Reversible inactivation of the medial septum differentially affects two forms of learning in rats

S. J Y Mizumori, G. M. Perez, M. C. Alvarado, Carol A Barnes, B. L. McNaughton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

152 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The contribution of the medial septum to different aspects of spatial information processing was assessed by examining the effects of reversible septal inactivation on radial maze performance of rats. In addition, the selectivity with which the medial septum affects learning was studied by testing the effects of septal inactivation on the acquisition of non-spatial information. Rats were first trained according to a spatial working memory procedure that included a 30-min delay between the first 4 (forced) choices and subsequent test (free) choices. The forced choices comprised the sample phase of the experiment while the free choices comprised the test phase. Saline or tetracaine (a local anesthetic) was injected into the medial septal area either before the sample phase, after the sample phase (i.e. at the beginning of the delay period), or just before the test phase. In contrast to the saline injections, tetracaine injected just before the samole or test phases produced a significant increase in errors at test. Tetracaine injection at the beginning of the delay period did not affect test choice accuracy. EEG records showed that septal inactivation drastically, yet temporarily, reduced the hippocampal Θ rhythm. Thus, when septal inactivation occurred either before the sample phase or at the beginning of the delay period, hippocampal Θ recovered by the time of the test phase. Septal inactivation also produced a significant retardation of learning on a non-spatial reference memory task, although clear improvement over trials did occur. Moreover, the results of subsequent saline injections suggest that at least some of the performance deficit was due to variables other than learning per se. Although such performance effects could at least in part account for the errors made when septal inactivation occurred before the test phase of the spatial task, it could not account for errors made when septal inactivation occurred before the sample phase. This result, together with the finding that septal inactivation drastically alters hippocampal single unit activity27, 28, is consistent with the hypothesis that normal septal activation (of perhaps the hippocampus) is required for acquisition of spatial information. Maintenance of spatial memory, on the other hand, may not rely on such activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-20
Number of pages9
JournalBrain Research
Volume528
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 24 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tetracaine
Learning
Injections
Septum of Brain
Local Anesthetics
Automatic Data Processing
Short-Term Memory
Electroencephalography
Hippocampus
Maintenance
Spatial Memory

Keywords

  • Electroencephalogram
  • Hippocampus
  • Medial septum
  • Non-spatial learning
  • Reversible inactivation
  • Spatial learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental Biology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Reversible inactivation of the medial septum differentially affects two forms of learning in rats. / Mizumori, S. J Y; Perez, G. M.; Alvarado, M. C.; Barnes, Carol A; McNaughton, B. L.

In: Brain Research, Vol. 528, No. 1, 24.09.1990, p. 12-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mizumori, S. J Y ; Perez, G. M. ; Alvarado, M. C. ; Barnes, Carol A ; McNaughton, B. L. / Reversible inactivation of the medial septum differentially affects two forms of learning in rats. In: Brain Research. 1990 ; Vol. 528, No. 1. pp. 12-20.
@article{a8da6b80192d4403a6e051076f73f077,
title = "Reversible inactivation of the medial septum differentially affects two forms of learning in rats",
abstract = "The contribution of the medial septum to different aspects of spatial information processing was assessed by examining the effects of reversible septal inactivation on radial maze performance of rats. In addition, the selectivity with which the medial septum affects learning was studied by testing the effects of septal inactivation on the acquisition of non-spatial information. Rats were first trained according to a spatial working memory procedure that included a 30-min delay between the first 4 (forced) choices and subsequent test (free) choices. The forced choices comprised the sample phase of the experiment while the free choices comprised the test phase. Saline or tetracaine (a local anesthetic) was injected into the medial septal area either before the sample phase, after the sample phase (i.e. at the beginning of the delay period), or just before the test phase. In contrast to the saline injections, tetracaine injected just before the samole or test phases produced a significant increase in errors at test. Tetracaine injection at the beginning of the delay period did not affect test choice accuracy. EEG records showed that septal inactivation drastically, yet temporarily, reduced the hippocampal Θ rhythm. Thus, when septal inactivation occurred either before the sample phase or at the beginning of the delay period, hippocampal Θ recovered by the time of the test phase. Septal inactivation also produced a significant retardation of learning on a non-spatial reference memory task, although clear improvement over trials did occur. Moreover, the results of subsequent saline injections suggest that at least some of the performance deficit was due to variables other than learning per se. Although such performance effects could at least in part account for the errors made when septal inactivation occurred before the test phase of the spatial task, it could not account for errors made when septal inactivation occurred before the sample phase. This result, together with the finding that septal inactivation drastically alters hippocampal single unit activity27, 28, is consistent with the hypothesis that normal septal activation (of perhaps the hippocampus) is required for acquisition of spatial information. Maintenance of spatial memory, on the other hand, may not rely on such activity.",
keywords = "Electroencephalogram, Hippocampus, Medial septum, Non-spatial learning, Reversible inactivation, Spatial learning",
author = "Mizumori, {S. J Y} and Perez, {G. M.} and Alvarado, {M. C.} and Barnes, {Carol A} and McNaughton, {B. L.}",
year = "1990",
month = "9",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/0006-8993(90)90188-H",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "528",
pages = "12--20",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reversible inactivation of the medial septum differentially affects two forms of learning in rats

AU - Mizumori, S. J Y

AU - Perez, G. M.

AU - Alvarado, M. C.

AU - Barnes, Carol A

AU - McNaughton, B. L.

PY - 1990/9/24

Y1 - 1990/9/24

N2 - The contribution of the medial septum to different aspects of spatial information processing was assessed by examining the effects of reversible septal inactivation on radial maze performance of rats. In addition, the selectivity with which the medial septum affects learning was studied by testing the effects of septal inactivation on the acquisition of non-spatial information. Rats were first trained according to a spatial working memory procedure that included a 30-min delay between the first 4 (forced) choices and subsequent test (free) choices. The forced choices comprised the sample phase of the experiment while the free choices comprised the test phase. Saline or tetracaine (a local anesthetic) was injected into the medial septal area either before the sample phase, after the sample phase (i.e. at the beginning of the delay period), or just before the test phase. In contrast to the saline injections, tetracaine injected just before the samole or test phases produced a significant increase in errors at test. Tetracaine injection at the beginning of the delay period did not affect test choice accuracy. EEG records showed that septal inactivation drastically, yet temporarily, reduced the hippocampal Θ rhythm. Thus, when septal inactivation occurred either before the sample phase or at the beginning of the delay period, hippocampal Θ recovered by the time of the test phase. Septal inactivation also produced a significant retardation of learning on a non-spatial reference memory task, although clear improvement over trials did occur. Moreover, the results of subsequent saline injections suggest that at least some of the performance deficit was due to variables other than learning per se. Although such performance effects could at least in part account for the errors made when septal inactivation occurred before the test phase of the spatial task, it could not account for errors made when septal inactivation occurred before the sample phase. This result, together with the finding that septal inactivation drastically alters hippocampal single unit activity27, 28, is consistent with the hypothesis that normal septal activation (of perhaps the hippocampus) is required for acquisition of spatial information. Maintenance of spatial memory, on the other hand, may not rely on such activity.

AB - The contribution of the medial septum to different aspects of spatial information processing was assessed by examining the effects of reversible septal inactivation on radial maze performance of rats. In addition, the selectivity with which the medial septum affects learning was studied by testing the effects of septal inactivation on the acquisition of non-spatial information. Rats were first trained according to a spatial working memory procedure that included a 30-min delay between the first 4 (forced) choices and subsequent test (free) choices. The forced choices comprised the sample phase of the experiment while the free choices comprised the test phase. Saline or tetracaine (a local anesthetic) was injected into the medial septal area either before the sample phase, after the sample phase (i.e. at the beginning of the delay period), or just before the test phase. In contrast to the saline injections, tetracaine injected just before the samole or test phases produced a significant increase in errors at test. Tetracaine injection at the beginning of the delay period did not affect test choice accuracy. EEG records showed that septal inactivation drastically, yet temporarily, reduced the hippocampal Θ rhythm. Thus, when septal inactivation occurred either before the sample phase or at the beginning of the delay period, hippocampal Θ recovered by the time of the test phase. Septal inactivation also produced a significant retardation of learning on a non-spatial reference memory task, although clear improvement over trials did occur. Moreover, the results of subsequent saline injections suggest that at least some of the performance deficit was due to variables other than learning per se. Although such performance effects could at least in part account for the errors made when septal inactivation occurred before the test phase of the spatial task, it could not account for errors made when septal inactivation occurred before the sample phase. This result, together with the finding that septal inactivation drastically alters hippocampal single unit activity27, 28, is consistent with the hypothesis that normal septal activation (of perhaps the hippocampus) is required for acquisition of spatial information. Maintenance of spatial memory, on the other hand, may not rely on such activity.

KW - Electroencephalogram

KW - Hippocampus

KW - Medial septum

KW - Non-spatial learning

KW - Reversible inactivation

KW - Spatial learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025166923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025166923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90188-H

DO - 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90188-H

M3 - Article

C2 - 2245328

AN - SCOPUS:0025166923

VL - 528

SP - 12

EP - 20

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

IS - 1

ER -