics
Rivers
hydrodynamics
macrophyte
river
modeling
flume experiment
vegetation
Hydraulics
hydraulics
roughness
Surface roughness
bottom friction
Numerical models
spatial variation
Experiments
Calibration
Friction
calibration

Keywords

  • 2D modelling
  • Macrophytes
  • Open-channel flow
  • Roughness
  • Stream ecosystem

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Resistance and reconfiguration of natural flexible submerged vegetation in hydrodynamic river modelling. / Verschoren, Veerle; Meire, Dieter; Schoelynck, Jonas; Buis, Kerst; Bal, Kris D.; Troch, Peter A; Meire, Patrick; Temmerman, Stijn.

In: Environmental Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 245-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Verschoren, V, Meire, D, Schoelynck, J, Buis, K, Bal, KD, Troch, PA, Meire, P & Temmerman, S 2016, 'Resistance and reconfiguration of natural flexible submerged vegetation in hydrodynamic river modelling', Environmental Fluid Mechanics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 245-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-015-9432-1
Verschoren, Veerle ; Meire, Dieter ; Schoelynck, Jonas ; Buis, Kerst ; Bal, Kris D. ; Troch, Peter A ; Meire, Patrick ; Temmerman, Stijn. / Resistance and reconfiguration of natural flexible submerged vegetation in hydrodynamic river modelling. In: Environmental Fluid Mechanics. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 245-265.
@article{2f92e4a4a3c24ba7aa93a53e317f34a3,
title = "Resistance and reconfiguration of natural flexible submerged vegetation in hydrodynamic river modelling",
abstract = "In-stream submerged macrophytes have a complex morphology and several species are not rigid, but are flexible and reconfigure along with the major flow direction to avoid potential damage at high stream velocities. However, in numerical hydrodynamic models, they are often simplified to rigid sticks. In this study hydraulic resistance of vegetation is represented by an adapted bottom friction coefficient and is calculated using an existing two layer formulation for which the input parameters were adjusted to account for (i) the temporary reconfiguration based on an empirical relationship between deflected vegetation height and upstream depth-averaged velocity, and (ii) the complex morphology of natural, flexible, submerged macrophytes. The main advantage of this approach is that it removes the need for calibration of the vegetation resistance coefficient. The calculated hydraulic roughness is an input of the hydrodynamic model Telemac 2D, this model simulates depth-averaged stream velocities in and around individual vegetation patches. Firstly, the model was successfully validated against observed data of a laboratory flume experiment with three macrophyte species at three discharges. Secondly, the effect of reconfiguration was tested by modelling an in situ field flume experiment with, and without, the inclusion of macrophyte reconfiguration. The inclusion of reconfiguration decreased the calculated hydraulic roughness which resulted in smaller spatial variations of simulated stream velocities, as compared to the model scenario without macrophyte reconfiguration. We discuss that including macrophyte reconfiguration in numerical models input, can have significant and extensive effects on the model results of hydrodynamic variables and associated ecological and geomorphological parameters.",
keywords = "2D modelling, Macrophytes, Open-channel flow, Roughness, Stream ecosystem",
author = "Veerle Verschoren and Dieter Meire and Jonas Schoelynck and Kerst Buis and Bal, {Kris D.} and Troch, {Peter A} and Patrick Meire and Stijn Temmerman",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10652-015-9432-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "245--265",
journal = "Environmental Fluid Mechanics",
issn = "1567-7419",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resistance and reconfiguration of natural flexible submerged vegetation in hydrodynamic river modelling

AU - Verschoren, Veerle

AU - Meire, Dieter

AU - Schoelynck, Jonas

AU - Buis, Kerst

AU - Bal, Kris D.

AU - Troch, Peter A

AU - Meire, Patrick

AU - Temmerman, Stijn

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - In-stream submerged macrophytes have a complex morphology and several species are not rigid, but are flexible and reconfigure along with the major flow direction to avoid potential damage at high stream velocities. However, in numerical hydrodynamic models, they are often simplified to rigid sticks. In this study hydraulic resistance of vegetation is represented by an adapted bottom friction coefficient and is calculated using an existing two layer formulation for which the input parameters were adjusted to account for (i) the temporary reconfiguration based on an empirical relationship between deflected vegetation height and upstream depth-averaged velocity, and (ii) the complex morphology of natural, flexible, submerged macrophytes. The main advantage of this approach is that it removes the need for calibration of the vegetation resistance coefficient. The calculated hydraulic roughness is an input of the hydrodynamic model Telemac 2D, this model simulates depth-averaged stream velocities in and around individual vegetation patches. Firstly, the model was successfully validated against observed data of a laboratory flume experiment with three macrophyte species at three discharges. Secondly, the effect of reconfiguration was tested by modelling an in situ field flume experiment with, and without, the inclusion of macrophyte reconfiguration. The inclusion of reconfiguration decreased the calculated hydraulic roughness which resulted in smaller spatial variations of simulated stream velocities, as compared to the model scenario without macrophyte reconfiguration. We discuss that including macrophyte reconfiguration in numerical models input, can have significant and extensive effects on the model results of hydrodynamic variables and associated ecological and geomorphological parameters.

AB - In-stream submerged macrophytes have a complex morphology and several species are not rigid, but are flexible and reconfigure along with the major flow direction to avoid potential damage at high stream velocities. However, in numerical hydrodynamic models, they are often simplified to rigid sticks. In this study hydraulic resistance of vegetation is represented by an adapted bottom friction coefficient and is calculated using an existing two layer formulation for which the input parameters were adjusted to account for (i) the temporary reconfiguration based on an empirical relationship between deflected vegetation height and upstream depth-averaged velocity, and (ii) the complex morphology of natural, flexible, submerged macrophytes. The main advantage of this approach is that it removes the need for calibration of the vegetation resistance coefficient. The calculated hydraulic roughness is an input of the hydrodynamic model Telemac 2D, this model simulates depth-averaged stream velocities in and around individual vegetation patches. Firstly, the model was successfully validated against observed data of a laboratory flume experiment with three macrophyte species at three discharges. Secondly, the effect of reconfiguration was tested by modelling an in situ field flume experiment with, and without, the inclusion of macrophyte reconfiguration. The inclusion of reconfiguration decreased the calculated hydraulic roughness which resulted in smaller spatial variations of simulated stream velocities, as compared to the model scenario without macrophyte reconfiguration. We discuss that including macrophyte reconfiguration in numerical models input, can have significant and extensive effects on the model results of hydrodynamic variables and associated ecological and geomorphological parameters.

KW - 2D modelling

KW - Macrophytes

KW - Open-channel flow

KW - Roughness

KW - Stream ecosystem

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954392884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954392884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10652-015-9432-1

DO - 10.1007/s10652-015-9432-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84954392884

VL - 16

SP - 245

EP - 265

JO - Environmental Fluid Mechanics

JF - Environmental Fluid Mechanics

SN - 1567-7419

IS - 1

ER -