Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization

Mary P Koss, Antonia Abbey, Rebecca Campbell, Sarah Cook, Jeanette Norris, Maria Testa, Sarah Ullman, Carolyn West, Jacquelyn White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

437 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) assesses victimization and perpetration of unwanted sexual experiences (e.g., Koss, Gidycz, & Wisniewski, 1987). Revised versions of the SES that resulted from the work of the SES Collaboration are now available. This article reviews weaknesses of the SES that were identified, strengths that were preserved, and methodological considerations in the measurement of unwanted sexual experiences that informed the revisions. The primary changes include: more behavioral specificity; conversion to gender neutrality; full crossing of unwanted acts and coercive tactics; and revised and updated wording for assessing consent, alcohol-related incidents, unwanted acts, and coercive tactics. For illustration, the full text of the revised victimization version and its scoring rules are provided. The article concludes with suggestions for future research. These suggestions aim to involve researchers in a coordinated agenda to develop data that clarify methodological questions and contribute to continued improvement in assessing sexual victimization and perpetration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-370
Number of pages14
JournalPsychology of Women Quarterly
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Crime Victims
Aggression
victimization
aggression
experience
tactics
Alcohols
Research Personnel
neutrality
Surveys and Questionnaires
Victimization
Sexual
incident
alcohol
gender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Gender Studies

Cite this

Revising the SES : A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. / Koss, Mary P; Abbey, Antonia; Campbell, Rebecca; Cook, Sarah; Norris, Jeanette; Testa, Maria; Ullman, Sarah; West, Carolyn; White, Jacquelyn.

In: Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 4, 12.2007, p. 357-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koss, MP, Abbey, A, Campbell, R, Cook, S, Norris, J, Testa, M, Ullman, S, West, C & White, J 2007, 'Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization', Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x
Koss, Mary P ; Abbey, Antonia ; Campbell, Rebecca ; Cook, Sarah ; Norris, Jeanette ; Testa, Maria ; Ullman, Sarah ; West, Carolyn ; White, Jacquelyn. / Revising the SES : A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. In: Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2007 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 357-370.
@article{eba97c036b2b426b9e445a610c7fed4c,
title = "Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization",
abstract = "The Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) assesses victimization and perpetration of unwanted sexual experiences (e.g., Koss, Gidycz, & Wisniewski, 1987). Revised versions of the SES that resulted from the work of the SES Collaboration are now available. This article reviews weaknesses of the SES that were identified, strengths that were preserved, and methodological considerations in the measurement of unwanted sexual experiences that informed the revisions. The primary changes include: more behavioral specificity; conversion to gender neutrality; full crossing of unwanted acts and coercive tactics; and revised and updated wording for assessing consent, alcohol-related incidents, unwanted acts, and coercive tactics. For illustration, the full text of the revised victimization version and its scoring rules are provided. The article concludes with suggestions for future research. These suggestions aim to involve researchers in a coordinated agenda to develop data that clarify methodological questions and contribute to continued improvement in assessing sexual victimization and perpetration.",
author = "Koss, {Mary P} and Antonia Abbey and Rebecca Campbell and Sarah Cook and Jeanette Norris and Maria Testa and Sarah Ullman and Carolyn West and Jacquelyn White",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "357--370",
journal = "Psychology of Women Quarterly",
issn = "0361-6843",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revising the SES

T2 - A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization

AU - Koss, Mary P

AU - Abbey, Antonia

AU - Campbell, Rebecca

AU - Cook, Sarah

AU - Norris, Jeanette

AU - Testa, Maria

AU - Ullman, Sarah

AU - West, Carolyn

AU - White, Jacquelyn

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - The Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) assesses victimization and perpetration of unwanted sexual experiences (e.g., Koss, Gidycz, & Wisniewski, 1987). Revised versions of the SES that resulted from the work of the SES Collaboration are now available. This article reviews weaknesses of the SES that were identified, strengths that were preserved, and methodological considerations in the measurement of unwanted sexual experiences that informed the revisions. The primary changes include: more behavioral specificity; conversion to gender neutrality; full crossing of unwanted acts and coercive tactics; and revised and updated wording for assessing consent, alcohol-related incidents, unwanted acts, and coercive tactics. For illustration, the full text of the revised victimization version and its scoring rules are provided. The article concludes with suggestions for future research. These suggestions aim to involve researchers in a coordinated agenda to develop data that clarify methodological questions and contribute to continued improvement in assessing sexual victimization and perpetration.

AB - The Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) assesses victimization and perpetration of unwanted sexual experiences (e.g., Koss, Gidycz, & Wisniewski, 1987). Revised versions of the SES that resulted from the work of the SES Collaboration are now available. This article reviews weaknesses of the SES that were identified, strengths that were preserved, and methodological considerations in the measurement of unwanted sexual experiences that informed the revisions. The primary changes include: more behavioral specificity; conversion to gender neutrality; full crossing of unwanted acts and coercive tactics; and revised and updated wording for assessing consent, alcohol-related incidents, unwanted acts, and coercive tactics. For illustration, the full text of the revised victimization version and its scoring rules are provided. The article concludes with suggestions for future research. These suggestions aim to involve researchers in a coordinated agenda to develop data that clarify methodological questions and contribute to continued improvement in assessing sexual victimization and perpetration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36448930953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36448930953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36448930953

VL - 31

SP - 357

EP - 370

JO - Psychology of Women Quarterly

JF - Psychology of Women Quarterly

SN - 0361-6843

IS - 4

ER -