Resolving the migrant paradox

Two pathways to coalescence in the late precontact U.S. Southwest

Jeffery J. Clark, Jennifer A. Birch, Michelle Hegmon, Barbara J Mills, Donna M. Glowacki, Scott G. Ortman, Jeffrey S. Dean, Rory Gauthier, Patrick D. Lyons, Matthew A. Peeples, Lewis Borck, John A. Ware

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Migrants are viewed as either disruptive and associated with upheaval or socially and economically beneficial to society. This contradiction constitutes a “migrant paradox” that must be resolved to form sustainable multicultural societies. Social and political scientists view contemporary cosmopolitan societies as successful multicultural organizations, but give little attention to the historical processes through which such societies form. This essay takes a deep historical perspective on migration and resultant multicultural societies, often called coalescent societies by North American archaeologists. We examine four dimensions of migration (scale, organization, and pre-migration conditions in homeland and destination) and the resultant coalescent trajectories in two intensively studied cases from the late pre-contact U.S. Southwest. These are Kayenta migrations into southern Arizona and Mesa Verde migrations into the Northern Rio Grande Valley, which resulted in two different coalescent trajectories that resolved the migrant paradox with variable success. Lessons drawn from these cases have contemporary relevance for resolving and providing perspective on the current migration “crisis.” One important finding is that migrant skill and identity persistence, and social distance between migrants and locals are at least as important as the scale of migration in predicting outcomes. Another lesson is that coalescence, especially among socially distant groups, is typically a multigenerational process. Migration crises are often short-term and more perceived than real when viewed from a deep historical perspective. A final lesson is that inclusive institutions and ideologies that foster interaction between migrants and locals with minimal hierarchy greatly facilitate the coalescence process. These institutions and ideologies may already exist within local sociopolitical organizations or may develop within the migrant community as a result of migrant-local interaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Anthropological Archaeology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Coalescence
migrant
migration
Trajectories
multicultural society
Ideologies
society
social distance
Pre-contact
US Southwest
Pathway
Migrants
Paradox
political scientist
interaction
Homelands
social scientist
persistence
contact
organization

Keywords

  • Coalescence
  • Cosmopolitan
  • Kayenta
  • Mesa Verde
  • Migration
  • Multicultural
  • Northern Rio Grande
  • Salado
  • Tewa
  • U.S. Southwest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Archaeology
  • History
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Resolving the migrant paradox : Two pathways to coalescence in the late precontact U.S. Southwest. / Clark, Jeffery J.; Birch, Jennifer A.; Hegmon, Michelle; Mills, Barbara J; Glowacki, Donna M.; Ortman, Scott G.; Dean, Jeffrey S.; Gauthier, Rory; Lyons, Patrick D.; Peeples, Matthew A.; Borck, Lewis; Ware, John A.

In: Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Clark, JJ, Birch, JA, Hegmon, M, Mills, BJ, Glowacki, DM, Ortman, SG, Dean, JS, Gauthier, R, Lyons, PD, Peeples, MA, Borck, L & Ware, JA 2018, 'Resolving the migrant paradox: Two pathways to coalescence in the late precontact U.S. Southwest', Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2018.09.004
Clark, Jeffery J. ; Birch, Jennifer A. ; Hegmon, Michelle ; Mills, Barbara J ; Glowacki, Donna M. ; Ortman, Scott G. ; Dean, Jeffrey S. ; Gauthier, Rory ; Lyons, Patrick D. ; Peeples, Matthew A. ; Borck, Lewis ; Ware, John A. / Resolving the migrant paradox : Two pathways to coalescence in the late precontact U.S. Southwest. In: Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2018.
@article{6f53357cc6ef4c93bd4a7b15d7a0d738,
title = "Resolving the migrant paradox: Two pathways to coalescence in the late precontact U.S. Southwest",
abstract = "Migrants are viewed as either disruptive and associated with upheaval or socially and economically beneficial to society. This contradiction constitutes a “migrant paradox” that must be resolved to form sustainable multicultural societies. Social and political scientists view contemporary cosmopolitan societies as successful multicultural organizations, but give little attention to the historical processes through which such societies form. This essay takes a deep historical perspective on migration and resultant multicultural societies, often called coalescent societies by North American archaeologists. We examine four dimensions of migration (scale, organization, and pre-migration conditions in homeland and destination) and the resultant coalescent trajectories in two intensively studied cases from the late pre-contact U.S. Southwest. These are Kayenta migrations into southern Arizona and Mesa Verde migrations into the Northern Rio Grande Valley, which resulted in two different coalescent trajectories that resolved the migrant paradox with variable success. Lessons drawn from these cases have contemporary relevance for resolving and providing perspective on the current migration “crisis.” One important finding is that migrant skill and identity persistence, and social distance between migrants and locals are at least as important as the scale of migration in predicting outcomes. Another lesson is that coalescence, especially among socially distant groups, is typically a multigenerational process. Migration crises are often short-term and more perceived than real when viewed from a deep historical perspective. A final lesson is that inclusive institutions and ideologies that foster interaction between migrants and locals with minimal hierarchy greatly facilitate the coalescence process. These institutions and ideologies may already exist within local sociopolitical organizations or may develop within the migrant community as a result of migrant-local interaction.",
keywords = "Coalescence, Cosmopolitan, Kayenta, Mesa Verde, Migration, Multicultural, Northern Rio Grande, Salado, Tewa, U.S. Southwest",
author = "Clark, {Jeffery J.} and Birch, {Jennifer A.} and Michelle Hegmon and Mills, {Barbara J} and Glowacki, {Donna M.} and Ortman, {Scott G.} and Dean, {Jeffrey S.} and Rory Gauthier and Lyons, {Patrick D.} and Peeples, {Matthew A.} and Lewis Borck and Ware, {John A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaa.2018.09.004",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Anthropological Archaeology",
issn = "0278-4165",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resolving the migrant paradox

T2 - Two pathways to coalescence in the late precontact U.S. Southwest

AU - Clark, Jeffery J.

AU - Birch, Jennifer A.

AU - Hegmon, Michelle

AU - Mills, Barbara J

AU - Glowacki, Donna M.

AU - Ortman, Scott G.

AU - Dean, Jeffrey S.

AU - Gauthier, Rory

AU - Lyons, Patrick D.

AU - Peeples, Matthew A.

AU - Borck, Lewis

AU - Ware, John A.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Migrants are viewed as either disruptive and associated with upheaval or socially and economically beneficial to society. This contradiction constitutes a “migrant paradox” that must be resolved to form sustainable multicultural societies. Social and political scientists view contemporary cosmopolitan societies as successful multicultural organizations, but give little attention to the historical processes through which such societies form. This essay takes a deep historical perspective on migration and resultant multicultural societies, often called coalescent societies by North American archaeologists. We examine four dimensions of migration (scale, organization, and pre-migration conditions in homeland and destination) and the resultant coalescent trajectories in two intensively studied cases from the late pre-contact U.S. Southwest. These are Kayenta migrations into southern Arizona and Mesa Verde migrations into the Northern Rio Grande Valley, which resulted in two different coalescent trajectories that resolved the migrant paradox with variable success. Lessons drawn from these cases have contemporary relevance for resolving and providing perspective on the current migration “crisis.” One important finding is that migrant skill and identity persistence, and social distance between migrants and locals are at least as important as the scale of migration in predicting outcomes. Another lesson is that coalescence, especially among socially distant groups, is typically a multigenerational process. Migration crises are often short-term and more perceived than real when viewed from a deep historical perspective. A final lesson is that inclusive institutions and ideologies that foster interaction between migrants and locals with minimal hierarchy greatly facilitate the coalescence process. These institutions and ideologies may already exist within local sociopolitical organizations or may develop within the migrant community as a result of migrant-local interaction.

AB - Migrants are viewed as either disruptive and associated with upheaval or socially and economically beneficial to society. This contradiction constitutes a “migrant paradox” that must be resolved to form sustainable multicultural societies. Social and political scientists view contemporary cosmopolitan societies as successful multicultural organizations, but give little attention to the historical processes through which such societies form. This essay takes a deep historical perspective on migration and resultant multicultural societies, often called coalescent societies by North American archaeologists. We examine four dimensions of migration (scale, organization, and pre-migration conditions in homeland and destination) and the resultant coalescent trajectories in two intensively studied cases from the late pre-contact U.S. Southwest. These are Kayenta migrations into southern Arizona and Mesa Verde migrations into the Northern Rio Grande Valley, which resulted in two different coalescent trajectories that resolved the migrant paradox with variable success. Lessons drawn from these cases have contemporary relevance for resolving and providing perspective on the current migration “crisis.” One important finding is that migrant skill and identity persistence, and social distance between migrants and locals are at least as important as the scale of migration in predicting outcomes. Another lesson is that coalescence, especially among socially distant groups, is typically a multigenerational process. Migration crises are often short-term and more perceived than real when viewed from a deep historical perspective. A final lesson is that inclusive institutions and ideologies that foster interaction between migrants and locals with minimal hierarchy greatly facilitate the coalescence process. These institutions and ideologies may already exist within local sociopolitical organizations or may develop within the migrant community as a result of migrant-local interaction.

KW - Coalescence

KW - Cosmopolitan

KW - Kayenta

KW - Mesa Verde

KW - Migration

KW - Multicultural

KW - Northern Rio Grande

KW - Salado

KW - Tewa

KW - U.S. Southwest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053897422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053897422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaa.2018.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jaa.2018.09.004

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

JF - Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

SN - 0278-4165

ER -