Return or integration? Politicizing displacement in Georgia

Peter Kabachnik, Beth A Mitchneck, Joanna Regulska

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Displacement in Georgia is highly politicized. By invoking inflated numbers of IDPs, failing to integrate them, or trying to discourage spontaneous return, the Georgian government's actions at times point to their use of IDPs as a political weapon. We examine the discourses and policies surrounding IDPs, including laws designed to deal with them, institutions that manage them, and political statements about IDPs, as forms of governmentality and geopower. We critically assess Georgian IDP policies and discourses, documenting the shift from solely prioritizing return to, after 2007, allowing room, alongside the rhetoric of return, for a specific understanding of integration. Our analysis highlights how, for the Georgian government, the meaning of integration is constructed in a narrow fashion, primarily understood as the provision of housing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSecurity, Democracy and Development in the Southern Caucasus and the Black Sea Region
PublisherPeter Lang AG
Pages183-204
Number of pages22
Volume14
ISBN (Print)9783035108361, 9783034313001
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2015

Fingerprint

discourse
governmentality
weapon
rhetoric
housing
Law

Keywords

  • <IDM-RE2>eopower
  • <IDM-RE2>eturn
  • <IDM-RE2>isplacement
  • <IDM-RE2>ntegration
  • <IDM-RE2>nternally displaced persons (IDPs)
  • <IDM-RE2>overnmentality
  • Abkhazia
  • Georgia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Kabachnik, P., Mitchneck, B. A., & Regulska, J. (2015). Return or integration? Politicizing displacement in Georgia. In Security, Democracy and Development in the Southern Caucasus and the Black Sea Region (Vol. 14, pp. 183-204). Peter Lang AG. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0836-1

Return or integration? Politicizing displacement in Georgia. / Kabachnik, Peter; Mitchneck, Beth A; Regulska, Joanna.

Security, Democracy and Development in the Southern Caucasus and the Black Sea Region. Vol. 14 Peter Lang AG, 2015. p. 183-204.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Kabachnik, P, Mitchneck, BA & Regulska, J 2015, Return or integration? Politicizing displacement in Georgia. in Security, Democracy and Development in the Southern Caucasus and the Black Sea Region. vol. 14, Peter Lang AG, pp. 183-204. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0836-1
Kabachnik P, Mitchneck BA, Regulska J. Return or integration? Politicizing displacement in Georgia. In Security, Democracy and Development in the Southern Caucasus and the Black Sea Region. Vol. 14. Peter Lang AG. 2015. p. 183-204 https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0836-1
Kabachnik, Peter ; Mitchneck, Beth A ; Regulska, Joanna. / Return or integration? Politicizing displacement in Georgia. Security, Democracy and Development in the Southern Caucasus and the Black Sea Region. Vol. 14 Peter Lang AG, 2015. pp. 183-204
@inbook{92f3bea00d704d39a6a760b6c2122090,
title = "Return or integration? Politicizing displacement in Georgia",
abstract = "Displacement in Georgia is highly politicized. By invoking inflated numbers of IDPs, failing to integrate them, or trying to discourage spontaneous return, the Georgian government's actions at times point to their use of IDPs as a political weapon. We examine the discourses and policies surrounding IDPs, including laws designed to deal with them, institutions that manage them, and political statements about IDPs, as forms of governmentality and geopower. We critically assess Georgian IDP policies and discourses, documenting the shift from solely prioritizing return to, after 2007, allowing room, alongside the rhetoric of return, for a specific understanding of integration. Our analysis highlights how, for the Georgian government, the meaning of integration is constructed in a narrow fashion, primarily understood as the provision of housing.",
keywords = "<IDM-RE2>eopower, <IDM-RE2>eturn, <IDM-RE2>isplacement, <IDM-RE2>ntegration, <IDM-RE2>nternally displaced persons (IDPs), <IDM-RE2>overnmentality, Abkhazia, Georgia",
author = "Peter Kabachnik and Mitchneck, {Beth A} and Joanna Regulska",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.3726/978-3-0351-0836-1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783035108361",
volume = "14",
pages = "183--204",
booktitle = "Security, Democracy and Development in the Southern Caucasus and the Black Sea Region",
publisher = "Peter Lang AG",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Return or integration? Politicizing displacement in Georgia

AU - Kabachnik, Peter

AU - Mitchneck, Beth A

AU - Regulska, Joanna

PY - 2015/5/4

Y1 - 2015/5/4

N2 - Displacement in Georgia is highly politicized. By invoking inflated numbers of IDPs, failing to integrate them, or trying to discourage spontaneous return, the Georgian government's actions at times point to their use of IDPs as a political weapon. We examine the discourses and policies surrounding IDPs, including laws designed to deal with them, institutions that manage them, and political statements about IDPs, as forms of governmentality and geopower. We critically assess Georgian IDP policies and discourses, documenting the shift from solely prioritizing return to, after 2007, allowing room, alongside the rhetoric of return, for a specific understanding of integration. Our analysis highlights how, for the Georgian government, the meaning of integration is constructed in a narrow fashion, primarily understood as the provision of housing.

AB - Displacement in Georgia is highly politicized. By invoking inflated numbers of IDPs, failing to integrate them, or trying to discourage spontaneous return, the Georgian government's actions at times point to their use of IDPs as a political weapon. We examine the discourses and policies surrounding IDPs, including laws designed to deal with them, institutions that manage them, and political statements about IDPs, as forms of governmentality and geopower. We critically assess Georgian IDP policies and discourses, documenting the shift from solely prioritizing return to, after 2007, allowing room, alongside the rhetoric of return, for a specific understanding of integration. Our analysis highlights how, for the Georgian government, the meaning of integration is constructed in a narrow fashion, primarily understood as the provision of housing.

KW - <IDM-RE2>eopower

KW - <IDM-RE2>eturn

KW - <IDM-RE2>isplacement

KW - <IDM-RE2>ntegration

KW - <IDM-RE2>nternally displaced persons (IDPs)

KW - <IDM-RE2>overnmentality

KW - Abkhazia

KW - Georgia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84967113428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84967113428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3726/978-3-0351-0836-1

DO - 10.3726/978-3-0351-0836-1

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84967113428

SN - 9783035108361

SN - 9783034313001

VL - 14

SP - 183

EP - 204

BT - Security, Democracy and Development in the Southern Caucasus and the Black Sea Region

PB - Peter Lang AG

ER -