Revisiting the Relationship Between Data, Models, and Decision-Making

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We hydrologists can do a better job of supporting water-resources decision-making. I will argue that we can do this by recognizing that decision makers use qualitative, multiple-narrative approaches. So, rather than providing single-model predictions with quantitative uncertainties, we should develop teams of rival models that inform decision makers about what is known, what is possible, and what is unknown. This requires that we build ensembles of models that include biased, advocacy models that directly represent stakeholders' interests or concerns. From this inclusive platform, we can speak objectively and clearly about the risks that drive stakeholders' decisions. Furthermore, we will be promoting more appropriate use of the scientific method in making informed water-resources decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)604-614
Number of pages11
JournalGroundWater
Volume55
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Data structures
Decision making
decision making
Water resources
stakeholder
water resource
advocacy
decision
prediction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Computers in Earth Sciences

Cite this

Revisiting the Relationship Between Data, Models, and Decision-Making. / Ferre, Paul A.

In: GroundWater, Vol. 55, No. 5, 01.09.2017, p. 604-614.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8eae16f94244761885ecf581853472e,
title = "Revisiting the Relationship Between Data, Models, and Decision-Making",
abstract = "We hydrologists can do a better job of supporting water-resources decision-making. I will argue that we can do this by recognizing that decision makers use qualitative, multiple-narrative approaches. So, rather than providing single-model predictions with quantitative uncertainties, we should develop teams of rival models that inform decision makers about what is known, what is possible, and what is unknown. This requires that we build ensembles of models that include biased, advocacy models that directly represent stakeholders' interests or concerns. From this inclusive platform, we can speak objectively and clearly about the risks that drive stakeholders' decisions. Furthermore, we will be promoting more appropriate use of the scientific method in making informed water-resources decisions.",
author = "Ferre, {Paul A}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/gwat.12574",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "604--614",
journal = "Ground Water",
issn = "0017-467X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the Relationship Between Data, Models, and Decision-Making

AU - Ferre, Paul A

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - We hydrologists can do a better job of supporting water-resources decision-making. I will argue that we can do this by recognizing that decision makers use qualitative, multiple-narrative approaches. So, rather than providing single-model predictions with quantitative uncertainties, we should develop teams of rival models that inform decision makers about what is known, what is possible, and what is unknown. This requires that we build ensembles of models that include biased, advocacy models that directly represent stakeholders' interests or concerns. From this inclusive platform, we can speak objectively and clearly about the risks that drive stakeholders' decisions. Furthermore, we will be promoting more appropriate use of the scientific method in making informed water-resources decisions.

AB - We hydrologists can do a better job of supporting water-resources decision-making. I will argue that we can do this by recognizing that decision makers use qualitative, multiple-narrative approaches. So, rather than providing single-model predictions with quantitative uncertainties, we should develop teams of rival models that inform decision makers about what is known, what is possible, and what is unknown. This requires that we build ensembles of models that include biased, advocacy models that directly represent stakeholders' interests or concerns. From this inclusive platform, we can speak objectively and clearly about the risks that drive stakeholders' decisions. Furthermore, we will be promoting more appropriate use of the scientific method in making informed water-resources decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029634137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029634137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gwat.12574

DO - 10.1111/gwat.12574

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 604

EP - 614

JO - Ground Water

JF - Ground Water

SN - 0017-467X

IS - 5

ER -