Rice age

Comments on the panel report in Turkey measures affecting the importation of rice

David A Gantz, Simon A B Schropp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At face value, TurkeyRice is not the most complex or important WTO dispute ever litigated. The facts of the case give strong reason to believe that Turkey's restrictions on rice imports from the United States were not GATT-consistent. Turkey's steadfast refusal to provide exonerating evidence in its defence and the Panel's drawing of appropriate inference were probably the most remarkable issues of the case. Nevertheless, TurkeyRice raises at least one interesting legal and economic question: How activist are dispute panels today, and how interventionist should they be during the litigation process? We discuss the justification and role of activist panels and assess the consequences for parties' strategic behavior and incentive to provide accurate information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-177
Number of pages33
JournalWorld Trade Review
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Turkey
GATT
WTO
import
incentive
evidence
economics
Dispute
Litigation
Justification
Economics
Strategic behavior
Inference
Incentives
Import

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Rice age : Comments on the panel report in Turkey measures affecting the importation of rice. / Gantz, David A; Schropp, Simon A B.

In: World Trade Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 145-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f450e60dd1224379aed2de21fba951b1,
title = "Rice age: Comments on the panel report in Turkey measures affecting the importation of rice",
abstract = "At face value, TurkeyRice is not the most complex or important WTO dispute ever litigated. The facts of the case give strong reason to believe that Turkey's restrictions on rice imports from the United States were not GATT-consistent. Turkey's steadfast refusal to provide exonerating evidence in its defence and the Panel's drawing of appropriate inference were probably the most remarkable issues of the case. Nevertheless, TurkeyRice raises at least one interesting legal and economic question: How activist are dispute panels today, and how interventionist should they be during the litigation process? We discuss the justification and role of activist panels and assess the consequences for parties' strategic behavior and incentive to provide accurate information.",
author = "Gantz, {David A} and Schropp, {Simon A B}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1474745608004205",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "145--177",
journal = "World Trade Review",
issn = "1474-7456",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rice age

T2 - Comments on the panel report in Turkey measures affecting the importation of rice

AU - Gantz, David A

AU - Schropp, Simon A B

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - At face value, TurkeyRice is not the most complex or important WTO dispute ever litigated. The facts of the case give strong reason to believe that Turkey's restrictions on rice imports from the United States were not GATT-consistent. Turkey's steadfast refusal to provide exonerating evidence in its defence and the Panel's drawing of appropriate inference were probably the most remarkable issues of the case. Nevertheless, TurkeyRice raises at least one interesting legal and economic question: How activist are dispute panels today, and how interventionist should they be during the litigation process? We discuss the justification and role of activist panels and assess the consequences for parties' strategic behavior and incentive to provide accurate information.

AB - At face value, TurkeyRice is not the most complex or important WTO dispute ever litigated. The facts of the case give strong reason to believe that Turkey's restrictions on rice imports from the United States were not GATT-consistent. Turkey's steadfast refusal to provide exonerating evidence in its defence and the Panel's drawing of appropriate inference were probably the most remarkable issues of the case. Nevertheless, TurkeyRice raises at least one interesting legal and economic question: How activist are dispute panels today, and how interventionist should they be during the litigation process? We discuss the justification and role of activist panels and assess the consequences for parties' strategic behavior and incentive to provide accurate information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70649088942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70649088942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1474745608004205

DO - 10.1017/S1474745608004205

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 145

EP - 177

JO - World Trade Review

JF - World Trade Review

SN - 1474-7456

IS - 1

ER -