Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation

Mihai Surdeanu, Ramesh Nallapati, George Gregory, Joshua Walker, Christopher D. Manning

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We introduce the problem of risk analysis for Intellectual Property (IP) lawsuits. More specifically, we focus on estimating the risk for participating parties using solely prior factors, i. e., historical and concurrent behavior of the entities involved in the case. This work represents a first step towards building a comprehensive legal risk assessment system for parties involved in litigation. This technology will allow parties to optimize their case parameters to minimize their own risk, or to settle disputes out of court and thereby ease the burden on the judicial system. In addition, it will also help U.S. courts detect and fix any inherent biases in the system. We model risk estimation as a relational classification problem using conditional random fields [6] to jointly estimate the risks of concurrent cases. We evaluate our model on data collected by the Stanford Intellectual Property Litigation Clearinghouse, which consists of over 4,200 IP lawsuits filed across 88 U.S. federal districts and ranging over 8 years, probably the largest legal data set reported in data mining research. Despite being agnostic to the merits of the case, our best model achieves a classification accuracy of 64%, 22% (relative) higher than the majority-class baseline.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Pages116-120
Number of pages5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2011 - Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Duration: Jun 6 2011Jun 10 2011

Other

Other13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2011
CountryUnited States
CityPittsburgh, PA
Period6/6/116/10/11

Fingerprint

Intellectual property
Risk analysis
intellectual property
lawsuit
Risk assessment
Data mining
risk assessment
district
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Law

Cite this

Surdeanu, M., Nallapati, R., Gregory, G., Walker, J., & Manning, C. D. (2011). Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 116-120) https://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018375

Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation. / Surdeanu, Mihai; Nallapati, Ramesh; Gregory, George; Walker, Joshua; Manning, Christopher D.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2011. p. 116-120.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Surdeanu, M, Nallapati, R, Gregory, G, Walker, J & Manning, CD 2011, Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. pp. 116-120, 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2011, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 6/6/11. https://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018375
Surdeanu M, Nallapati R, Gregory G, Walker J, Manning CD. Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2011. p. 116-120 https://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018375
Surdeanu, Mihai ; Nallapati, Ramesh ; Gregory, George ; Walker, Joshua ; Manning, Christopher D. / Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2011. pp. 116-120
@inproceedings{0f3cee9a3dee4716994da704de1766d5,
title = "Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation",
abstract = "We introduce the problem of risk analysis for Intellectual Property (IP) lawsuits. More specifically, we focus on estimating the risk for participating parties using solely prior factors, i. e., historical and concurrent behavior of the entities involved in the case. This work represents a first step towards building a comprehensive legal risk assessment system for parties involved in litigation. This technology will allow parties to optimize their case parameters to minimize their own risk, or to settle disputes out of court and thereby ease the burden on the judicial system. In addition, it will also help U.S. courts detect and fix any inherent biases in the system. We model risk estimation as a relational classification problem using conditional random fields [6] to jointly estimate the risks of concurrent cases. We evaluate our model on data collected by the Stanford Intellectual Property Litigation Clearinghouse, which consists of over 4,200 IP lawsuits filed across 88 U.S. federal districts and ranging over 8 years, probably the largest legal data set reported in data mining research. Despite being agnostic to the merits of the case, our best model achieves a classification accuracy of 64{\%}, 22{\%} (relative) higher than the majority-class baseline.",
author = "Mihai Surdeanu and Ramesh Nallapati and George Gregory and Joshua Walker and Manning, {Christopher D.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1145/2018358.2018375",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781450307550",
pages = "116--120",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation

AU - Surdeanu, Mihai

AU - Nallapati, Ramesh

AU - Gregory, George

AU - Walker, Joshua

AU - Manning, Christopher D.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - We introduce the problem of risk analysis for Intellectual Property (IP) lawsuits. More specifically, we focus on estimating the risk for participating parties using solely prior factors, i. e., historical and concurrent behavior of the entities involved in the case. This work represents a first step towards building a comprehensive legal risk assessment system for parties involved in litigation. This technology will allow parties to optimize their case parameters to minimize their own risk, or to settle disputes out of court and thereby ease the burden on the judicial system. In addition, it will also help U.S. courts detect and fix any inherent biases in the system. We model risk estimation as a relational classification problem using conditional random fields [6] to jointly estimate the risks of concurrent cases. We evaluate our model on data collected by the Stanford Intellectual Property Litigation Clearinghouse, which consists of over 4,200 IP lawsuits filed across 88 U.S. federal districts and ranging over 8 years, probably the largest legal data set reported in data mining research. Despite being agnostic to the merits of the case, our best model achieves a classification accuracy of 64%, 22% (relative) higher than the majority-class baseline.

AB - We introduce the problem of risk analysis for Intellectual Property (IP) lawsuits. More specifically, we focus on estimating the risk for participating parties using solely prior factors, i. e., historical and concurrent behavior of the entities involved in the case. This work represents a first step towards building a comprehensive legal risk assessment system for parties involved in litigation. This technology will allow parties to optimize their case parameters to minimize their own risk, or to settle disputes out of court and thereby ease the burden on the judicial system. In addition, it will also help U.S. courts detect and fix any inherent biases in the system. We model risk estimation as a relational classification problem using conditional random fields [6] to jointly estimate the risks of concurrent cases. We evaluate our model on data collected by the Stanford Intellectual Property Litigation Clearinghouse, which consists of over 4,200 IP lawsuits filed across 88 U.S. federal districts and ranging over 8 years, probably the largest legal data set reported in data mining research. Despite being agnostic to the merits of the case, our best model achieves a classification accuracy of 64%, 22% (relative) higher than the majority-class baseline.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052414518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052414518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2018358.2018375

DO - 10.1145/2018358.2018375

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781450307550

SP - 116

EP - 120

BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

ER -