Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species

John J Wiens, Carl R. Hutter, Daniel G. Mulcahy, Brice P. Noonan, Ted M. Townsend, Jack W. Sites, Tod W. Reeder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

182 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) are one of the most diverse groups of terrestrial vertebrates. Recent molecular analyses have suggested a very different squamate phylogeny relative to morphological hypotheses, but many aspects remain uncertain from molecular data. Here, we analyse higher-level squamate phylogeny with a molecular dataset of unprecedented size, including 161 squamate species for up to 44 nuclear genes each (33 717 base pairs), using both concatenated and species-tree methods for the first time. Our results strongly resolve most squamate relationships and reveal some surprising results. In contrast to most other recent studies, we find that dibamids and gekkotans are together the sister group to all other squamates. Remarkably, we find that the distinctive scolecophidians (blind snakes) are paraphyletic with respect to other snakes, suggesting that snakes were primitively burrowers and subsequently re-invaded surface habitats. Finally, we find that some clades remain poorly supported, despite our extensive data. Our analyses show that weakly supported clades are associated with relatively short branches for which individual genes often show conflicting relationships. These latter results have important implications for all studies that attempt to resolve phylogenies with large-scale phylogenomic datasets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1043-1046
Number of pages4
JournalBiology Letters
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 23 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lizards
Snakes
Squamata
Phylogeny
snakes
lizards
phylogeny
Genes
genes
sampling
Reptiles
Base Pairing
Ecosystem
Vertebrates
reptiles
vertebrates
habitats
Datasets

Keywords

  • Phylogenomics
  • Phylogeny
  • Reptiles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Wiens, J. J., Hutter, C. R., Mulcahy, D. G., Noonan, B. P., Townsend, T. M., Sites, J. W., & Reeder, T. W. (2012). Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species. Biology Letters, 8(6), 1043-1046. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0703

Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species. / Wiens, John J; Hutter, Carl R.; Mulcahy, Daniel G.; Noonan, Brice P.; Townsend, Ted M.; Sites, Jack W.; Reeder, Tod W.

In: Biology Letters, Vol. 8, No. 6, 23.12.2012, p. 1043-1046.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wiens, JJ, Hutter, CR, Mulcahy, DG, Noonan, BP, Townsend, TM, Sites, JW & Reeder, TW 2012, 'Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species', Biology Letters, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1043-1046. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0703
Wiens, John J ; Hutter, Carl R. ; Mulcahy, Daniel G. ; Noonan, Brice P. ; Townsend, Ted M. ; Sites, Jack W. ; Reeder, Tod W. / Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species. In: Biology Letters. 2012 ; Vol. 8, No. 6. pp. 1043-1046.
@article{5fa687b8e495444db185e6cf5e2b8036,
title = "Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species",
abstract = "Squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) are one of the most diverse groups of terrestrial vertebrates. Recent molecular analyses have suggested a very different squamate phylogeny relative to morphological hypotheses, but many aspects remain uncertain from molecular data. Here, we analyse higher-level squamate phylogeny with a molecular dataset of unprecedented size, including 161 squamate species for up to 44 nuclear genes each (33 717 base pairs), using both concatenated and species-tree methods for the first time. Our results strongly resolve most squamate relationships and reveal some surprising results. In contrast to most other recent studies, we find that dibamids and gekkotans are together the sister group to all other squamates. Remarkably, we find that the distinctive scolecophidians (blind snakes) are paraphyletic with respect to other snakes, suggesting that snakes were primitively burrowers and subsequently re-invaded surface habitats. Finally, we find that some clades remain poorly supported, despite our extensive data. Our analyses show that weakly supported clades are associated with relatively short branches for which individual genes often show conflicting relationships. These latter results have important implications for all studies that attempt to resolve phylogenies with large-scale phylogenomic datasets.",
keywords = "Phylogenomics, Phylogeny, Reptiles",
author = "Wiens, {John J} and Hutter, {Carl R.} and Mulcahy, {Daniel G.} and Noonan, {Brice P.} and Townsend, {Ted M.} and Sites, {Jack W.} and Reeder, {Tod W.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1098/rsbl.2012.0703",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "1043--1046",
journal = "Biology Letters",
issn = "1744-9561",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species

AU - Wiens, John J

AU - Hutter, Carl R.

AU - Mulcahy, Daniel G.

AU - Noonan, Brice P.

AU - Townsend, Ted M.

AU - Sites, Jack W.

AU - Reeder, Tod W.

PY - 2012/12/23

Y1 - 2012/12/23

N2 - Squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) are one of the most diverse groups of terrestrial vertebrates. Recent molecular analyses have suggested a very different squamate phylogeny relative to morphological hypotheses, but many aspects remain uncertain from molecular data. Here, we analyse higher-level squamate phylogeny with a molecular dataset of unprecedented size, including 161 squamate species for up to 44 nuclear genes each (33 717 base pairs), using both concatenated and species-tree methods for the first time. Our results strongly resolve most squamate relationships and reveal some surprising results. In contrast to most other recent studies, we find that dibamids and gekkotans are together the sister group to all other squamates. Remarkably, we find that the distinctive scolecophidians (blind snakes) are paraphyletic with respect to other snakes, suggesting that snakes were primitively burrowers and subsequently re-invaded surface habitats. Finally, we find that some clades remain poorly supported, despite our extensive data. Our analyses show that weakly supported clades are associated with relatively short branches for which individual genes often show conflicting relationships. These latter results have important implications for all studies that attempt to resolve phylogenies with large-scale phylogenomic datasets.

AB - Squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) are one of the most diverse groups of terrestrial vertebrates. Recent molecular analyses have suggested a very different squamate phylogeny relative to morphological hypotheses, but many aspects remain uncertain from molecular data. Here, we analyse higher-level squamate phylogeny with a molecular dataset of unprecedented size, including 161 squamate species for up to 44 nuclear genes each (33 717 base pairs), using both concatenated and species-tree methods for the first time. Our results strongly resolve most squamate relationships and reveal some surprising results. In contrast to most other recent studies, we find that dibamids and gekkotans are together the sister group to all other squamates. Remarkably, we find that the distinctive scolecophidians (blind snakes) are paraphyletic with respect to other snakes, suggesting that snakes were primitively burrowers and subsequently re-invaded surface habitats. Finally, we find that some clades remain poorly supported, despite our extensive data. Our analyses show that weakly supported clades are associated with relatively short branches for which individual genes often show conflicting relationships. These latter results have important implications for all studies that attempt to resolve phylogenies with large-scale phylogenomic datasets.

KW - Phylogenomics

KW - Phylogeny

KW - Reptiles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869787270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869787270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0703

DO - 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0703

M3 - Article

C2 - 22993238

AN - SCOPUS:84869787270

VL - 8

SP - 1043

EP - 1046

JO - Biology Letters

JF - Biology Letters

SN - 1744-9561

IS - 6

ER -