Respirator physiological effects under simulated work conditions

Siddharth Bansal, Philip I Harber, David Yun, David Liu, Yihang Liu, Samantha Wu, David Ng, Silverio Santiago

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the physiological impacts of two respirator types in simulated work conditions. Fifty-six subjects included normal volunteers and persons with mild respiratory impairments (chronic rhinitis, mild COPD, and mild asthma). Respiratory parameters and electrocardiogram were measured using respiratory inductive plethysmography while performing eight work tasks involving low to moderate exertion using two respirators: (1) a dual cartridge half face mask (HFM) respirator, and (2) the N95. Mixed model regression analyses evaluating the effect of task and respirator type showed that task affected tidal volume, minute ventilation, breathing frequency and heart rate; all were greater in heavier tasks. Although respirator type did not affect respiratory volume parameters and flow rates, the HFM led to increase in the inspiratory time, reduction of the expiratory time, and increase in the duty cycle in comparison with the N95. The magnitude of differences was relatively small. The results suggest that most individuals, including persons with mild respiratory impairments, will physiologically tolerate either type of respirator at low to moderate exertion tasks. However, because effective protection depends on proper use, differences in subjective effect may have greater impact than physiological differences. Using respirators may be feasible on a widespread basis if necessary for maintaining essential services in the face of widespread concern about an infectious or terrorist threat.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-227
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mechanical Ventilators
Masks
Plethysmography
Tidal Volume
Rhinitis
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Ventilation
Healthy Volunteers
Electrocardiography
Respiration
Asthma
Heart Rate
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Physiology
  • Plethysmography
  • Pulmonary ventilation
  • Respirator
  • Terrorism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Respirator physiological effects under simulated work conditions. / Bansal, Siddharth; Harber, Philip I; Yun, David; Liu, David; Liu, Yihang; Wu, Samantha; Ng, David; Santiago, Silverio.

In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol. 6, No. 4, 04.2009, p. 221-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bansal, Siddharth ; Harber, Philip I ; Yun, David ; Liu, David ; Liu, Yihang ; Wu, Samantha ; Ng, David ; Santiago, Silverio. / Respirator physiological effects under simulated work conditions. In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2009 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 221-227.
@article{1af55b83d4b64bd3b82d45b18b3ecc93,
title = "Respirator physiological effects under simulated work conditions",
abstract = "This study compared the physiological impacts of two respirator types in simulated work conditions. Fifty-six subjects included normal volunteers and persons with mild respiratory impairments (chronic rhinitis, mild COPD, and mild asthma). Respiratory parameters and electrocardiogram were measured using respiratory inductive plethysmography while performing eight work tasks involving low to moderate exertion using two respirators: (1) a dual cartridge half face mask (HFM) respirator, and (2) the N95. Mixed model regression analyses evaluating the effect of task and respirator type showed that task affected tidal volume, minute ventilation, breathing frequency and heart rate; all were greater in heavier tasks. Although respirator type did not affect respiratory volume parameters and flow rates, the HFM led to increase in the inspiratory time, reduction of the expiratory time, and increase in the duty cycle in comparison with the N95. The magnitude of differences was relatively small. The results suggest that most individuals, including persons with mild respiratory impairments, will physiologically tolerate either type of respirator at low to moderate exertion tasks. However, because effective protection depends on proper use, differences in subjective effect may have greater impact than physiological differences. Using respirators may be feasible on a widespread basis if necessary for maintaining essential services in the face of widespread concern about an infectious or terrorist threat.",
keywords = "Physiology, Plethysmography, Pulmonary ventilation, Respirator, Terrorism",
author = "Siddharth Bansal and Harber, {Philip I} and David Yun and David Liu and Yihang Liu and Samantha Wu and David Ng and Silverio Santiago",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/15459620902729218",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "221--227",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene",
issn = "1545-9624",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Respirator physiological effects under simulated work conditions

AU - Bansal, Siddharth

AU - Harber, Philip I

AU - Yun, David

AU - Liu, David

AU - Liu, Yihang

AU - Wu, Samantha

AU - Ng, David

AU - Santiago, Silverio

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - This study compared the physiological impacts of two respirator types in simulated work conditions. Fifty-six subjects included normal volunteers and persons with mild respiratory impairments (chronic rhinitis, mild COPD, and mild asthma). Respiratory parameters and electrocardiogram were measured using respiratory inductive plethysmography while performing eight work tasks involving low to moderate exertion using two respirators: (1) a dual cartridge half face mask (HFM) respirator, and (2) the N95. Mixed model regression analyses evaluating the effect of task and respirator type showed that task affected tidal volume, minute ventilation, breathing frequency and heart rate; all were greater in heavier tasks. Although respirator type did not affect respiratory volume parameters and flow rates, the HFM led to increase in the inspiratory time, reduction of the expiratory time, and increase in the duty cycle in comparison with the N95. The magnitude of differences was relatively small. The results suggest that most individuals, including persons with mild respiratory impairments, will physiologically tolerate either type of respirator at low to moderate exertion tasks. However, because effective protection depends on proper use, differences in subjective effect may have greater impact than physiological differences. Using respirators may be feasible on a widespread basis if necessary for maintaining essential services in the face of widespread concern about an infectious or terrorist threat.

AB - This study compared the physiological impacts of two respirator types in simulated work conditions. Fifty-six subjects included normal volunteers and persons with mild respiratory impairments (chronic rhinitis, mild COPD, and mild asthma). Respiratory parameters and electrocardiogram were measured using respiratory inductive plethysmography while performing eight work tasks involving low to moderate exertion using two respirators: (1) a dual cartridge half face mask (HFM) respirator, and (2) the N95. Mixed model regression analyses evaluating the effect of task and respirator type showed that task affected tidal volume, minute ventilation, breathing frequency and heart rate; all were greater in heavier tasks. Although respirator type did not affect respiratory volume parameters and flow rates, the HFM led to increase in the inspiratory time, reduction of the expiratory time, and increase in the duty cycle in comparison with the N95. The magnitude of differences was relatively small. The results suggest that most individuals, including persons with mild respiratory impairments, will physiologically tolerate either type of respirator at low to moderate exertion tasks. However, because effective protection depends on proper use, differences in subjective effect may have greater impact than physiological differences. Using respirators may be feasible on a widespread basis if necessary for maintaining essential services in the face of widespread concern about an infectious or terrorist threat.

KW - Physiology

KW - Plethysmography

KW - Pulmonary ventilation

KW - Respirator

KW - Terrorism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61649117750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61649117750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15459620902729218

DO - 10.1080/15459620902729218

M3 - Article

C2 - 19180375

AN - SCOPUS:61649117750

VL - 6

SP - 221

EP - 227

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

SN - 1545-9624

IS - 4

ER -