Response to Coomes & Allen (2009)'Testing the metabolic scaling theory of tree growth'

Scott C. Stark, Lisa Patrick Bentley, Brian Enquist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Coomes & Allen (2009) propose a new statistical method to test the Metabolic Scaling Theory prediction for tree growth rate size scaling (scaling constant α=1/3) presented in Enquist (1999). This method finds values of the scaling constant that yield standardized major axis (SMA) slopes of one in a comparison of allometrically transformed diameter census data. This SMA 'slope-of-one' method produces results that contrast with those generated by maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE; Russo, Wiser & Coomes 2007; Coomes & Allen 2009). We hypothesize that the SMA slope-of-one method is inappropriate for this application because it assumes, unrealistically, that there is no biological or error variance in tree growth size scaling. To test our hypothesis, we simulate 'allometric' tree growth with biological and error variance in parameters and measurements. We find that the SMA slope-of-one method is sensitive to the amount of biological and error variance and consistently returns biassed parameter estimates, while the MLE method displays relatively little bias, particularly at larger sample sizes. Synthesis. The conclusions of Coomes & Allen (2009) should be reconsidered in the light of our findings. Investigations of tree growth rate size scaling must consider the influence of biological and error variance in model-fitting procedures to ultimately unravel the effects of tree architecture and ecological factors on patterns of size-dependent growth.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)741-747
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Ecology
Volume99
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

tree growth
testing
methodology
census data
statistical analysis
method
census
synthesis
prediction
sampling
test
parameter

Keywords

  • Costa Rica
  • Forests
  • Growth rate size scaling
  • Light competition
  • Maximum-likelihood estimation
  • Metabolic scaling theory
  • Plant development and life-history traits
  • San Emilio
  • SMA line-fitting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Response to Coomes & Allen (2009)'Testing the metabolic scaling theory of tree growth'. / Stark, Scott C.; Bentley, Lisa Patrick; Enquist, Brian.

In: Journal of Ecology, Vol. 99, No. 3, 05.2011, p. 741-747.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stark, Scott C. ; Bentley, Lisa Patrick ; Enquist, Brian. / Response to Coomes & Allen (2009)'Testing the metabolic scaling theory of tree growth'. In: Journal of Ecology. 2011 ; Vol. 99, No. 3. pp. 741-747.
@article{a8e286c1e5d544a3bb55553dd157d8cd,
title = "Response to Coomes & Allen (2009)'Testing the metabolic scaling theory of tree growth'",
abstract = "Coomes & Allen (2009) propose a new statistical method to test the Metabolic Scaling Theory prediction for tree growth rate size scaling (scaling constant α=1/3) presented in Enquist (1999). This method finds values of the scaling constant that yield standardized major axis (SMA) slopes of one in a comparison of allometrically transformed diameter census data. This SMA 'slope-of-one' method produces results that contrast with those generated by maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE; Russo, Wiser & Coomes 2007; Coomes & Allen 2009). We hypothesize that the SMA slope-of-one method is inappropriate for this application because it assumes, unrealistically, that there is no biological or error variance in tree growth size scaling. To test our hypothesis, we simulate 'allometric' tree growth with biological and error variance in parameters and measurements. We find that the SMA slope-of-one method is sensitive to the amount of biological and error variance and consistently returns biassed parameter estimates, while the MLE method displays relatively little bias, particularly at larger sample sizes. Synthesis. The conclusions of Coomes & Allen (2009) should be reconsidered in the light of our findings. Investigations of tree growth rate size scaling must consider the influence of biological and error variance in model-fitting procedures to ultimately unravel the effects of tree architecture and ecological factors on patterns of size-dependent growth.",
keywords = "Costa Rica, Forests, Growth rate size scaling, Light competition, Maximum-likelihood estimation, Metabolic scaling theory, Plant development and life-history traits, San Emilio, SMA line-fitting",
author = "Stark, {Scott C.} and Bentley, {Lisa Patrick} and Brian Enquist",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01719.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "741--747",
journal = "Journal of Ecology",
issn = "0022-0477",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Coomes & Allen (2009)'Testing the metabolic scaling theory of tree growth'

AU - Stark, Scott C.

AU - Bentley, Lisa Patrick

AU - Enquist, Brian

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Coomes & Allen (2009) propose a new statistical method to test the Metabolic Scaling Theory prediction for tree growth rate size scaling (scaling constant α=1/3) presented in Enquist (1999). This method finds values of the scaling constant that yield standardized major axis (SMA) slopes of one in a comparison of allometrically transformed diameter census data. This SMA 'slope-of-one' method produces results that contrast with those generated by maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE; Russo, Wiser & Coomes 2007; Coomes & Allen 2009). We hypothesize that the SMA slope-of-one method is inappropriate for this application because it assumes, unrealistically, that there is no biological or error variance in tree growth size scaling. To test our hypothesis, we simulate 'allometric' tree growth with biological and error variance in parameters and measurements. We find that the SMA slope-of-one method is sensitive to the amount of biological and error variance and consistently returns biassed parameter estimates, while the MLE method displays relatively little bias, particularly at larger sample sizes. Synthesis. The conclusions of Coomes & Allen (2009) should be reconsidered in the light of our findings. Investigations of tree growth rate size scaling must consider the influence of biological and error variance in model-fitting procedures to ultimately unravel the effects of tree architecture and ecological factors on patterns of size-dependent growth.

AB - Coomes & Allen (2009) propose a new statistical method to test the Metabolic Scaling Theory prediction for tree growth rate size scaling (scaling constant α=1/3) presented in Enquist (1999). This method finds values of the scaling constant that yield standardized major axis (SMA) slopes of one in a comparison of allometrically transformed diameter census data. This SMA 'slope-of-one' method produces results that contrast with those generated by maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE; Russo, Wiser & Coomes 2007; Coomes & Allen 2009). We hypothesize that the SMA slope-of-one method is inappropriate for this application because it assumes, unrealistically, that there is no biological or error variance in tree growth size scaling. To test our hypothesis, we simulate 'allometric' tree growth with biological and error variance in parameters and measurements. We find that the SMA slope-of-one method is sensitive to the amount of biological and error variance and consistently returns biassed parameter estimates, while the MLE method displays relatively little bias, particularly at larger sample sizes. Synthesis. The conclusions of Coomes & Allen (2009) should be reconsidered in the light of our findings. Investigations of tree growth rate size scaling must consider the influence of biological and error variance in model-fitting procedures to ultimately unravel the effects of tree architecture and ecological factors on patterns of size-dependent growth.

KW - Costa Rica

KW - Forests

KW - Growth rate size scaling

KW - Light competition

KW - Maximum-likelihood estimation

KW - Metabolic scaling theory

KW - Plant development and life-history traits

KW - San Emilio

KW - SMA line-fitting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954566751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954566751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01719.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01719.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79954566751

VL - 99

SP - 741

EP - 747

JO - Journal of Ecology

JF - Journal of Ecology

SN - 0022-0477

IS - 3

ER -