Return or integration? Politicizing displacement in Georgia

Peter Kabachnik, Beth Mitchneck, Joanna Regulska

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Displacement in Georgia is highly politicized. By invoking inflated numbers of IDPs, failing to integrate them, or trying to discourage spontaneous return, the Georgian government's actions at times point to their use of IDPs as a political weapon. We examine the discourses and policies surrounding IDPs, including laws designed to deal with them, institutions that manage them, and political statements about IDPs, as forms of governmentality and geopower. We critically assess Georgian IDP policies and discourses, documenting the shift from solely prioritizing return to, after 2007, allowing room, alongside the rhetoric of return, for a specific understanding of integration. Our analysis highlights how, for the Georgian government, the meaning of integration is constructed in a narrow fashion, primarily understood as the provision of housing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSecurity, Democracy and Development in the Southern Caucasus and the Black Sea Region
PublisherPeter Lang AG
Pages183-204
Number of pages22
Volume14
ISBN (Electronic)9783035108361
ISBN (Print)9783034313001
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2015

Keywords

  • <IDM-RE2>eopower
  • <IDM-RE2>eturn
  • <IDM-RE2>isplacement
  • <IDM-RE2>ntegration
  • <IDM-RE2>nternally displaced persons (IDPs)
  • <IDM-RE2>overnmentality
  • Abkhazia
  • Georgia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Return or integration? Politicizing displacement in Georgia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this